Jinsye
She/Her- 10,439
- 1,540
- Thread starter
- #81
Ink on paper isn't fictional either. It's not the medium, but the ideas behind the medium. Data is capable of expressing the very same things that books can, saying that one can be R>F and the other can't be make little to no sense.Data isn't fictional though. Its just data, which isn't a dimensionality lower or anything. Rewriting code is just a specific interaction with that world. The IRL player is just a 3-Dimensional human with no indication that they have god-like power or anything.
Plus, viewing a timeline as data is indeed a showing of qualitative superiority. You cannot fit an entire timeline into a computer without being a lower plane of existence compared to you.
Think about it this way, an entire timeline is a 4-Dimensional and infinite. However, if you see it as finite and 3-D, then you have qualitative superiority over it. Because no matter how many numbers you multiply that timeline it won't make it stop being finite and 3-D from your perspective. The only
If we assume the 'world' is literally an electron moving through the computer, then it would be 3-D from perspective of the higher world. Thus, if that electron is literally a timeline then qualitative superiority can be assumed.
If it is below the baseline reality, we'd default to tier 11 by default. You would need a damn good argument for the baseline reality to be tier 1.Also is it necessary to have R>F Transcendence as tier 1 necessarily? Lower world itself can be just 2d or 1d R>F shouldn't be tier 1 in that case.