Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't consider it too severe. It's nothing more than a slap-on-the-wrist scenario.@The_Yellow_Topaz straight up just called a guy illiterate
Saitama and Garou speed upscale to mftl+
In this calc of garou and platinum sperm, there is an error which needs to be fixed. The calculations uses 1.3 milli second...vsbattles.com
Belongs in vandalism reports.REX9097 keeps changing profiles without CTRs,
He gives them Type 4 Acausality.
Ok, doneBelongs in vandalism reports.
This was meant to be more of a slap on the wrist, he did mock me a little when I explained the first time. Yes, I know it's an exaggeration to say using the skull emoji was mocking, but I'm not reporting him over it.@The_Yellow_Topaz straight up just called a guy illiterate
Saitama and Garou speed upscale to mftl+
In this calc of garou and platinum sperm, there is an error which needs to be fixed. The calculations uses 1.3 milli second...vsbattles.com
Your lack of understanding of how physics work is astounding.
Yes because that's how the site works.
If you argue "well physics don't matter!" I can equally argue that the feat isn't that high anyway because "Well they distort physics! We can't use physics to deduce their AP is that high!"
The Inverse Square Law applies to every single verse without question, unless there is an actual, verbatim statement against it.
Stop trying to wank the verse, it's annoying, and your logic is equally annoying in this.
Yes, call me a wanker when I was not disrespecting you, hypocritical, I think you are very annoying too
I did not call you a wanker, I called what you are doing wanking. And I did not call you annoying, but what you are doing currently. Please learn to not take everything as a personal attack.
What you are doing is in fact wanking the series, that is an objective statement.
You are actively advocating for an inconsistent ranking which does not align with wiki rules. That is wanking a series.
I will be very honest with you, at this point, because of your passive aggressive behavior in this thread lately, I don't have any wish to work together with you in this verse, I will be indirectly called a wanker by you if I give any of my opinions about the scaling of this verse, anyway, you can disagree with me of course, no problem, it is the fun of discussions, just don't call me annoying or indirectly insult me
Again, you are taking this personally and misinterpreting what I've said;
I've called your Argenti scaling wanking, becuase by definition it is.
If you wish to be offended and not talk, that's up to you.
See? You are again at that mentality talking "No, you are wrong! Just I am right!", what are you doing is the definition of arrogance
You are regarding everyone's opinion as if they are very wrong and yours like the absolutely right, don't be surprised if I don't appear in one of your CRTs in the future
You don't have to if you don't want to, your fault.
And yes, I'd say with confidence that I am in fact correct here.
It's an outlier feat with no others to support Argenti & co being on that level, and it by wiki standards should not scale to that level.
Don't worry, btw, I really dislike you You arrogant with superiority complex
@Enryu_The_Red_Tower @AvengershowsI dunno if this is the right place to ask considering no warning need to be given, but i think both @Enryu_The_Red_Tower and @Avengershows need to be put on blocklist on each other because of their hostility on this thread: https://vsbattles.com/threads/honkai-star-rail-discussion-thread.153196/page-34
Both are very important users for HSR right now but it's clear they really don't want to work together and i fear this hostility will continue when they meet eye to eye again
I think people are overreacting at the way I talk, it's just how I talk and phrase myself.
They asked me to not call them annoying, which I did not do.I mean, I don't think whether you violated a rule or not is really what's in question, because you quite clearly did. If someone asks you to stop responding in a certain manner, you don't just keep doing it.
It's really just a matter of what needs to be done here. I'd support a light warning for both parties. If they wish to not speak with each other, I'm fine with having them blocked from seeing each other's messages if supported by other staff. However, I'd be careful with this, as I feel we've used that feature more liberally as of recently - and if anything, I'd like to dial it back so as to not cause a slippery slope.
I personally consider it better to use this option for members who are generally well-behaved, but are consistently enraged into bad behaviour by very specific other members.If they wish to not speak with each other, I'm fine with having them blocked from seeing each other's messages if supported by other staff. However, I'd be careful with this, as I feel we've used that feature more liberally as of recently - and if anything, I'd like to dial it back so as to not cause a slippery slope.
Generally speaking, I agree with this sentiment. I suppose my main concern is it potentially becoming so frequent that it could interfere with discussions and the like due to swaths of members not seeing each other's messages. Though, that is admittedly a slippery slope that's a ways off from becoming reality.I personally consider it better to use this option for members who are generally well-behaved, but are consistently enraged into bad behaviour by very specific other members.
I don't necessarily see how it's doubling down, I do admit that my wording could've been better and that it definitely didn't garner a positive energy, however as I've said, I did not intend nor did insult Enryu personally, but just expressed that I disliked this one specific thing he did because it caused me irritation. I have respect for Enryu as a person and as a scaler, one disagreement won't change that.Avengershows doubling down, on the other hand, has me more concerned
I'm pretty sure she was handed a topic ban and an outright ban before because of this exact reason. And it's shown she is not willing to change over it.I'd support either a topic ban or a straight up ban, as she's continuously done this despite previous warnings, topic bans, and even an outright ban if I remember correctly
I'd support either a topic ban or a straight up ban, as she's continuously done this despite previous warnings, topic bans, and even an outright ban if I remember correctly
Since Bambu brought it up, they did got previously reported earlier in this threadVaguely recall they were reported a week or two ago
I've closed the thread.Would this affect anything?
I Want To Report A Staff Member
He closed my post because the evidence was "poor". When in fact he didn't refute a single one of them which are in verse statement and showings, but closed it with power abuse. The following staff needs a warning: @CloverDragon03 for dismising factual evidence for the retcon as shown in the...vsbattles.com
I've closed the thread.
I don't want to hide evidence that could affect their punishment here - I'm pretty sure the thread will be deleted once a judgement has been handed out.Shouldn't the thread be deleted rather considering how it contains insult to particular community and the entire site.
I think she should be permanently banned from vsbtles for insulting us, since she can't get better.I don't want to hide evidence that could affect their punishment here - I'm pretty sure the thread will be deleted once a judgement has been handed out.
I understand this site is a joke, garbage and a laughing stock to Reddit, Youtube, Kazenshuu with this shit