This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Hello everybody!
Antvasima has reached over 400,000 wiki edits!
Big congratulations to him and massive thanks for serving this community for over 10 years now! It's not a stretch to say that he has been one of the most important people to ever wander around this corner of the internet and make...
Let's let people decide first. I agree that there is no rush and we don't have to start doing everything right now. We should focus on archival and then we can take further steps after we reach a proper conclusion of where to shift all of it.
In an ideal scenario, I would have agreed with this. But it is too unrealistic to come out with a proper set of rules that cover all bases and even then people can find ways to get around them. It will become too much of an overhead just to discuss if a single page should be deleted or not every...
I have read the thread till now and one can note that I have no horse in this race. I have always been rather indifferent about it in the past. Looking at the arguments I lean on Bambu's side of arguments and I do feel that a significant influence of our wiki has poured over to SCP and not in...
I agree with calling it Notable Matchups.
Let me know if there are any issues with AWB. Anyway, I think this change should not be very difficult to handle.
I am deeply saddened to get this news. I always knew a day will come when the great man will pass away but I never thought it will be so sudden, so soon, and that it will hurt this much. This man has touched the lives of so many people around the world, it's crazy. If you are here and reading...
Hi everybody!
On behalf of all the bureaucrats, I bring you another batch of staff promotions after getting input from most of our current staff members.
Administrator: @Dereck03
Thread Moderator: @AbaddonTheDisappointment
Calc Group Members: @Chariot190 and @SunDaGamer
These are well...
Hi everybody!
On behalf of all the bureaucrats, I bring you another batch of staff promotions after getting input from most of our current staff members.
Administrators: @DarkGrath
Content Moderators: @Catzlaflame, @ImmortalDread and @GarrixianXD
Thread Moderator: @Propellus
Calc Group...
I think everybody is on the same page regarding the wiki policies.
And I agree that things like veto shouldn't be a thing in verse-specific CRTs.
Verse-specific discussion rules like the ones listed here should be decided by the agreement of staff and community...
Hi everybody! How's it going?
It's THAT time again. On behalf of all the bureaucrats, I bring you another batch of staff promotions after getting input from most of our current staff members.
Administrators: @Agnaa and @Just_a_Random_Butler
Content Moderators: @Therefir and...
Content Moderators are well-versed with site standards as they specialize in a very important aspect of the site, i.e. the pages. It's not a simple job. It's justified that they get a say in site-standards. Thread evaluation is just one pillar of the site, while page maintenance is equally...
I think General Discussions already works for this. You can create threads there regarding such discussions. It is not really needed. But if majority of the people want it, it doesn't do any harm either.
We lowball by default unless sufficient evidence/backing is present to go any higher. Especially in these cases we need to be more strict. Agnaa has answered this above satisfactorily. We shouldn't make higher assumptions/interpretations than the minimum viable one.
I am in agreement with DT here. I have always been on the side of "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence". For such a high tier, I don't think simple statements are sufficient. The context should be provided in detail for us to ascertain if it exactly matches our requirements. Not...
The draft looks okay to me. One point that can be added there is that in case of works that have already been officially translated, we don't claim that the TH team is more skilled than the official translators but there might be some errors that the TH team can help clarify given enough...