- 16,093
- 12,577
No, that's the whole problem. What do you consider is a "peak human" shooting feat and what do you consider to be significantly higher? Is winning a firefight against three-five people a superhuman feat? Most people wouldn't consider it such given it's very common in fiction but it's basically impossible in real life. Consistently landing headshots on enemies is basically impossible in a hectic firefight (to the point that people are actively trained not to do it) but it's so common in fiction that you wouldn't want to give "Superhuman Precision" to literally everyone that does, considering that it is all technically feasible, just impractical unless you had very superhuman aim. Sniping someone from 1 km away might seem possible given that the record is 2+km but if the conditions are (not) right (wind, small timeframe, poor visibility, etc) it might be completely impossible, there's way too many factors going into something for it to be a good idea to make saying "yes this is/isn't superhuman" to such feats a common function of profile-making. The more complex you make standards the more people are going to get it wrong.I think it's pretty easy to tell whether or not a feat counts as superhuman. Could you give an example of something that'd be on the edge?