No Limit Fallacy about EE

[Thanganimator]

If a character can erase the existence of an eye or body part on an opponent and there is no context to suggest that they have an erase limit, is it a No Limit Fallacy that they can completely erase the body?
Example:

3s

 

[FriendOfTheTeaParty]

would be pretty weird in this case to limit to their eyes since they're the "animator" and should be intended to be able to just erase anything on the screen albeit taking a tiny bit of time to do so

 

[Thanganimator]

would be pretty weird in this case to limit to their eyes since they're the "animator" and should be intended to be able to just erase anything on the screen albeit taking a tiny bit of time to do so

But didn't No Limit Fallacy say that only count what they show?

 

[Monkey_Dunno]

As far as I'm aware and given the context of this scene, is fair to assume that it could be a full body EE.

That said, this isn't going to apply to any actual VS Battle match in the wiki because it would not be in-character behavior.

 

[SuperNova55555]

But didn't No Limit Fallacy say that only count what they show?

It’s moreso to say that a character having “limitless power” shouldn’t be equated to something like Boundless. There is no issue with assuming this EE is full-body unless the narrative heavily implies this limit.