- 3,196
- 1,572
- Thread starter
- #41
I wasn't aware that Random specifically invited you in, personally as you were in that original thread and would take a lot of convincing I believe it would be preferable for all if this thread had been given time to progress and for more perspectives and changes to come in. I'll defend the draft when I feel it's correct, but fact of the matter is it's a draft, not a final version, and thus needs review and improvement; shouldn't be going straight to showing it off to someone who has reason to doubt it's viability and necessity.Yeah but I don't think that really changes the issue of "you're making it harder to figure out where any specific feat goes", how am I gonna figure out if someone managed to exceed their physiological limit or not in any specific feat (unless it's super obvious)? Just because you add more details it doesn't make it easier to pick, in fact the fact that you're splitting the power into multiple categories makes it harder.
Also I noticed this specific bit, two things:
1) Random asked me to comment, i literally wouldn't have even seen this otherwise and I would have just gone on with my life without giving a shit
2) If you're gonna keep taking my disagreement in bad faith and imply I'm biased I'm gonna stop making the effort to try and see your perspective, dig in my heels and force you to try and get other staff, since I don't really have much love for that kind of accusation and I don't exactly get paid to sit here and listen to it
I'm sorry and will retract my accusation, as you being upset by it is sufficient to make it clear it was made in error. I hope we can drop this particular sticking point in the conversation and move on from it. If you find it best to leave the conversation, though, I understand.
Last edited: