• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Search results for query: *

  1. VeryGoofyToddler

    Divine Creator(Marvel Comics) Profile

    No, I'm waiting for Ultima to do the revision on the tiering system. I already proposed to him my ratings and suggestions and he gave me the thumbs up to do so.
  2. VeryGoofyToddler

    The commoners thread: Discussing Ultima's "On the Many, Many Incoherences of the Tiering System"

    Yes, it is quantitative but not qualitative the amount of verses being downgraded is still less than ∞
  3. VeryGoofyToddler

    The commoners thread: Discussing Ultima's "On the Many, Many Incoherences of the Tiering System"

    Ultima is taking his dear time. Probably one about a month or two.
  4. VeryGoofyToddler

    The commoners thread: Discussing Ultima's "On the Many, Many Incoherences of the Tiering System"

    It was just a joke. I didn't actually think its boring.
  5. VeryGoofyToddler

    The commoners thread: Discussing Ultima's "On the Many, Many Incoherences of the Tiering System"

    If we're going to dwell on semantics then the lets stop here. Obviously, I would win, so I'll declare myself the winner in that regard. Tuff luck Agnaa.
  6. VeryGoofyToddler

    The commoners thread: Discussing Ultima's "On the Many, Many Incoherences of the Tiering System"

    Well if it's not used right ie contradictions then it's just not useable. So my point stands.
  7. VeryGoofyToddler

    The commoners thread: Discussing Ultima's "On the Many, Many Incoherences of the Tiering System"

    I'm not against the Atzmus being 0 and I asked Ultima and he said maybe after a reread.
  8. VeryGoofyToddler

    The commoners thread: Discussing Ultima's "On the Many, Many Incoherences of the Tiering System"

    I was not giving context behind that because I thought you were downplaying the Roots. I was just providing information on the relationship between God: the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit(Ghost) because the relationship between this example and the Roots aren't the same nor analogous. The...
  9. VeryGoofyToddler

    The commoners thread: Discussing Ultima's "On the Many, Many Incoherences of the Tiering System"

    It follows Divine Simplicity, all of God’s parts are the same as his nature. It follows the Catholic doctrine that Jesus is one and the same with God.
  10. VeryGoofyToddler

    The commoners thread: Discussing Ultima's "On the Many, Many Incoherences of the Tiering System"

    I don't really care about High 1-A+ verse soloing other lower-tiered verses. I'm just being very blunt, it's straight-up, not funny, and I'm not being subtle or making myself open for some mocking. I just find it childish.
  11. VeryGoofyToddler

    The commoners thread: Discussing Ultima's "On the Many, Many Incoherences of the Tiering System"

    No. Only a single 0 exist per verse. They won't. They're all equal. They'll just merge in one Unity as a singular being. The only thing separating them is ownership of fiction and that's beyond anyone control inverse. Essentially that's the gist. However, nothing can be beyond 0 or they don't...
  12. VeryGoofyToddler

    The commoners thread: Discussing Ultima's "On the Many, Many Incoherences of the Tiering System"

    He's saying if a verse mentions platonic, wouldn't it need to be proven to be platonic thus granting 1-A? The second part is just saying the many contradictions with how platonic is actually used. This goes with his original point of having to prove that platonic concepts are actually...
  13. VeryGoofyToddler

    The commoners thread: Discussing Ultima's "On the Many, Many Incoherences of the Tiering System"

    There was, but I don't think it's indicative of anything. I believe that's how the hierarchy of the world gets its rating of 1-A for each higher world and 1-A+ for the entire hierarchy. If the lower echelons of Levithan could surpass it then they may get 1-A+ and boost the one to transcend the...
  14. VeryGoofyToddler

    The commoners thread: Discussing Ultima's "On the Many, Many Incoherences of the Tiering System"

    Yeah, I'm not going to lie. I changed my original opinion. I don't see them reaching High 1-A. Most definitely at most 1-A+.
  15. VeryGoofyToddler

    The commoners thread: Discussing Ultima's "On the Many, Many Incoherences of the Tiering System"

