• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Rule Violation Reports (New forum)

Arceus0x said:
AI slop CRT
vsbattles.com

Raimi Spider-Man and Mcu Spider-Man High Complex Multiversal

ARGUMENT 1: DORMAMMU Ryan Meinerding, Vice President of Visual Development and Creative Director at Marvel Studios, says Dormammu is 11D, which makes Dormammu H1C ** https://comicvine.gamespot.com/a/uploads/original/11164/111644289/9376504-080567da-109b-4989-b0f0-b04edb0d7508.jpeg ** **...
vsbattles.com vsbattles.com
Click to expand...
I dont think it is AI. There are really these type of Guys. and the Scale also looks like a Discord slop. But the Answers are Pretty sure AI
 
KaramcaS said:
I dont think it is AI. There are really these type of Guys. and the Scale also looks like a Discord slop. But the Answers are Pretty sure AI
Click to expand...
he has a replies from chat gpt in the text of the CRT and shit like "killing is actually bad" in itallics in the middle of the thread.
 
@EfeTahir7 Please don't make nonsensical content revisions.

Ignoring the fact that you clearly generated it with AI, it makes absurd statements like that Spider-Man should scale to the infinity stones because he supposedly briefly resisted being turned into dust, and is furthermore an absolute mess with no clear summary.
 
EfeTahir7 said:
I am not used ai and Even Spider-Man's brief resistance to the rocks puts him at least on that level, and nothing you said is a debunk.
Click to expand...
You literally left the initial part of its response in there. "Understood. Here is the text with the corrected style, maintaining all links and the original structure:"

Regardless, we have certain discussion rules which were not followed, for example: "The opening post of a content revision thread has to include a clear summary in the opening post what major changes are being made so that everyone involved in the discussion will be on the same page."

You need to read through and understand our policies and make a well-constructed post if you want to be taken seriously.

That includes our Site Rules, our Discussion Rules, and all the stuff in the Welcome Message.
 
FinePoint said:
@EfeTahir7 Please don't make nonsensical content revisions.

Ignoring the fact that you clearly generated it with AI, it makes absurd statements like that Spider-Man should scale to the infinity stones because he supposedly briefly resisted being turned into dust, and is furthermore an absolute mess with no clear summary.
Click to expand...
I haven't used artificial intelligence and Even Spider-Man's brief resistance to the Infinity Stones puts him at least on the level of H1C, and Nothing you said is a refutation ; you just don't want to accept it right now.
 
FinePoint said:
You literally left the initial part of its response in there. "Understood. Here is the text with the corrected style, maintaining all links and the original structure:"

Regardless, we have certain discussion rules which were not followed, for example: "The opening post of a content revision thread has to include a clear summary in the opening post what major changes are being made so that everyone involved in the discussion will be on the same page."

You need to read through and understand our policies and make a well-constructed post if you want to be taken seriously.

That includes our Site Rules, our Discussion Rules, and all the stuff in the Welcome Message.
Click to expand...
I only use translation, I never use artificial intelligence.
 
EfeTahir7 said:
I only use translation, I never use artificial intelligence.
Click to expand...
It's not against our rules to use AI regardless, but I'm telling you that your thread was low-quality and not in compliance with our discussion rules.

This thread is not the place to debate it. If you remake your thread in a proper format then I'll be happy to reject it there and explain to you in detail my reasoning.
 
FinePoint said:
Yapay zekâ kullanımı kurallarımıza aykırı değil, ancak size şunu söylemek istiyorum ki, açtığınız konu düşük kaliteliydi ve tartışma kurallarımıza uymuyordu.

Bu konu başlığı, bu tartışma için uygun bir yer değil. Eğer konu başlığınızı uygun bir formatta yeniden oluşturursanız, orada reddetmekten ve gerekçelerimi ayrıntılı olarak açıklamaktan memnuniyet duyarım.
Click to expand...
I didn't actually use AI, I just used translation, and what exactly didn't you like about the discussion I started? Because instead of counter-arguments, people kept writing sarcastic things like "son."
 
EfeTahir7 said:
Gerçekten yapay zeka kullanmadım, sadece çeviri kullandım ve başlattığım tartışmada tam olarak neyi beğenmediniz? Çünkü karşı argümanlar yerine sürekli "Oğlum" gibi alaycı şeyler yazılıyordu.
Click to expand...
It needs to start or end with a summary. You should include which characters are being affected, along with a short explanation why.

In addition, though not technically required, it would help a lot if you reformatted it so that it was easier to read. Right now there's a lot of random bolding and too many line breaks and stuff.

I merely closed it for now, it's not deleted. If you add a summary and clean it up the best you can I'll re-open it.

I'll also tell the people there to be constructive and stop just making fun of you.
 
FinePoint said:
It needs to start or end with a summary. You should include which characters are being affected, along with a short explanation why.

In addition, though not technically required, it would help a lot if you reformatted it so that it was easier to read. Right now there's a lot of random bolding and too many line breaks and stuff.

I merely closed it for now, it's not deleted. If you add a summary and clean it up the best you can I'll re-open it.

I'll also tell the people there to be constructive and stop just making fun of you.
Click to expand...
Ty and I'll do as you say and start a new post
 
Hello all. This is me notifying the thread of action taken: after some discussion, we have banned @QualifiedDunlin100 for being a sockpuppet account of @Mizuki67; Mizuki has also been banned, as this is not the first time this sort of occurrence has occurred. In the past, there have been several alt accounts, including at least one banned for vandalism and poor behavior; at the time, satisfactory evidence was given to suggest it was a different person, though now, looking back, I suspect it was not.

While we have quietly banned many of the sockpuppets associated with Mizuki67 over the years, several have avoided appropriate detection, and as I go through this, these following accounts also have extremely damning evidence suggesting they are also sockpuppets of Mizuki67:
  • Tempestdragon6
  • CielTempest2
  • Jozaysmith? (it is worth noting, Jozaysmith? and Mizuki67 have been litigated as sockpuppets in the past and found to be different people, in spite of the evidence)
...as well as about half a dozen accounts that never made it onto the forum in the first place.

In any case, they are gone. That is all.
 
Last edited:
Mr. Bambu said:
While we have quietly banned many of the sockpuppets associated with Mizuki67 over the years, several have avoided appropriate detection, and as I go through this, these following accounts also have extremely damning evidence suggesting they are also sockpuppets of Mizuki67:
  • Tempestdragon6
  • CielTempest2
  • Jozaysmith?
Click to expand...
I know it’s not my place to reply but to be on the safer side would it be possible to run a check on @Yama1op too? This isn’t me accusing Tensura supporters of conspiring and abetting sock puppetry but this account has no comment history and AFAIK they were present in my report that had to do with certain Tensura supporters, iirc I saw them liking a message but my memory is limited. I don’t actually remember what messaged they liked but I do have a screenshot of them liking a message. It’s really odd and while I don’t want to make assumptions it could very much be used as a placeholder to avoid punishment.

Edit I had forgotten I had screenshots saved somewhere and happened to find these. It’s really strange that all the messages he’s contributing to are from Tensura supporters. It’s even stranger that they came back after 3 years to purely like comments too. I feel as though this isn’t some coincidence and there’s definitely something off.
 
Last edited:
Gamin_Yoon23 said:
I know it’s not my place to reply but to be on the safer side would it be possible to run a check on @Yama1op too? This isn’t me accusing Tensura supporters of conspiring and abetting sock puppetry but this account has no comment history and AFAIK they were present in my report that had to do with certain Tensura supporters, iirc I saw them liking a message but my memory is limited. I don’t actually remember what messaged they liked but I do have a screenshot of them liking a message. It’s really odd and while I don’t want to make assumptions it could very much be used as a placeholder to avoid punishment.

Edit I had forgotten I had screenshots saved somewhere and happened to find these. It’s really strange that all the messages he’s contributing to are from Tensura supporters. It’s even stranger that they came back after 3 years to purely like comments too. I feel as though this isn’t some coincidence and there’s definitely something off.
Click to expand...
This is not to say certainly no, but the detection method that picked up all of Mizuki's alt accounts does not detect the same sockpuppetry with Yama1op.
 
