• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

MCU: High 6-A/5-C Upgrades

Status
Not open for further replies.
Anyways to restate what I said before, I'm completely against the upgrades. They rely on out-of-context scenes, unreliable narrators, and bad scaling in my view. The only legit stuff I can get is the 5-C stuff, which while also inconsistent at least has the benefit of statements and a lack of clear anti-feats. But that wouldn't scale to anyone and the most that it would lead to is Power Stone users getting a 5-C durability rating or something.
 
It actually makes it unusable, since we have rules against badgering authors for battle boarding quotes.
I Never “badgered” her, I DM’d her and she was chill about it.


I'm pretty sure this can result in permaban but I'll give him the benefit of the doubt that he probably doesn't know the rules about WoG
Well if that’s true then that’s some BS. Would you mind linking me to this rules then
 
Badgered was a term I shouldn't have used, but it's against the rules to directly ask an author about power scaling statements solely for an upgrade. Which is what you were doing.
How? Authors/creators are never just gonna answer a question exactly the way you want 100% of the time. Sometimes they might say the exact opposite of what you want or something entirely you didn’t expect. So basically if I ever want to use an actual WoG I have to dance around my actual question?
 
How? Authors/creators are never just gonna answer a question exactly the way you want 100% of the time. Sometimes they might say the exact opposite of what you want or something entirely you didn’t expect. So basically if I ever want to use an actual WoG I have to dance around my actual question?
Just don’t ask them about power scaling.
 
Also got this new statement

8731665-4a8a70ef-c426-4c76-a478-cceaed48f81f.jpeg
Personally I wouldn't have asked her about if the power of each character in the show is one for one for them in the Sacred Timeline like this but instead ask "when writing the show did you write every character with the intention of them being one to one with the Sacred Timeline", that way if she said yes to that too we'd be able to use that to justify Captain Marvel's feat along with it coming off less like we're only trying to get an upgrade.
 
Personally I wouldn't have asked her about if the powers of the characters in the show are one for one but if when writing the show did you write every character with the intention of them being one to one with the Sacred Timeline MCU, if she said yes to that too we'd be able to use that to justify Captain Marvel's feat along with it coming off less like we're only trying to get an upgrade.
I mean that’s basically what she said, they wanted to keep the characters one to one with there mainline counterparts and make the changes in personality seem plausible and they did the same for power lvls. I mean isn’t that the point of WoG though?
 
I mean that’s basically what she said, they wanted to keep the characters one to one with there mainline counterparts and make the changes in personality seem plausible and they did the same for power lvls. I mean isn’t that the point of WoG though?
No totally but I'm only saying this cause of the rules on this wiki that I just found out about, personally I think it should be able to be used but idk about everybody else
 
honestly there's probably an interview where AC Bradley answered a similar question that we could've just used instead rather than approaching her
 
Ita always a problem. We had a Staff thread on this.

Because you asked a leading question and did so because an upgrade thread you wanted to get passed was going to be rejected.

This statement can't be used per the previous ruling.
Ok and? Would I still get penalized if I brought in any other new source of evidence like a guidebook or something.

what ruling? Can you link me to the rules so I can read this myself
 
Basically

1. It can't be a leading question just for the sake of battleboarding or to get a personally-motivating answer (It is)

2. It must only be related to clarification on stuff that already exists within the actual source material (It doesn't, since scaling is a one-way street due to the whole "Variants" thing)

3. It CANNOT, IN ANY GOOD CONSCIENCE, CONTRADICT THE SOURCE MATERIAL WHATSOEVER. (Which it does when you go scaling What If to the canon MCU)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top