This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
That's not what that scan says, but even if it was, that would not be evidence for QS.
That link doesn't work, but from how you describe it, it's not evidence for QS.
That implies a countably infinite or smaller increase in size, which is not evidence for QS, and implies that it doesn't occupy...
That just looks like an outdated version of this blog, which has been discussed since the start.
Useless, uninformed posts like this make me consider converting this thread to staff-only.
No.
If six explanations aren't enough for y'all I can't do anything more. At least the other staff members who have read those posts seem to understand and agree.
I expected there to be something like that, and it supports my point, so, cool?
I can, actually. It's from this scan; the one I...
No; "Although impervious even to volcanic fire, the Frosts are weak to higher realms of incendiary" just seems to be a poetic way of saying "They're invulnerable to volcanic fire, but weak to even stronger fire." Treating "higher realm" as referring to a literal realm doesn't make sense...
And despite you claiming the entire series contradicts that notion, you haven't provided one piece of evidence of that.
Yeah, obviously.
It's very relevant. For reasons I've explained, what, six times?
This scan says "...there was a line of light, and the world ended up separated into two"...
A ray of light is not infinitesimal, it's finite.
And, as said, going off of other parts of the text, it implies that the human world is comparable in size to the demon world; two worlds co-existing is incongruent with one world being an infinitesimal line splitting another world in two (that'd...
Basically, yeah. The evidence, with its elaboration, shows it's an anti-feat (by having the human world be non-zero in comparison), rather than something that actually qualifies.
If there was enough sufficiently explicit evidence for it being Low 1-C, that'd turn the tides, but most of it's...
If those six prior explanations aren't sufficient (and they seem to be, since you're still not grappling with my point), then there's nothing I can do.
This seems to contradict other information repeated by supporters throughout this thread (i.e. that the Demon World still contains the Human...
Well you know what they say, sixth time's the charm.
I AM NOT saying that you NEED A STATEMENT of the 5th axis being uncountably infinitely larger as AFFIRMATIVE PROOF.
I AM saying that IF THERE IS A STATEMENT of the 5th axis being countably infinltely larger, or smaller, that is DISQUALIFYING...
That's not what I said. I repeated that later; you don't need evidence of uncountably infinite size in a 5-D space to be Low 1-C, but being only countably infinitely larger than a 4-D construct proves that such a construct doesn't have any size in 5-D space, and as such, is evidence against it...
@HammerStrikes219 That doesn't answer my question.
If you make another unhelpful post I'll thread-ban you. CGMs are only meant to post here when they've got helpful information; you've been posting things that misunderstand the topic of this thread the whole time.