I knew the new guy was sus, but I just couldn't prove it
Mr. Bambu said:
Tempestdragon6
Click to expand...
Question: has the system detected dragon to be an alt of jozay recently or from a long time ago?

If it's the latter than I'd like to mention that this was a case sometimes in the past (more than an year ago, I think) about sharing accounts but was ultimately resolved in this very RvR. Not sure if dragon went astray again though, but they do occasionally come online.

(I've seen both dragon and jozay and their real life selves so I can at least confirm they're different people)
 
Astral_Trinity439 said:
I knew the new guy was sus, but I just couldn't prove it

Question: has the system detected dragon to be an alt of jozay recently or from a long time ago?

If it's the latter than I'd like to mention that this was a case sometimes in the past (more than an year ago, I think) about sharing accounts but was ultimately resolved in this very RvR. Not sure if dragon went astray again though, but they do occasionally come online.

(I've seen both dragon and jozay and their real life selves so I can at least confirm they're different people)
Click to expand...
I'm aware of the Jozaysmith thing, and that it was resolved in this RVR by AKM confirming over Discord. Given the massive interconnections found between their accounts, it was my belief they were the same individual, though it isn't really relevant to the matter at hand, as both accounts have a fairly massive web of interconnecting accounts across the past few years.
 
Gamin_Yoon23 said:
I know it’s not my place to reply but to be on the safer side would it be possible to run a check on @Yama1op too? This isn’t me accusing Tensura supporters of conspiring and abetting sock puppetry but this account has no comment history and AFAIK they were present in my report that had to do with certain Tensura supporters, iirc I saw them liking a message but my memory is limited. I don’t actually remember what messaged they liked but I do have a screenshot of them liking a message. It’s really odd and while I don’t want to make assumptions it could very much be used as a placeholder to avoid punishment.

Edit I had forgotten I had screenshots saved somewhere and happened to find these. It’s really strange that all the messages he’s contributing to are from Tensura supporters. It’s even stranger that they came back after 3 years to purely like comments too. I feel as though this isn’t some coincidence and there’s definitely something off.
Click to expand...
I mainly use this account just to view CRT and don't actively participate because it doesn't really interest me. That's allowed, right?
 
I would like to make a report on @ExcelsisBerny due to this comment. I was being extremely kind throughout this thread and even said this;

Just referencing the recent derailment, please don’t derail from this point. I’m pretty sure the OP is currently asleep and anymore clogging will become an eyesore to look at. State your stance and reasoning and leave it at that unless another comment is called for. Currently neutral, I haven’t got the chance to read through everything but I think I see what’s going on here.
Click to expand...
3 minutes after Excel decided to say this;

ExcelsisBerny said:
If the same level of scrutiny applied to DBS were applied to DBH, the verse would not have even half the hax it currently has. I have taken a look at more pages of the verse, and I genuinely do not understand how some things were accepted
Click to expand...
While there are things I particularly don’t understand too due to being misinformed or just not seeing it entirely, I think it would have been best to keep that comment elsewhere. A discussion thread where things can be discussed out in the open without the fear of it being called for “derailing” or “clogging.” The thread has its own topic and Excel’s comment may apply to the thread it’s still a form of derailment. Whatever misunderstandings he had could’ve been cleared up elsewhere.

I would also like to note that while his comment towards myself might be seen as little but it really isn’t. While Excel might be telling me to calm down “cry” really wasn’t necessary and I’ve noticed a trend of people saying this to be provocative. If you want someone to calm down you tell them to calm down. You don’t tell them to stop crying. It’s exaggerating.

I would also like to say that while my comment wasn’t necessary either I decided to say it since derailing seems to be common on Dragon Ball threads and it’s getting tiring. As for the other comment I made I can attest again that it wasn’t necessary either but I stand with myself when I say I was being respectful and kind throughout all of this.
 
Gamin_Yoon23 said:
I would like to make a report on @ExcelsisBerny due to this comment. I was being extremely kind throughout this thread and even said this;


3 minutes after Excel decided to say this;


While there are things I particularly don’t understand too due to being misinformed or just not seeing it entirely, I think it would have been best to keep that comment elsewhere. A discussion thread where things can be discussed out in the open without the fear of it being called for “derailing” or “clogging.” The thread has its own topic and Excel’s comment may apply to the thread it’s still a form of derailment. Whatever misunderstandings he had could’ve been cleared up elsewhere.

