• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Messages
5,386
Reaction score
4,827
Introduction:
The current state of LIfting Strength of Tokyo Ghoul is trash. Vast majority of characters either scale to Class 5 without justification or are straight up unknown. Thankfully, with the acceptance of new Lifting Strength feats we can upgrade the verse. This is only for the original Tokyo Ghoul. RE will get its own thread

Kaneki:
  • Ken Kaneki - Kaneki did this feat. Therefore he should go from Class 5, Class G with Kagune to Class M, Class G with Kagune for his Tokyo Ghoul Key

Aogiri Ghouls:
Ainteku Ghouls:
Investigators:
Agree: @Dalesean027, @FinePoint
 
Last edited:
Agree with scaling investigators.

Disagree with mass scaling everyone to Class G.
Yamori definitely does not scale to that. Instead of Class M, Class G with kagune, you should just make Class M for low tier
 
Agree with scaling investigators.

Disagree with mass scaling everyone to Class G.
Yamori definitely does not scale to that. Instead of Class M, Class G with kagune, you should just make Class M for low tier
Eto is already Class G with her Kagune. Given that Noro and Tatara are around the same level, I think it should be fine for them to get Class G. Yamori should get Class G given his extended fight with Kaneki.

However I do think Ayato, Renji, and Uta should just get Class M.
 
Eto is already Class G with her Kagune. Given that Noro and Tatara are around the same level, I think it should be fine for them to get Class G. Yamori should get Class G given his extended fight with Kaneki.
Kaneki at the time of that battle does not scale to Eto.

Yamori is an average S-rank. Weakened is still SSS-rank. There is a whole gulf between them
However I do think Ayato, Renji, and Uta should just get Class M.
Agree
 
Ah.

So I think Class M for everyone save Eto, Noro, and Tatara - he should at least be relative to Eto
Not really. They are much weaker than Yoshimura and Eto. They just scale by AP and Durability, although they are probably weaker.

Just because they scale to AP doesn't mean they scale to LS. We need direct evidence that they can fight it.
 
I can't speak on any scaling chains but as far as just applying accepted calculations to the already existing chains that I agree with
 
Ignoring the scaling chain portion can you speak on the core premise of this thread which is just applying an updated calc to the scalin chain.

I'm not a supporter either so I just approved only that part
I don't see an obvious problem with the feat itself.

As for the scaling, I can at least say the reasons don't seem illogical, though of course only the supporters could decide if it's presented honestly and in complete context.
 
I don't see an obvious problem with the feat itself.

As for the scaling, I can at least say the reasons don't seem illogical, though of course only the supporters could decide if it's presented honestly and in complete context.
Yup that's really all we can do here so otherwise thanks for commenting
 
Any chance we can get other supporters on board and get their thoughts?
I pinged the two staff supporters from before so I can't really control if they have interest in commenting

At worst you can apply the CRT to the current scaling chain since we ultimately can't have final say in the proposed one since we aren't supporters
 
Any chance we can get other supporters on board and get their thoughts?
If you know anyone in particular, let us know.

There's no actual policy for non-staff input, but personally I don't feel comfortable approving a scaling chain unless a majority of supporters (who comment) agree with it.
 
Back
Top