StretchSebe
They/Them- 1,006
- 740
The current iteration of the invulnerability page is... lacking, to say the least.
No offense to whoever made it. But there's a lot more to invulnerability than 'durability' and being wary of 'No Limits Fallacy.' In fact, there's many ways Invulnerability is limited.
So, I worked on a rough draft in a blog for a potential update/revamp to the page, with:
Agree: Vzearr, Duedate8898 (?), Wikisource, Blunt_Claw, BrackishBrineBroth
Disagree: Hypertornado099
No offense to whoever made it. But there's a lot more to invulnerability than 'durability' and being wary of 'No Limits Fallacy.' In fact, there's many ways Invulnerability is limited.
So, I worked on a rough draft in a blog for a potential update/revamp to the page, with:
- A more detailed, and upfront explanation of invulnerability and it's major limitations.
- Common types across fictions, notes on specific points (such as how to equalize certain kinds of nigh-invulnerability from one verse to another), and character examples for each.
- A Limitations section going into both non-physical ways an invulnerable character can be dealt with, and even physical ways.
Agree: Vzearr, Duedate8898 (?), Wikisource, Blunt_Claw, BrackishBrineBroth
Disagree: Hypertornado099
Last edited: