DImension of Strange Swirling Lights is Low-1 C and Timeline is 1-C

[Mgebrat282]

In my Blog I looked at DoSSL dimensionality, so if it'd be accepted logically 1 timeline is 6 dimensional. As it was accepted that it has 2 temporal dimensions, adding 4 spatial dimensions(DoSSL has extradimensional space) would make it 6-D, because each timeline has its own DoSSL(in DBS: Broly this dimension was destroyed, and in another timeline it appears again, but then it was destroyed too).

 

[Hellformer]

Hell nah, not again☠

 

[Bossbrosish]

Are you trying to use the Xenoverse games as proof the swirling light dimension was a different timeline or something?

 

[Mgebrat282]

Are you trying to use the Xenoverse games as proof the swirling light dimension was a different timeline or something?

No, just that DoSSL is a part of timeline

 

[Mgebrat282]

Hell nah, not again☠

Well, Blog I use has pretty much information, so you might wanna look at it.

 

[Dagoth_OwO]

Considering how this is the 3rd major DB-related CRT from new users, I'm 99% convinced that VBW is just getting raided prob by reddit

 

[Killerdrone123]

We’re aware of what’s going on,Actions have a way of catching up

 

[JustANormalPerson01]

A CRT with basically the same arguments you have was closed hours ago. Per discussion rules, rejected topics cannot be submited in 3-4 months unless new information is brought up, which is not the case here.

Also:

"Different space": "異空間 (yì kōng jiān)", which the definition in the Japanese dictionary is how it's a space independent of the "normal world" with no law, with a different time flow, the dictionary also notes how “It can be simply understood that the plane formed by the X-axis and the Y-axis is a two-dimensional space, the X/Y/Z-axis constitutes a three-dimensional space, which is often referred to as 3D, and that the X/Y/Z plus the time axis is the space we exist in, and spaces larger than X+Y+Z+Time.”

Uh... am I wrong or they aren't the same kanji?

異空間 vs 异空间

Not to mention Google's automatic translator marks your website as chinese, not japanese.

 

[Ottavio_Merluzzo]

異空間 vs 异空间

Not to mention Google's automatic translator marks your website as chinese, not japanese.

The first one is either traditional Chinese or Japanese, while the second one is simplified Chinese.

 

[AlexSamDen]

Yeah, as was said above, since a CRT on this topic was rejected just yesterday, you cannot start a new one without a permission from staff for at least 3 months per the Discussion Rule

When creating content revisions, it is essential to ensure that the topic has not been addressed previously. Rejected content revisions cannot be resubmitted within a short period of time (typically defined as within 3 to 4 months), except in cases where a staff member has a good reason to do so (e.g. important unconsidered information, violation of site standards, or flaws in a calculation).

 

[Vietthai96]

Seriously, your blog mixed Japanese with Chinese

超 (chāo)

This is how the Kanji is worded in Chinese, in Japanese it is worded as Chō

異空間 (yì kōng jiān)

This is another Chinese worded part

Ngl, i feel like this should be closed, anyway will be busy for a while

 

[Mgebrat282]

A CRT with basically the same arguments you have was closed hours ago. Per discussion rules, rejected topics cannot be submited in 3-4 months unless new information is brought up, which is not the case here.

Also:

Uh... am I wrong or they aren't the same kanji?

異空間 vs 异空间

Not to mention Google's automatic translator marks your website as chinese, not japanese.

I didn't know that it was already posted, what an accident.
Well, okay, my mistake in this.

 

[Mgebrat282]

Seriously, your blog mixed Japanese with Chinese

This is how the Kanji is worded in Chinese, in Japanese it is worded as Chō


This is another Chinese worded part

Ngl, i feel like this should be closed, anyway will be busy for a while

Thank you! I redacted it.

 

[Mgebrat282]

Considering how this is the 3rd major DB-related CRT from new users, I'm 99% convinced that VBW is just getting raided prob by reddit

What!?

 

[Cipher72]

So with all of this we can conclude that the Dimensions of Swirling Lights / Super Dimensions are indeed a higher dimension and therefore should qualify to 5-D

I have a feeling I have seen this argument somewhere before anyways this is trying to argue for the timeline and the dimension being 5-D/L1-C compared to the previous thread which was attempting to scale several characters to said L1-C tier so I think that it's a bit different. Anyways one of the main arguments was that

• There isn't enough proof
• The dimension isn't of significant size (Universal and above)

The latter hasn't been addressed in the blog and the former depends on the personal standards.
Idk whether this CRT will be closed or not but you can put me in neutral for the Dimension being L1-C and in disagreement for the Timeline being 1-C because of the same reasons the previous thread was rejected.

 

[Mgebrat282]

I have a feeling I have seen this argument somewhere before anyways this is trying to argue for the timeline and the dimension being 5-D/L1-C compared to the previous thread which was attempting to scale several characters to said L1-C tier so I think that it's a bit different. Anyways one of the main arguments was that

• There isn't enough proof
• The dimension isn't of significant size (Universal and above)

The latter hasn't been addressed in the blog and the former depends on the personal standards.
Idk whether this CRT will be closed or not but you can put me in neutral for the Dimension being L1-C and in disagreement for the Timeline being 1-C because of the same reasons the previous thread was rejected.

Thank you for answer! Well, that CRT is pretty long(3 pages), so...can you shortly describe why it was rejected, please?

 

[Hecky2222]

Considering how this is the 3rd major DB-related CRT from new users, I'm 99% convinced that VBW is just getting raided prob by reddit

I am still waiting for SDBH High 1A CRT ngl

 

[Cipher72]

Thank you for answer! Well, that CRT is pretty long(3 pages), so...can you shortly describe why it was rejected, please?

• Not enough proof for the dimension being 5-D (However many of the members were in agreement with that)
• The dimension isn't of significant size (Isn't bigger than Universal)
• OP didn't present proof of the characters destroying the Dimension itself
• If the characters truly destroyed the dimension itself then they couldn't have returned to an unscathed Earth because that's how higher dimensions work.

I apologise if I misinterpreted or misunderstood some points but these are the main ones from what I gathered either way I recommend going over the arguments in the thread and prioritising Staff's reasoning.

 

[Dagoth_OwO]

What!?

Just saying, this is the third major DB-related CRT in a short time-span by new users. Three times is starting to get a bit sus

 

[Dagoth_OwO]

I am still waiting for SDBH High 1A CRT ngl

Tier 0*

 

[Cipher72]

I am still waiting for SDBH High 1A CRT ngl

1-A+ via Arale loop is better.

 

[XXBenShapiroXx]

This genuinely feels like its intentional atp, someone is trying to poison the well for verse supporters

A string of pretty new accounts posting poorly made controversial crt threads in quick succession feels like someone is trying to bait a discussion rule

 

[Mgebrat282]

• Not enough proof for the dimension being 5-D (However many of the members were in agreement with that)
• The dimension isn't of significant size (Isn't bigger than Universal)
• OP didn't present proof of the characters destroying the Dimension itself
• If the characters truly destroyed the dimension itself then they couldn't have returned to an unscathed Earth because that's how higher dimensions work.

I apologise if I misinterpreted or misunderstood some points but these are the main ones from what I gathered either way I recommend going over the arguments in the thread and prioritising Staff's reasoning.

Well, it was stated to break apart, its boundaries couldn't handle them and just crumble, so I think it's logical to say it was destroyed in DBS movie, isn't it?
I think authors made their point about it being more higher dimensional or alteast having spatial dimension that differs from mortal world, thus making timeline 6-D for having several time dimensions and 4 space dimensions(tell me if I'm wrong here, I admit my mistakes). Isn't being higher dimensional makes dimension already bigger than infinite 3-D universe because of having more dimensions(2-D universe is infinitly smaller than 3-D universe)?
Note: Battle in this dimension was stated as "時空を超えた闘い" "A battle that transcends the space and time"

 

[Mgebrat282]

This genuinely feels like its intentional atp, someone is trying to poison the well for verse supporters

A string of pretty new accounts posting poorly made controversial crt threads in quick succession feels like someone is trying to bait a discussion rule

What's wrong with me!?

