You can't really do muhh about it, it's how the wiki works. There were some stuff that (privately) told me they agreed, but they didn't actively take part in the argument since as soon as AKM agreed with deletion, it was a done deal.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
VS Battles Wiki Forum
Ricsi-viragosi
Mr. Bambu
I apologize that you feel that way. You were outvoted both in terms of overall users and staff. For important decisions we cannot simply allow them to be stonewalled forever. At some point a consensus must be reached. That was the case here.
Debating isn't the sole intent of the community- though, if that is your one and only interest, VS matches may be more up your alley, where one can afford to be less objective. CRTs and profiles need to be correct. A debate does not always change what is believed to be correct. If you decide to leave that's fair, many do. Cheers.
Debating isn't the sole intent of the community- though, if that is your one and only interest, VS matches may be more up your alley, where one can afford to be less objective. CRTs and profiles need to be correct. A debate does not always change what is believed to be correct. If you decide to leave that's fair, many do. Cheers.
Ricsi-viragosi
Yes, but the request was to provide sources for your claims.
Me posting all your comments was not to say "oh look, you weren't arguing for most of the time", it was to point out that you simply started claiming WoG without any actual given quotes.
Which is what happened on the crt. You said WoG says its non-literal, and then majority said to delete it based on that, without any sources given, and then refusing to post sources.
Me posting all your comments was not to say "oh look, you weren't arguing for most of the time", it was to point out that you simply started claiming WoG without any actual given quotes.
Which is what happened on the crt. You said WoG says its non-literal, and then majority said to delete it based on that, without any sources given, and then refusing to post sources.
Mr. Bambu
I wasn't the one that provided the WoG statements though. I was just the one bringing them up. I think I mentioned this in the thread but I wasn't the sole defender of deletion side, lad, you need to understand that. It's not solely my argument.
If y'all feel you need to leave over the thread, as I said, good luck to you. But you're going to lose arguments. Shit happens, not everyone is going to come out of these things pleased because pleasing everyone is simply impossible. Cheers, though.
If y'all feel you need to leave over the thread, as I said, good luck to you. But you're going to lose arguments. Shit happens, not everyone is going to come out of these things pleased because pleasing everyone is simply impossible. Cheers, though.