- 15,688
- 10,708
- Thread starter
- #81
that's why organization matters most. This is the reason why DBZ and Naruto and other verses like that have 10-20 page CRTs, everyone just spams responses and nobody has time to read them. What you see here is the culmination of what i've said above basicallyReading through most of your concerns at the moment, I will have they say they are more reasonable than before.
yea, but the mountain was only like a km wide tbh. Additionally not knowing the power of the dogs IS the flaw. Additionally if it's not from one dog but from many then that'd present more issues as 1, they wouldn't scale directly to the values and 2, fusion attacks are very uh persecuted on the wiki last time i checked, it's how we had beerus at low 2-C for so long after all.I mean, he did that by casually growling, that is indeed correct. But then again the moral occurs to be that he was also affecting the mountain like you said and not just a single section of a whole rainforest. And we may not actually know how much power the other dogs taking place into shaking large sections of the moon itself.
glad to hear that but you are the one who said that AP =/= DC and that is the point i am pushingTrue, but even then they'll still scale to Krypto regardless of him being one capable with such DC feats since they can all consistently harm him. But I do see your point either way
that's why i am finding fault in it, they were holding back, why would they suddenly cause a massive moon-spanning earthquake, feels susThe possibility could be that if you were to take into account of how long Mammoth Mutt would still have been bouncing around the moon or they may have been just holding back as they're just being casual either way as their mission appears to be simple to them at least.
mountains cause if you cause an earthquake in the mountains you could get a landslide on your head in which case the warning to not shake the moon would make sense.Why would there be some random mountains somehow be existent on a moon either way? I don't understand what's really the point of this segment.
yes but that's the issue, he responded to her actions specifically and Krypto was in the air, which means that he was definitely not the one who that would be directed towardsBull Dog was referring that to everyone on that moon not just her alone though.
i understand but at the same time i find that there is fault in that since not every possibility is accounted for in a 'possibly'. I know you hate the example but bear with me for a second here. If someone is stated to destroy the world, we wouldn't go on to give them "At least 8-B, possibly 7-B, possibly Low 6-B, possibly High 6-B, possibly High 6-A, possibly 5-B, possibly 3-A..." for every possibility there is that could lead to the destruction of the world and same goes here in my opinion, it feels like it came out of nowhere and leads nowhere and we shouldn't just account for any possibility there is. That is my opinion.True, but then again, not every statement has to have a feat happening in the background in order to be at least blatant.
I am glad we managed to figure things out, but if you agree to 7-C then let's go with that. I think it will be more consistent and if you discover tier 7 feats along the way you could add them up, maybe you'll find an unexpected upgrade.Fair enough.
And again, if nobody else has shown any real struggle performing their feats at all, I don't really see the issue in those. But I guess it's just "At least 7-C" to go then. Even then I did try my best to make these to make sense as possible.