• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Imscared: 1-A upgrade, but also Concept removal

Status
Not open for further replies.
CM removal is oke, i will touching 1-A later when i have time (hope)
 
CM removal is oke, i will touching 1-A later when i have time (hope)
alastor-chair.gif
 
It's at least Low 2-C. If the game "simulates" a universe and the player is above it, they're at least of that level. Them being Low 1-C requires effecting a universal 5D space, which only works if they can warp the real world as well.
Eh, I read that we lowkey give Low 1-C for "fake R>F" anyway (1, 2), and you do not really need to truly affect a Low 1-C space, given that 1% of Low 1-C is still Low 1-C given we deal with higher infinities here anyways.
I'm unfortunately inclined to agree with Qawsed, our R>F standards are more complex than the surface idea suggests.
Anyway, what are the thoughts on CM removal from both of you?
 
Anyway, i can't see 1-A from what the OP show. However false R > F is +1D indeed, so I can get behind with the Low 1-C
 
Anyway, i can't see 1-A from what the OP show. However false R > F is +1D indeed, so I can get behind with the Low 1-C
Alright, I guess keeping Low 1-C is fine then.

I'm also fine with the CM -> IM change
 
Alright, I guess keeping Low 1-C is fine then.

I'm also fine with the CM -> IM change
Given 2 staffs agreed, I'll apply when I can the thread.

I also think the blog is technically uneccessary too so I'll try to remake the pages so that information that's only found in the blog is implemented there (only 3 profiles for the verse so).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top