This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
You don't seem to know anything about the new changes to ND and NEP, right now even if you have ND it can interacted by if someone has a higher dimensionality than you, this can be avoided if you are somehow ND to the dimensionality itself which is not the case with Arceus and NEP just nuking...
I do agree with everything here except Type 2 NEP.
What does the dao of destruction have to do with Ning being non-existent or anything related to physiology? There is no proof that the dao of destruction has any relation to non-existence and your argument that Ning is non-existent to his dao...
And why should I retract? Objectively inciting someone to kill themselves is worse than using slurs/insulting someone and even more so in these times where anyone can be offended by anything, as I said I don't know what garrixian said to him so I have no knowledge.
Huh? What does my position...
Yes.
Let it be clear that I never dismissed one for the other, I refer to the evidence presented and that is why I told him that if he wanted to report Garri then he may do so in HR and I even gave him the instructions, unfortunately I will not be able to see the evidence as that is a matter of...
I would say they count, but tbh screenshots of the messages would work better. Since a group of people can agree to give a testimony that is not the true one for the sake of screwing someone else. I am not saying that this is the case here but better safe than sorry. Try to get as much evidence...
You would like to present evidence for your claims, though since you are reporting a staff then you must send the report to HR instead of debating here.
I'm not actually in home so I have very little time available to review the case, would do so when I'm in home.
I already told you guys to stop clogging up the RVT with unnecessary comments. From what I could review there's nothing to report here. And if there's more than what I'm seeing like the message someone posting about other community being involved then that should be discussed privately. Last...
Okay, I've deleted all the rampage that was here in RVT, I think we all know that this is not a place for random discussions and spam, I say this as advice
@WilliamXJoe The reason why a ban was first requested for you as an option was because they thought you had made a sock which in itself is...