Hello Bambu, I'd like your opinion regarding a certain modification for the
Creation Feats page, more specifically, this part:
As such creating
a dimension large enough to contain a starry sky does qualify as a
4-A Tier feat; however.
- There should be evidence or a well detailed explanation that a pocket dimension was created, and not simply an illusion or teleportation to another location.
- There should be some reason to consider the backgrounds stars, not just painted decorations within a throne room or museum.
- Even though there is concrete evidence for pocket reality creations to qualify as an Attack Potency feat; it should not be assumed to scale to physical statistics without some notable scaling reasons. Examples include on screen demonstrations, examples of destruction, or information that the same pool of energy used to create said dimension can translate to the same amount of energy being used for other abilities including but not limited to physical strikes.
Specifically, I want you to focus on the second criterion. I feel like there are a lot of visual presentations that are, especially in games or similar visual media, simply decoration flares and aren't meant to prove the size or the tier of a Pocket Reality.
My main issue, specifically, is the fact that in some games (or similar media) where such a feat happens, we simply "accept the stars as they are because there is no reason not to" when they have no mention of them, nor by characters, nor by the narrative. If anything, they might as well not exist. The worst part, in my opinion, is that the opposite is equally plausible, but simply dismissed due to "lack of proof" when the positive affirmation is equally lacking proof.
The point I'd like to make is simply that the "background stars, planets, moons, or anything really" that exist within a pocket reality should, at the very least, be acknowledged somewhere. By a character, the narrative, heck, even the context could be inferred if needed.
vsbattles.com
