So for you, a person who refutes without any empirical evidence means nothing at all, does it make any sense?
Burden isn't on me, it's on the people making the dozen unfounded claims, it's on the OP who wants the suggestion to be passed, that's how CRT's work. You have to prove it, especially for tier 1 anything.
Until proven otherwise, there is nothing empirical in Chariot's claims;
Not how this works. Every single facet needs to be proven by OP, it hasn't. Simply asserting something as true means quite literally nothing, only the source material does.
OP can say whatever they want, you can say whatever YOU want, but unless the anime itself says those things, tough luck, we're not here to index extrapolation or conjecture.
he only asks for evidence while the assertion is made on his side.
Yeah funny that though, I'm not asserting a thing, and precisely because of that I want evidence, because damn right we want evidence, we can only work with what's actually shown and stated, if it isn't shown or stated, we don't fill in HUGE blanks with interpretations that can be filled in with equally valid ones that don't lead to the proclaimed verdict.
But all the same, i could, in fact, assert a bunch of things, and it would be completely, equally, valid, because it'd have just as much backing as the claims being made here (Ie, that is to say, simply conjecture and extrapolation without concrete proof).
In fact I very well might begin doing so to show how the alleged verdict, isn't even remotely as concrete as one would be led to believe.
Logically, the burden of proof has been on him for a while. Otherwise, there is no concrete refutation apart from some criticism that is not solidly constructed.
Unfortunate as it might be, it better be solidly constructed. That in and of itself is grounds to reject it.
And you say refutation. The refutation is there's no proof, it's simply "i think it is so it is", or asserting a stance on a facet that is very much open ended. We don't do that here, it either is, or it isn't, there's no real inbetween.
With all due respect, I feel like you are a person who follows blindly.
Lad you can't say "with all due respect", and then follow it up accusations.
As long as Dragon Ball is refuted, you follow the delusion.
Accuse people and get sent to RVR btw.
But hey if you want to chime in, why don't you give proof? Show me a statement saying it was done through raw power, show me IZ using his size to attack offensively so the size=AP argument can even be a thing, show me statements saying it was done through raw power alone (the fusing I mean), show me it altered the hypertimeline in a way beyond fusing (as to qualify for the "effected thing in meaningful way" caveat), show me the breaching of timelines was done via power not hax despite what the anime actively leads you to believe by bringing up hax methods, show me that his extreme circumstances played no part in it let alone his abilities, show me the mythical wiki rule where we auto give stats for things like this, show me direct evidence that energy in this context which by admission of everyone here isn't even just raw ki is actually just raw ki, show me statements saying his power output grew in conjunction with his fusing, show me rule where we give AP for smurf hax or existence, while you're at it, show me a statement saying he fused with the hyper timeline at all because going through the episode, I'm pretty sure we have a direct statement that he
didn't fuse with the hypertimeline and simply the worlds embedded in it.