• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

About the Screwattack articles.

ArbitraryNumbers

VS Battles
Retired
4,652
1,328
I'm a bit tired of seeing so many profiles that tackle characters from matchups that weren't even all that controversial, and not even make much of an attempt to be funny, just "Garbage tier, Garbage speed, Garbage durability" or "True infinity+++ tier, True infinity+++ dura" etc. etc.

In my opinion, it's only funny if Screwattack did something particularly wrong with their research that made the matchup controversial. Otherwise it just makes your mockery of Screwattack look a bit forced, and sometimes even downright salty. Same thing if you focus more on countering SA's arguments instead of actually making jokes.

I just thought I'd post some of my thoughts. The "Hey you know what's funny? Screwattack." is getting kind of old to me.

That being said, there are some of them that I actually thought were funny, like this one.
 
Back
Top