• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

The Mah-vel Unfawking Thread Step Three: I Came Back with Milk

Status
Not open for further replies.
I guess so, though technically Supernova (i.e. real world "exploding suns/stars") already far surpass a star's typical GBE. And it's not like this could be used to upscale star destruction feats, it would only replace typical "supernova" feats if used.
In real life an exploding star is High 4-C, if I remember correctly. 🙏
 
Can we refrain from calling things outliers until we finish collecting feats? That defeats the whole purpose of the thread.
What’s the point of collecting feats of we’re going to call half of them outliers?
Yeah we shouldn't just immediately dismiss something as an outlier based on vibes. This is a feat collecting thread, so we should gather everything we can. Discussion of outliers is for later imo
You guys understand what characters are under revision, correct? This isn't scaling free-for-all. If the High 8-Cs were under discussion I would've mentioned them in the last 6 months. And me mentioning them is important because the staff expectation of the thread and conclusions derived, are working on the idea that I was responsible enough to moderate this debate and properly structure the feats presented for TIERS 5-B. TIER 5-B is being discussed. That is what the project is.

You can't just make the 200 character CRT consider 200 characters more for scaling because you can't be assed to make a CRT of your own, 10 pages and 4 threads down. Please. Think ONCE. I am saying this in the nicest way possible because to be blunt I can't fathom what thought process leads you guys to give proposals like this. This is ******* ridiculous.

It did knock him out but didn't hurt his armor IIRC, so downscaling to baseline 6-B (7 teratons) from the 18 teraton calc would make sense
Seems fine
Captain Marvel's High 6-A feat is still valid.
And you haven't said anything about her 5-B explosion.
Can you link these rq?
 
You can't just make the 200 character CRT consider 200 characters more for scaling because you can't be assed to make a CRT of your own, 10 pages and 4 threads down. Please. Think ONCE. I am saying this in the nicest way possible because to be blunt I can't fathom what thought process leads you guys to give proposals like this. This is ******* ridiculous.
Spider-man is a can of worms when it comes to scaling, but point taken.
 
You guys understand what characters are under revision, correct? This isn't scaling free-for-all. If the High 8-Cs were under discussion I would've mentioned them in the last 6 months. And me mentioning them is important because the staff expectation of the thread and conclusions derived, are working on the idea that I was responsible enough to moderate this debate and properly structure the feats presented for TIERS 5-B. TIER 5-B is being discussed. That is what the project is.

You can't just make the 200 character CRT consider 200 characters more for scaling because you can't be assed to make a CRT of your own, 10 pages and 4 threads down. Please. Think ONCE. I am saying this in the nicest way possible because to be blunt I can't fathom what thought process leads you guys to give proposals like this. This is ******* ridiculous.

Seems fine

Can you link these rq?
A feat from a character below High Tiers is relevant to High Tier scaling, because inherently every character we are talking about would scale above that feat. I don't know why you are so uptight about this.
 
A feat from a character below High Tiers is relevant to High Tier scaling, because inherently every character we are talking about would scale above that feat. I don't know why you are so uptight about this.
I mean, technically if the feat is deemed as not usable for scaling, then the scaling of the high tiers wouldn't reflect upscaling the unused feat.
 
Can you link these rq?
The skarab one which you were fine with on page 1
k, got a few tier 6 feats

Carol is one of those characters that while does have holdback, she isn't that rigid over it, so decent scaling
As for the tier 5 one is this, you completely ignored the 2006 feat.
My previous comment was ignored so I will bring it up again this time I will add scans.
Ms. Marvel in her weakest form OG in 1977 took on an explosion caused by a carvorite crystal an explosion which is stated to be capable of destroying Earth.
The carvorite was brought back again in 2006 in which the brood planned to destroy an alien called Cru by exploding a carvorite cystal which was stated to also take the earth with it, one time stated that it would vaporize a hunk of the planet, half the planet, destroy earth, wipe out the planet and Cru was stated to channel enough energy to wipe out the planet

She exploded the crystal on space she was right at the center of it, she was also almost out of energy and hurt when it happened
 
Let's try not to be to accusatory of one another, we're all stressed and want what's best for Marvel Comics and don't want a 100 page thread.
 