 

[TheGreatJedi13]

using the same argument as the last thread

if they were really destroyed how come they just returned to the original universe

btw i urged you to actually read the thread because the OP is persistent and argued almost everything including what you're saying now

instead of asking for a summary

 

[Mgebrat282]

using the same argument as the last thread

if they were really destroyed how come they just returned to the original universe

By creating a dimensional hole in the moment of destruction, like they do

 

[MrTayman616]

What's wrong with me!?

Nothing. It's just that this is the third time a thread about this is released this week by new users, which is very rare and unexpected. So it probably seem weird for some people.

 

[Mgebrat282]

using the same argument as the last thread

if they were really destroyed how come they just returned to the original universe

btw i urged you to actually read the thread because the OP is persistent and argued almost everything including what you're saying now

instead of asking for a summary

But it's very long

 

[TheGreatJedi13]

By creating a dimensional hole in the moment of destruction, like they do

Then they didn't really destroy the universe, and that same argument can be used that when they destroyed the swirling lights, they simply tore another hole back to reality.
especially when both the entrance and exit are achieved in the same manner

You can't just say their power destroyed the 5D dimension while somehow not destroying the main universe with the same clash of power

And once again
This has already said in the thread.

But it's very long

You're gonna read it anyway, regurgitated as a reply here when we posted the same argument from there in response to your argument that the old thread already argued for

 

[XXBenShapiroXx]

What's wrong with me!?

You've had an account for a day and are already trying to upgrade the most controversial site on the wiki without consulting the supporters or even giving them a heads up.

 

[Saqphire]

Thank you for answer! Well, that CRT is pretty long(3 pages), so...can you shortly describe why it was rejected, please?

Died to semantics

 

[Mgebrat282]

You've had an account for a day and are already trying to upgrade the most controversial site on the wiki without consulting the supporters or even giving them a heads up.

It just came up to my head and I desided to do that...Didn't know that it must be so complecated

 

[Mgebrat282]

Then they didn't really destroy the universe, and that same argument can be used that when they destroyed the swirling lights, they simply tore another hole back to reality.
especially when both the entrance and exit are achieved in the same manner

You can't just say their power destroyed the 5D dimension while somehow not destroying the main universe with the same clash of power

Why it can't be both? This clash destroyed the dimension(which is stated) and thus impact created another hole in dimensional barrier, that leaded to mortal universe.

 

[Mgebrat282]

Died to semantics

Please, previous thread is too long. Tell me where I'm wrong in my OWN.

 

[ItsMeat]

Considering how this is the 3rd major DB-related CRT from new users, I'm 99% convinced that VBW is just getting raided prob by reddit

It really is

 

[Saqphire]

Please, previous thread is too long. Tell me where I'm wrong in my OWN.

That is the summarisation. The arguments presented are only empty statements on their own that don't necessarily mean what their higher interpretations say which the threads were pushing. A lower interpretation can accuractely reflect the dimension's properties and statements and there was nothing to justify why the higher interpretation was more likely.

 

[Mgebrat282]

That is the summarisation. The arguments presented are only empty statements on their own that don't necessarily mean what their higher interpretations say which the threads were pushing. A lower interpretation can accuractely reflect the dimension's properties and statements and there was nothing to justify why the higher interpretation was more likely.

What are higher and lower interpretation?

 

[Saqphire]

What are higher and lower interpretation?

Higher is 5D higher, lower is it simply being another 4D dimension (due to characters and objects with height, width and length being able to exist in it alongside the progress of events known as time). Neither interpretation take account for the size however

 

[LuffyRuffy46307]

Again? Let's end this discussion once and for all, or someone better make a crt about this subject. I think new users want to undermine our work and create lots of rules in a row.

 

[ItsMeat]

Again? Let's end this discussion once and for all, or someone better make a crt about this subject. I think new users want to undermine our work and create lots of rules in a row.

This and the afterlife should become banned topics tbh