No, just to make sure everything is fair as well as tag the necessary people’s input needed to get it evaluated. A lot of times the staff just air or disagree with my proposals without any debunks or counter arguments. Basically they can’t debunk it but because they’re staff, my proposal doesn’t matter.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
VS Battles Wiki Forum
Mr. Bambu
man that seems loaded
I don't know which staff you've been working with but the end goal of a CRT is not really to facilitate a debate, rather it is to decide what seems right. The goal of any given debate is to convince the audience- the staff are that audience in this case, your goal isn't to argue with 'em but rather to convince 'em. Looking at your CRT, only KLOL spoke on it before you went to staff walls (at least mine and Qawsedf's, it seems), and while he has the right to speak on his opinion, he isn't part of the evaluating staff- he can't just shut down the CRT, he's just speaking his mind.
Your thread can be rejected or approved by thread moderators, administrators, or bureaucrats. Other staff ranks can speak on it (obviously) but have no authority over it.
I'll look through your tags now, I guess.
I don't know which staff you've been working with but the end goal of a CRT is not really to facilitate a debate, rather it is to decide what seems right. The goal of any given debate is to convince the audience- the staff are that audience in this case, your goal isn't to argue with 'em but rather to convince 'em. Looking at your CRT, only KLOL spoke on it before you went to staff walls (at least mine and Qawsedf's, it seems), and while he has the right to speak on his opinion, he isn't part of the evaluating staff- he can't just shut down the CRT, he's just speaking his mind.
Your thread can be rejected or approved by thread moderators, administrators, or bureaucrats. Other staff ranks can speak on it (obviously) but have no authority over it.
I'll look through your tags now, I guess.
sageof8paths
Thank you. What I basically meant was while trying to convince the staff, sometimes they just stop replying and it appears like they have no logical debunk and disagree just because they don’t like it. But Qawsedf is not who I was referring to.
Mr. Bambu
Aye, I figured as much, as he had just replied.
Not all discussions can be swayed. Sometimes a staff member decides that it is what it is. Many will avoid extended engagements in threads, adding a second unfortunate factor to the equation. Good luck with your thread- only one tag was weird ("Snyderverse"), since that doesn't correlate to anything we use on the wiki, so I removed it.
Not all discussions can be swayed. Sometimes a staff member decides that it is what it is. Many will avoid extended engagements in threads, adding a second unfortunate factor to the equation. Good luck with your thread- only one tag was weird ("Snyderverse"), since that doesn't correlate to anything we use on the wiki, so I removed it.
Are you asking for an evaluation?