- 3,302
- 1,281
I am talking about this rule. The rule that destroying multiple sets of infinite universes = the same destroying one set of infinite universes because infinite = infinity.
Now, I understand the math behind it and the concept the rule is trying to say but it doesn't make sense with the rest of the site's cosmology ratings. For example:
Under that same rule of math, an Infinite Universe would equal the same as an infinite multiverse. Yet we don't tier them as equal.
For universes: We have another rule that claims you cannot jump from low 2-C to 2-C via multipliers because the space between universes is indefinite. If this is the case, isn't the distance between one multiverse and another be also indefinite?
If you can't stack multipliers so that no amount of extra power can make a Low 2-C character 2-C, even infinite multipliers, why is that destroying one set of infinite multiverses = destroying multiple sets of infinite universes?
Now, I understand the math behind it and the concept the rule is trying to say but it doesn't make sense with the rest of the site's cosmology ratings. For example:
Under that same rule of math, an Infinite Universe would equal the same as an infinite multiverse. Yet we don't tier them as equal.
For universes: We have another rule that claims you cannot jump from low 2-C to 2-C via multipliers because the space between universes is indefinite. If this is the case, isn't the distance between one multiverse and another be also indefinite?
If you can't stack multipliers so that no amount of extra power can make a Low 2-C character 2-C, even infinite multipliers, why is that destroying one set of infinite multiverses = destroying multiple sets of infinite universes?