    Probably the apex of that hierarchy would be 1-A+ due to the sheer amount of anti-feat for the Levithans. So the hierarchy probably won't reach High 1-A, the smallest hint of High 1-A would maybe be the Mother, but I doubt it.
  16. VeryGoofyToddler

    The commoners thread: Discussing Ultima's "On the Many, Many Incoherences of the Tiering System"

    Ultima said that the Cetacean hierarchy is a good representation of High 1-A and remains that way. I don't know how much more the Mother Levitahn scale but based on what I've read, it could reach High 1-A+
  17. VeryGoofyToddler

    The commoners thread: Discussing Ultima's "On the Many, Many Incoherences of the Tiering System"

    Hey! It happens to the best of us. Some more than others cough cough Aagna
  18. VeryGoofyToddler

    The commoners thread: Discussing Ultima's "On the Many, Many Incoherences of the Tiering System"

    I'm very smart FYI. I wanted to clear that up and I just so happened to read it wrong. So I am very much intellectually capable of answering the question “the right way”. wink wink hint hint
  19. VeryGoofyToddler

    The commoners thread: Discussing Ultima's "On the Many, Many Incoherences of the Tiering System"

    It was mainly a joke. So no offense taken. I answered it so quickly, that I forgot to link the response from the thread to which Ultima explained it. Though, given he himself answered it, my response was treated more of a retort than anything else.
  20. VeryGoofyToddler

    The commoners thread: Discussing Ultima's "On the Many, Many Incoherences of the Tiering System"

    Ultima discusses this. There can be multiple High 1-A+.
  21. VeryGoofyToddler

    The commoners thread: Discussing Ultima's "On the Many, Many Incoherences of the Tiering System"

    I, personally, see why Transdual sounds flawed, but I think we should keep it.
  22. VeryGoofyToddler

    The commoners thread: Discussing Ultima's "On the Many, Many Incoherences of the Tiering System"

    This guy decides to pop out of nowhere. Elder Scroll will have both a 0 and a High 1-A+?
  23. VeryGoofyToddler

    The commoners thread: Discussing Ultima's "On the Many, Many Incoherences of the Tiering System"

    If a High 1-A+ exists then in probability a tier 0 would also exist encompassing and being beyond all logical axioms, possible worlds, and possible contingency. A false Monad can be connected to just one set of axioms and one probability as opposed to all sets of logical axioms. So even a true...
  24. VeryGoofyToddler

    The commoners thread: Discussing Ultima's "On the Many, Many Incoherences of the Tiering System"

    It has already been explained how it works. A Monad being 0 has to be proven to be true. Some verse may not even have a true Monad, so there wouldn't be a gap unless there's nothing to suggest the existence of Modal possible worlds or a framework of a 0 twt originated and encompasses some...
  25. VeryGoofyToddler

    The commoners thread: Discussing Ultima's "On the Many, Many Incoherences of the Tiering System"

    He's referring to another scaling site that uses Aperion as the max. However, he's forgetting a Monad can be false and reduced to 1-A.
  26. VeryGoofyToddler

    The commoners thread: Discussing Ultima's "On the Many, Many Incoherences of the Tiering System"

    Vertigo is under work since Ultima and I can't agree on some stuff. For Matteis, 0 for God(Divine Presence and The Magician). High 1-A+ for Pralaya and Maya. Maybe High 1-A for Lords of Order and Chaos. High 1-A for CU. I don't know where Heaven will scale though. For Crisis, since BDE is...
  27. VeryGoofyToddler

    The commoners thread: Discussing Ultima's "On the Many, Many Incoherences of the Tiering System"

    I don't think Ultima is trying to loosen the standard. If he regards Monadhood as false then obviously the same applies to Platonic Concepts. Everything requires context and support from the setting or else, we’ll randomly give verses free leeway into 1-A. I'm pretty sure like R>F, Monadhood...
  28. VeryGoofyToddler

    About the New Tiering System

    It's due to the fact later on in the incoherent thread. Ultima decided against removing Low 1-A and decided to incorporate his idea of High 1-B+ into Low 1-A.
Back
Top