I mean, technically if the feat is deemed as not usable for scaling, then the scaling of the high tiers wouldn't reflect upscaling the unused feat.
I just mean that if accepted, it would be support for Tier 6 Heralds. Its not needed since we have feats above that level, but still
 
A feat from a character below High Tiers is relevant to High Tier scaling, because inherently every character we are talking about would scale above that feat. I don't know why you are so uptight about this.
Obb I am deadass, I am this close to declare this is derailment and there be action done on this thread. We aren't adding 200 characters on this thread, because I know none of you will be revising 400 characters at once.

I have told you why this is a problem since page one of this thread. It is now page ten. Nothing has changed except your insistence. So this is a test of my patience at this point
Firstly, what is the issue number?
The skarab one which you were fine with on page 1
ye sure ill include it
As for the tier 5 one is this, you completely ignored the 2006 feat.
It's for the same reasons as the Vol 1 one, same dynamics at play. I didn't ignore it, just that whatever I said for the feat prior applies here because it's the same source.
 
It's for the same reasons as the Vol 1 one, same dynamics at play. I didn't ignore it, just that whatever I said for the feat prior applies here because it's the same source.
Not it's not, did you even saw it? It's no portal, it's clearly an explosion and we straight up see the guy being vaporized by the explosion while Carol doesn't
 
Oh by the way, my Model 9 Iron Man calc got rejected, something about "energy surpassing the GBE of Earth hitting the Earth and not destroying it" not making sense. I could try using real-world ISL (and ignore the comic's numbers) to get something, but I feel if the energy reaching Earth even approaches it's real world GBE, it'll be rejected again.

We might be running out of feats.
 
Oh by the way, my Model 9 Iron Man calc got rejected, something about "energy surpassing the GBE of Earth hitting the Earth and not destroying it" not making sense. I could try using real-world ISL (and ignore the comic's numbers) to get something, but I feel if the energy reaching Earth even approaches it's real world GBE, it'll be rejected again.

We might be running out of feats.
Could it be recalced based on it collapsing the West Coast into the ocean when it hit Earth?
 
Doctor Doom fought a Tyros powered by a portion of the Power Cosmic equal to the Silver Surfer and only lost due to hax. Herald level Doom
 
I agree with Impress about that we should keep this revision thread focused on what it is intended for. She can continue with improving the reliability of Marvel Comics characters with other tiers in later revision threads. 🙏
 
We should probably use one of them that seems more reliable. 🙏
 
So, where does that leave us? @Rex_Eckles' Iron Man feat looks good but apparently needs a recalc. @Suigetsuhyugs says that there is more to his feat than what @The_Impress addressed. We have an assortment of Tier 7 and lower end Tier 6 feats to use. I think there was also a 6-B and High 6-A feat mentioned, but idk what happened to those. There is also the issue of Human Torch's flames have several Tier 5 or even Tier 4 statements/feats, and I don't know if we came to a conclusion on that. Feats from characters like Blastaar and Super Skrull were deemed unusable due to mechanics unique to them I think.
 
As in, the tier with numerically more feats? If so, that's probably gonna be Tier 7.
Not necessarily the more numerous, otherwise basically everyone would be like 9-B. We just need to make sure that there are a decent number of higher end feats to establish consistency.
 
I'll get it it, the Model 9 isn't scaled to these (relatively) higher tiers but we might be able to get Fin Fang Foom to 40 times whatever the yield will be.
My worry about using that multiplier is that weaker armors do scales to some of these high tiers imo. I want to do a revision on that further down the line. If Iron Man doesn't currently scale on our wiki, but might in the future, how would we handle feats from him?

Also, in general I'm skeptical about multiplier statements being used in Marvel.
 
My worry about using that multiplier is that weaker armors do scales to some of these high tiers imo. I want to do a revision on that further down the line. If Iron Man doesn't currently scale on our wiki, but might in the future, how would we handle feats from him?

Also, in general I'm skeptical about multiplier statements being used in Marvel.
"Varies" up to (40 times normal) with a strong enough power source?
 
That seems fine to me as well. 🙏
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top