Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
maybe? By that the natture of her NEP would be 3 as she is also a story (the final one) herselfOkay, it may be a stretch again but i think Shiro (or The Epilogue) should get NEP aspect type 5 plot? Since from the statement above, it was mention that The Epilogue always stand at the end of the story as a whole, in theory, since The Epilogue always stand at the end, there's no plot left to be manipulated in The Epilogue itself
By this reasoning, can Shiro get NEP aspect type 5?
No NEP?Dang guess new nep ruined it for her in that regard.
And yes this would be the new strongest isekai with shiro
At least not on nature type, but there's a good possibility for the NEP aspectNo NEP?
How do you interpret ever-expending as 1-C?After looking through the comments, I think Shirou being 1-A is valid. I still don't think Nebula should be any higher than High 1-C because I don't see anything to affirm her being 1-B/Low 1-A.
Because "Ever-Expanding Multidimensional Omnipotence" does not mean anything by itself, it is just a name the author came up with to describe the Epilogue's boundlessness. There is nothing to imply that there is a recursive, infinite hierarchy of dimensions each being ontologically greater than the other, that is an assumption even the OP admits is potentially faulty. For that reason, I have no reason to accept High 1-B/Low 1-A for Nebula. However, it is likely that there is an immense difference between Higher-Order Multidimensional Omnipotence and Ever-Expanding Omnipotence like between the former and Beyond Omnipotence as the OP guessed. Hence I felt that Nebula being 10-D was reasonable.How do you interpret ever-expending as 1-C?
So the order is this right?
Strongest imaginable (nebula probably here)> beyond ever expanding > beyond higher order > beyond multi omnipotent > beyond omnipotent (makina) > omnipotent > quasi omnipotent > new (quasi/transcendence) god
You misunderstood the OP's problem. It's whether Nebula would scale above those beings or not based on the evidence that is presented in the novel currently. It's pretty clear what Ever-Expending Multidimensional Omnipotence is supposed to mean in the context of the explanation and the novel but I digress I guess.Because "Ever-Expanding Multidimensional Omnipotence" does not mean anything by itself, it is just a name the author came up with to describe the Epilogue's boundlessness. There is nothing to imply that there is a recursive, infinite hierarchy of dimensions each being ontologically greater than the other, that is an assumption even the OP admits is potentially faulty. For that reason, I have no reason to accept High 1-B/Low 1-A for Nebula. However, it is likely that there is an immense difference between Higher-Order Multidimensional Omnipotence and Ever-Expanding Omnipotence like between the former and Beyond Omnipotence as the OP guessed. Hence I felt that Nebula being 10-D was reasonable.
Although, as I look back on it, I am wrong in saying Nebula is 10-D because I think I miscounted how many layers of transcendence there is. Can someone make it clear?
Nebula would scale above them, but she would not be High 1-B/Low 1-A because of lack of evidence. Hence I believe they would be High 1-C or the like instead. Anyways, I am unfollowing and will not respond anymore. Good luck.Neutral on NEP stuff, we need someone to evaluate it. After that we can probably apply this.
You misunderstood the OP's problem. It's whether Nebula would scale above those beings or not based on the evidence that is presented in the novel currently. It's pretty clear what Ever-Expending Multidimensional Omnipotence is supposed to mean in the context of the explanation and the novel but I digress I guess.