This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
These will be my last comments here, because I'm really not interested that much in this. Im
1.2.3 ) was due to Hakai affecting space-time (stated by Beerus and confirmed by Goku Black who survived thanks to the Time Ring, literally has acausality for that) and because of Trunks.
4) I don't...
It's effectively not a time paradox. What Beerus did is cause and effect. His action (erasing Zamasu) led to another (parallel world). You keep saying it's due to Trunks when it's effectively Beerus who ended up splitting it. It's directly stated by Whis, and no matter how you twist it, it was...
Not what I said. I said parallel worlds,not Time Rings. Don't put words into my mouth. In fact, Null's explanation about Hakai affecting space-time is much more consistent, if we're going down that route.
By your logic, if Trunks was indeed the cause of it, that means the world where Zamasu...
No problem. I knew of the Hakai point, which is what I waited for. I used it since we don't accept Hakai having an effect on space-time (due to Future Zamasu surviving ig?) which is weird.
And...??? Beerus did that by himself. Even assuming said event only happened thanks to Trunks, Beerus' action shouldn't have branched the timeline, which is the focal point here. In a multiverse where only time travel splits the timeline, such an action should have not,yet it did,no matter how...
Anyways, a quick thought on the thread, because I'm not that much interested in this:
Argument 1 "Time Travel"
The point might even be valid, if there weren't things such as Beerus splitting the timeline by EE'ing Zamasu (the counterargument is usually that it was an indirect cause of Trunks'...
Even if it was, the current justification wouldn't match. And it'd need to be changed, which as you pointed out here and elsewhere,is not the purpose of the thread. Unless you wanna do it at once.
Ok, sure? We treat it that way, since it affects multiple realms, and by extension space-time. Matter destruction can't cross spatially separated realms. It doesn't have the power to affect the fabric of reality by standards.
You know what's funny? If we do take these seriously, but assume that galaxy is a just an artistic representation of the other countless galaxies and celestial bodies as someone else said, this literally shows the 12 universes being space-time bubbles that are clearly separated from each other...
It's not an Hakai type of thing,maybe, but it should at least qualify as "standard" Existence Erasure.
Disintegration/dissolution is a common effect within fictional works to represent EE.
That's my opinion on this.
(I'm also a casual Bleach enjoyer,lol)
This is a myth that needs to go.
Appeal to authority works everywhere. Staff may state one thing, that doesn't mean it's the ultimate truth.
If an apple is red, it's gonna be red even if any of the staff members or any of the wiki pages say it's blue.
Objectiveness > Subjectiveness.
Third, most of these depictions show things like 3-C sized universes, the lack of an afterlife, Kai realm etc. which are clearly not consistent with 99% of in-verse information. Fourth,some of them aren't even meant to be taken literally and are just for explanation purposes.
That's an appeal to authority,first. not everything staff says is true. One of them was also a calc member/content mod or whatever, which has as much value as a blue member, voting wise.
It sounds good. and yeah, it does seem to be a UI like situation, where gameplay wise, the ability is limited due to game mechanics and balancing shenanigans.
I'll be waiting to see a whole thread "debunked" because of Bulma (same person who does things that no human being should be capable of, but oh well) .
It's pretty straightforward,Luffy. At least, this is how I understood it :
A person's name in Bleach pretty much defines a person's existence: qualities such as strength, and etc. Erase or change such a name and it'll fundamentality alter the subject in question.
It's an abstraction that...
I'll leave the decision to staff. But I find that saying I'm doing this for the sake of a ban is very offensive towards myself.
I literally had a discussion with a staff member recently, where I was asked to not make assumptions out of nowhere.
Show some professionalism, at least. Thanks.