I would also like to note that while his comment towards myself might be seen as little but it really isn’t. While Excel might be telling me to calm down “cry” really wasn’t necessary and I’ve noticed a trend of people saying this to be provocative. If you want someone to calm down you tell them to calm down. You don’t tell them to stop crying. It’s exaggerating.

I would also like to say that while my comment wasn’t necessary either I decided to say it since derailing seems to be common on Dragon Ball threads and it’s getting tiring. As for the other comment I made I can attest again that it wasn’t necessary either but I stand with myself when I say I was being respectful and kind throughout all of this.
Click to expand...
It seems to be a derailment, but I'm sorry, I don't see a rule violation here.
 
Random-Helper323 said:
It seems to be a derailment, but I'm sorry, I don't see a rule violation here.
Click to expand...
That’s okay I don’t think a rule violation is needed on a second look but it’s just strange how derailment has been told to stop once but it keeps continuing. There is another instance of this happening too with the same user but I’ll keep it to myself since I don’t think it’s too necessary to raise here. I still don’t think her comment was appropriate and would like for you to ask her to stop. She should also drop that tone too. If she’s going to tell people to relax she needs to learn how to speak to people without involving subtle provocative attacks.
 
Last edited:
Gamin_Yoon23 said:
That’s okay I don’t think a rule violation is needed on a second look but it’s just strange how derailment has been told to stop once but it keeps continuing.
Click to expand...
It is hard to drop a subject just because it's off-topic, but yes, derailing is best avoided.
Gamin_Yoon23 said:
There is another instance of this happening too with the same user but I’ll keep it to myself since I don’t think it’s too necessary to raise here. I still don’t think her comment was appropriate and would like for you to ask him to stop. She should also drop that tone too. If she’s going to tell people to relax she needs to learn how to speak to people without involving subtle provocative attacks.
Click to expand...
Those kinds of comments are antagonistic, but they are allowed, although discouraged.
 
Random-Helper323 said:
It is hard to drop a subject just because it's off-topic, but yes, derailing is best avoided.
Click to expand...
I agree. By that point we can only get staff to intervene and I did do the action of messaging one to delete all of our comments but they seem to be busy from the looks of it.
Random-Helper323 said:
Those kinds of comments are antagonistic, but they are allowed, although discouraged.
Click to expand...
Would this still apply if it’s excessive? Going by memory I don’t think this is a one off. While it is discouraged it makes a lot more sense to drop any antagonistic impulses when someone has kindly asked you to stop derailing and are being kind in general. I could honestly understand her replying in such if I was being rude since some people have a 0 disrespect policy but that isn’t present here. I’ve lost my cool before but my cool is completely in control here.
 
FinePoint said:
Derailment is a rule violation, and so is being needlessly rude.

I'll agree it's minor here, but we can still step in and repeat the sentiment with authority, which I will do.
Click to expand...
Another comment and they’re deciding not to backdown or apologise but stoop lower. Does this constitute to a rule violation at this point?
 
Gamin_Yoon23 said:
Another comment and they’re deciding not to backdown or apologise but stoop lower. Does this constitute to a rule violation at this point?
Click to expand...
Well, they've just done what I've asked in a humorous and literal way.

I'll clarify what I mean, and if they don't stop after that then maybe.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Agnaa
Fanart Rule Revamp
Replies
7
Views
2K
Antvasima
Antvasima
FinePoint
  • Locked
Clarifying Death Threat Rules
2
Replies
64
Views
6K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Kachon123
One Piece: Planet Size Discussion Rule
Replies
14
Views
2K
RaikiKurohane99
RaikiKurohane99
StarShooter80
Establishing Gap Needed for LS Stomps
Replies
13
Views
939
Qawsedf234
Qawsedf234
Agnaa
  • Locked
Controversial Powers on New Pages - Editing Rules Tweak
2
Replies
69
Views
8K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Back
Top