• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Quick question about demon world size

Makai641001

He/Him
VS Battles
Retired
Messages
5,914
Reaction score
4,597
Hi everyone, I have a quick but important question about Behemoth in Four Knights of the Apocalypse.

As some of y’all may know this Beast is MASSIVE (Around 66000 km long which is like 5x earth’s diametre) but he is way smaller than the demon world.

Blud was also gonna destroy the planet by waking up, screaming etc…

What can we suggest about DW planet, it’s size.
 
It’s a lowball and it was accepted by multiple CGM iirc
That doesn't necessarily preclude it from being wrong.

Calcs can be mathematically correct while still being built on flawed assumptions or pixelscaling, or inconsistent art in general.

Not saying that is the case here though.
 
I have a question about this calc. Why is each pixel 15km in height? This does not appear to be explained very well in the calc. Can we not calc the spines from the image itself? Which appears to be the lines we can see in the full image of the creature? That would be much more accurate and not lead to what looks like a frankly ridiculous size.
 
That doesn't necessarily preclude it from being wrong.

Calcs can be mathematically correct while still being built on flawed assumptions or pixelscaling, or inconsistent art in general.

Not saying that is the case here though.
Ignore the 2nd photo in the link, that's a mistake, I checked it by looking at the anime and no
and the thing that looks like a mountain in the background in the 3rd photo is not in the anime, that scene is there but that thing is not there
Scans
There are these 2 images that we can see around and obviously one of this size should show the curvature of the earth and be visible from space but it still fits in the atmosphere and does not show the curvature


and there is nothing wrong with it, in fact it was made with a stronger weld than the size calculation it was first made with
 
I have a question about this calc. Why is each pixel 15km in height? This does not appear to be explained very well in the calc. Can we not calc the spines from the image itself? Which appears to be the lines we can see in the full image of the creature? That would be much more accurate and not lead to what looks like a frankly ridiculous size.
Do not be fooled by the 2nd and 3rd images in the link, they cannot be used, there is already an accepted crt about this size calculation
There is no inconsistency, you should look carefully and this is a recalculation, after the first one was accepted, some deficiencies were completed and increased to this value
Everything is explained there, but to summarize, a 300-meter giant is tens of times smaller than a hair's breadth, and even a flea analogy has been made
Yes, everyone is surprised by this enormous size.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top