Type 5 Acausality Rewording

[Antvasima]

Shouldn't a new thread be planned to make sure that profiles with Acausality Type 5 actually qualify for this new definition?

That seems like a good idea, yes.

Here are all of the pages that need to be checked through:

Pages that link to "Acausality" | VS Battles Wiki | Fandom

vsbattles.fandom.com

Like they said, a new thread clear of the clutter of this thread should be made to judge each of the current owners of Acausality Type 5 if they are justified. It's probably best if a admin creates such a thread and alert staff.

I don't believe Acausality Type 5 was given to that many profiles, so it should simply be an issue of gathering people knowledgeable of the profiles in question and of staff willing to do any required edits.

Okay. Is somebody here willing to create such a thread please? I think that it would probably be placed in our staff forum.

I can probably send a notification to request help afterwards.

So about this...

 

[HammerStrikes219]

So about this...

I will do so I think. After all, I was only disagreeing with specific points made by Agnaa and @Jinsye with some logic involved.

 

[Antvasima]

Okay, but are you certain that you will be able to handle it properly?

 

[Everything12]

I will get to creating the thread myself now.

 

[Antvasima]

Thank you. That would be appreciated.

 

[Everything12]

https://vsbattles.com/threads/reviewing-acausality-type-5-on-profiles.140529/

Here is the thread, this thread can be closed and staff can be @ to that thread.

 

[Antvasima]

Okay. I will close this thread. Thank you to everybody who helped out here.