Fwyzzverse
Username Only- 202
- 71
Revisions Tier 2
In the vsbw arrived at the section of Tier 2: Multiversal, we have several multiversal thirds out in this same tier have the power scale such:
Low 2-C = Exploit significantly on a zone of spaces representing universal sizes of space-time continuums.
Low 1-C = Exploit on spaces whose size corresponds to one or two higher levels of infinity above a standard universal model (Low 2-C structures) on the "dimensional" scale, this can be assimilated to 5- and 6-dimensional real coordinate spaces (R ^ 5 to R ^ 6).
1-C = 7- and 9-dimensional real coordinate spaces (R ^ 7 to R ^ 9).
High 1-C = 10- and 11-dimensional real coordinate spaces (R ^ 10 to R ^ 11).
These are universal feats in a Multiversal tier, but the vsbw tells us that to qualify a world as a multiverse:
If there is shown to be a collection of multiple alternate worlds/dimensions that are either stated to be parallel and/or there are visual depictions resembling each of those worlds/dimensions to be metaphorically similar to each other (Such as bubbles or other structures that appear similar in size), and most importantly, at least one of those individual worlds/dimensions has shown enough evidence to consider them a Universe level+ sized spacetime continuum, then the conclusion is to consider all of those individual worlds/dimensions universes and that the entire collection is a multiverse.
So now we know that a collection of Low 2-C universes is the measure for arriving at a Multiverse, except that the previous thirds are contradictory, since they are not made up of a collection of Low 2-C structures, and that in addition to this, compared to the other Tier 2 power scales that issue exploits on a Multiversal scale, they do not do so on a universal scale.
We have the example:
X which significantly affects, creates/destroys a universal structure on the dimensional plane of 10- and 11-dimensional real coordinate spaces (R ^ 10 to R ^ 11)
A which significantly affects, creates/destroys an infinite number of separate space-time continuums.
The difference is that B performs the feat on a Multiversal scale on an infinite number of Low 2-C structures, in coordination with Tier 2, whereas A performs the feat on a universal scale on a Low 2-C structure, without actually holding a collection of Low 2-C worlds, i.e. a Multiverse.
It would be preferable to take option 2 as "Low Complex universal", for example, so that characters who universally affect, create and/or destroy spaces whose size corresponds to one or two levels of infinity higher than a universal model (Low 2-C structures) with any dimensional level are not downgraded because of the first option, for example.It would be more logical to change the Complex power scales to Low 1-C, 1-C, High 1-C - there are two options:
Low 1-C = Exploit on spaces whose size corresponds to one or two higher levels of infinity above a standard multiversal model (A collection of Low 2-C structures) on the "dimensional" scale, this can be assimilated to 5- and 6-dimensional real coordinate spaces (R ^ 5 to R ^ 6).
1-C = (A collection of Low 2-C structures) 7- and 9-dimensional real coordinate spaces (R ^ 7 to R ^ 9).
High 1-C = (A collection of Low 2-C structures) 10- and 11-dimensional real coordinate spaces (R ^ 10 to R ^ 11).
Hyperverse level = Characters or objects that can Multiversally affect, create and/or destroy spaces whose size corresponds to 8 to any higher finite number of infinity levels above a standard multiversal model. In terms of "dimensional" size, this can be likened to real coordinate spaces of dimension 12 and above (R ^ 12 and above).
High Hyperverse level = Characters or objects that can Multiversally affect, create and/or destroy structures whose size is equivalent to an infinite number of countable qualitative sizes above a multiversal model, usually represented in fiction by infinite hierarchies of layers of existence, each succeeding the previous one completely trivializing it into insignificance, or more generally a space of infinite countable dimensions.
Now, if it were on a multiversal scale, it would no longer contradict the tier, but there is another option. If we leave the universal scale, it would be preferable to change their place from Tier 2 to Tier 3, as well as Low 2-C, and thus proceed with a change of type:
Low Complex universal = Characters or objects that can universally affect, create and/or destroy spaces whose size corresponds to one or two higher levels of infinity than a universal model (Low 2-C structures). In terms of "dimensional" scale, this can be likened to real 5- and 6-dimensional coordinate spaces (R ^ 5 to R ^ 6).
Universal complex level = Characters or objects that can universally affect, create and/or destroy spaces whose size corresponds to one or two higher levels of infinity than a universal model (Low 2-C structures). In terms of "dimensional" scale, this can be likened to real 7- and 9-dimensional real coordinate spaces (R ^ 7 to R ^ 9).
High Universe Complex = Characters or objects that can universally affect, create and/or destroy spaces whose size corresponds to one or two higher levels of infinity than a universal model (Low 2-C structures). In terms of "dimensional" scale, this can be likened to real 10- and 11-dimensional real coordinate spaces (R ^ 10 to R ^ 11).
In particular, I would apply it to the Hyperverselle level (multiversal disease), which has the same reasoning auntant more than the level 2-C, 2-B, 2-A supports well on the fact that it must be at the Multiversal scale then why not the rest of Tier 2 and why the universal scale? so I think an update would be legitimate (if I'm not stupid).
Here's my reasoning, and I'll leave you with my proposal.
Last edited: