- 429
- 395
So it's been a while, but as some of you may know, after the previous thread concluded, @Agnaa raised concerns about the decision to delete the pages here. Following a brief discussion in a group chat, we agreed that the better approach would be to lock the verse and apply a template similar to the (now former) {{Outdated}}, prompting the creation of this thread.
Now that the thread has concluded, I'm proposing to restore all the previously deleted pages, apply the {{Outdated}} template to each, and edit-lock them.
While we're at it, it would also be a good opportunity to rename the pages immediately after they're restored. As mentioned in the Discord server, the plan is as follows:
I also assume our prior naming convention was based off of the TYPE-MOON wiki, which itself moved away from the format over 4 and a half years ago (presumably for similar reasons), as we can see here:
There were some other odd choices for the page names (I recall Shiki's page having her last name first, as 'Ryougi Shiki', while both of her Servant Counterparts' pages were 'Assassin/Saber (Shiki Ryougi)'), but the bulk of the work here would be for the rest of the Servants.
This should be relatively uncontroversial and is close enough to the undeletion process for it to be done in one fell swoop, so it makes sense to handle both now.
Now that the thread has concluded, I'm proposing to restore all the previously deleted pages, apply the {{Outdated}} template to each, and edit-lock them.
While we're at it, it would also be a good opportunity to rename the pages immediately after they're restored. As mentioned in the Discord server, the plan is as follows:
The main reason for this is that the TYPE-MOON fandom has largely stopped using Class names to refer to specific Servants like they did back in, say, 2016, which is a given considering we now have upwards of 700 Servants compared to the couple dozen of the pre-/early-FGO era.Note: Servant profiles will be moved from "Class name (True name)" or "Class name (Series name)" to "True name (Class name)" or "True name (Fate)"
As a rule of thumb, if the Type-Moon wiki has "True name (Class name)", use the same article name. If they just have "True name", do "True name (Fate)" or "True name (Series name)"
if their names are already unique enough to be distinguished from other verses (e.g. the titles of the Hassans), just use those
Examples:
"Saber (Fate/stay night)" -> "Artoria Pendragon (Saber)"
"Playable Saber (Fate/EXTRA)" -> "Nero Claudius (Fate)"
"Saber of Black (Siegfried)" -> "Siegfried (Fate)"
"Saber (Fate/Prototype)" -> "Arthur Pendragon (Fate/Prototype)"
"Assassin (Hassan of the Cursed Arm)" -> "Hassan of the Cursed Arm"
I also assume our prior naming convention was based off of the TYPE-MOON wiki, which itself moved away from the format over 4 and a half years ago (presumably for similar reasons), as we can see here:
There were some other odd choices for the page names (I recall Shiki's page having her last name first, as 'Ryougi Shiki', while both of her Servant Counterparts' pages were 'Assassin/Saber (Shiki Ryougi)'), but the bulk of the work here would be for the rest of the Servants.
This should be relatively uncontroversial and is close enough to the undeletion process for it to be done in one fell swoop, so it makes sense to handle both now.
Last edited: