- 18,393
- 14,323
- Thread starter
- #161
This is really not the only single aspect of process. So the patience is really required.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Okay, I'll stop bumping this thread.This is really not the only single aspect of process. So the patience is really required.
Is this a prelude to a staff survey for them taking place?I have now sent out staff recruitment private messages for translation helper positions.
Similar text is present on the page for Image Helpers.Benefits
The benefits of being a TH team:
- Staff member: Translators are part of the managing staff, and as such can take part in staff discussions. In other words, they are allowed to offer input regarding the future direction of the site, and their opinions will be taken into consideration when creating/modifying site policies.
Hmm. I am not sure if we should include that particular text for image helpers and translation helpers unless they have been invited to staff only threads. I will ask the other highest ranked staff members about it.Hm, this made it sound like it would be a position of power.
Similar text is present on the page for Image Helpers.
I have 21 reasons for not allowing content moderator to have evaluation rights but that's also for other discussion.I disagree with content mods not being evaluating staff, being very blunt about it, but that's another discussion. Evaluating staff rights are not coterminous with staff discussion rights, and I think any more senior member of the staff ought to be included. I don't mean to disregard opinions, but if we're cordoning off discussion already, I feel that roles serving singular, almost always unrelated duties shouldn't be included any more than any knowledgeable blue name.
They are staff members of wiki, simply not even giving the benefits that each role has, then we are questioning now the purpose of image helpers and translation helpers.Well, our highest staff members will have to discuss it in private. We cannot be certain that all of the translation helpers will handle it responsibly.
Don't worry about it. You guys do good work and I hate speaking against you because I fear you may take it personally. I don't want to stress you out.Is it okay if I can express my honesty here? Yes, it's true that Image Helpers (which would include me), this suggested staff addition, Calc Group, and Content Moderators aren't evaluating staff. But even then, they should still all be knowledgeable in our site/wiki standards, considered that we're expected to be depended on for our duties. But I'm gonna stop right there, because I don't need to stress myself too much
I have 21 reasons for not allowing content moderator to have evaluation rights but that's also for other discussion.
The one in my OP.Speaking of which, what is the current draft text for the translation helper staff instruction page?
Is the image helpers page also edited?Probably nothing, but it is good if others verify as well.
Yes.Is the image helpers page also edited?
So can this be closed, and when will the people who've agreed receive the position?Probably nothing, but it is good if others verify as well.
Is the role here also created and tested?AKM sama will create a promotion thread relatively soon.
Yap. I appreciate helping in this matter.It has been removed.
Should we close this thread now?