Because Sid no longer had Abigail's powers.
As I told Tanin, it may just be a question of a limitation of regeneration, it is not necessarily regeneration negation.
No, because Dante's goal was not to dismember or completely cut off his brother.
Fodder demons, which are your average joe in each game, are stated to have low high regen and they are the lowest possible demons
Where?
I made a mistake, i meant low godly regen, as to where its found out, check the demon physiology page at low tier demons section
I don't see how that's regen tbh.
Because there is no regeneration described or mentioned.
Dante literally says he would kill Vergil if its necessary, the scene itself blantantly show Rebellion slice through Vergil torso, he would stop Vergil no matter what it cost because when it comes someone put human realm at danger, Dante ain't messing around.
Dante literally tried to save him from his fall. If Dante had been completely in bloodlust, he would have completely cut Vergil in two (like Sephiroth did to Vergil in their Death Battle) or even outright decapitated him.
And he did cut Vergil in two. And Vergil had no visible injury.
They are never seen with visible injuries in the cutscenes, even when it is explicitly stated that they are injured.
Yeah that's what regen does?
If the regeneration works properly, you're not injured.
You mean like how we can visually see with our own eyes in the cutscenes of the final fight that their regen is working just fine and they do not dismember or even cut off their fingers?
Their regeneration doesn't work well because they are injured.
Not really, they are explicitly stated to be weaker, not incapable of regenning altogether anywhere. Infact they are depicted to be debuffed so much that Arkham soloed them. But did they at all stop regenning in the entire fight. The answer is obviously no as we can visually see that. By their perspective the opponent can be injured and even beaten or killed cos they are equals.
Not really, by your theory high tier demons lack regen for basic stuff like eyes all together. But then again demons gain power from taking and dishing damage and also somehow become weaker paradoxically?
They are weaker because they are injured, as explicitly stated by Arkham (Arkham makes it clear to Vergil that he has the upper hand because of the beating he took, obviously referring to the sword blow Vergil received from Dante, because it was at that moment that he began to weaken) and Vergil (Vergil clearly told Dante to heal his injuries before facing him).
In the case of Vergil and Dante, this only applies in their demonic forms, and as far as demons are concerned in general, it can simply means that their empowerment can be overwhelmed and/or blitz by a vastly superior.
Me whenever I see random casuals show up on this site to yap on something as if they know better
Just so its clear, this comment is in reference to other individuals i had to deal with in such scenarios over the years on the wiki, so its NOT aimed at Hakim regarding this one here
Injured by each other's attacks yes. But did their regen slowed in the cutscenes or is it implied that they are unable to regen because of taking the beating, obviously no.
This is explicitly not the case, tho.
Yeah and that is exactly what a layer is. Superior being with greater layers of regen neg bypasses it, duh.
Against stronger or weaker demons, superiority of layers win.
So you think they're injured from the hits they took, but their regeneration is still working perfectly? The whole point of regeneration is to heal injuries. Dante and Vergil were injured because their regeneration wasn't working properly.
Or it could simply be that the devil powers they regain are just not huge enough to compete with the opponents they face, or that they get one-shotted before having any significant amp. You don't need to have a regeneration negation (assuming that all demons actually have regeneration).
This does not prove that there is regeneration negation either.
I know, but not in this case, not when there is a much more logical alternative and literally nothing I've seen so far can prove 100% the regen neg
The problem is that the "logical alternative" doesn't make sense once you sit down and look at the verse
Also, it's interesting because it can proves empowerment negation for Dante and Vergil, not regeneration negation.
You just keep saying I'm talking nonsense without providing any actual arguments lolBro just saying shit atp
I mean everyone else has done a good job responding to your arguements to be brutally honest, I don't see the need. You've already been told to either make a CRT or compile all your grievances into one post, so its like.... yeah. Seems everything is being handled.
I don't take their blog as gospel truth, I just agree with them and Death Battle on the regeneration/stamina thing.
Because there is no evidence of that, and especially no evidence that demons in general have the same specific regeneration.
Proof that Dante was comparable to Sparda in anime? He needed Sparda sword to beat Mundus, let alone Sparda DT
There is no reason to give demons the abilities of Sparda's bloodline.
Yes, but we don't even know if they can heal their injuries once they return from their Devil Arms.
