• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

VS Battles Wiki Forum

Drite77
Drite77
I'm at work and won't be able to tackle this in a few hours, but why are you recalcing the feat? Ugarik said assuming 180 degrees was wrong. On top of that, the scan you posted does not state 100 slashes in an instant, it states 100 slashes in a second, it's completely different. Specially once the people who previously calced it counted less then 50 slashes
Kachon123
Kachon123
Ugarik's calc is old and came out before the chapter I used as direct support of the Atomic Slash using 180 degree slashes came from. I'm recalcing the feat because this also uses far less pixel scaling, which has room for error. Since there's a direct statement of the Atomic Slash having 100 slashes, I don't see why not to just use it.

It says "in a second" but it also claims that it happens faster than the opponent can blink so the way I interpreted that was to just show that the Atomic Slash is 100 cuts in a very short timeframe/an instant. Since we have the timeframe of before the soundspeed sword can cut, I think applying the 100 cuts statement works
Drite77
Drite77
I can buy using 180 degrees, but not so much 100 when we already have 2 people that counted 44 slashes, so I would prefer if that vallue was used instead
Back
Top