• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Ninjago: God Tier “downgrade” (kind of)

Ghengiroo115

She/Her
Messages
2,487
Reaction score
1,969
The Problem
This is gonna be the most semantical thread ever, but this has been bothering me for a while.

Something I noticed in the Ninjago profiles was how many profiles have “at least Low 1-C, likely far higher”. This confused me as there didn’t seem to be anything that warranted such massive upscaling over 5-D. I brought it up here yesterday, and after some discussion I’ve come to the conclusion that some changes are needed. Before I start I want to clarify that I’ve only watched the first 10 seasons of the show (though I’ve rewatched those ones a decent amount of times), so I’ll be mainly basing everything on the profiles as most of it involves stuff in later seasons.

First of all I want to note how the Attack Potency page describes “at least”, “likely” and “higher” ratings (specifically the second half for higher):

At least
Should be used to denote the lower cap of a character, if the exact value is indeterminate.
Likely
Should be used to list a statistic for a character with some basis, but inconclusive due to the justification being vague or non-definitive. The probability of the justification in question for being reliable should be favourable. This term should be used sparingly.
Higher
Furthermore, higher may also be used to denote a case where the character is possibly or likely a higher tier, but to what degree is not specified. This is specifically referring to cases such as “At least 4-B, likely higher” or “At least Solar System level, likely higher”.

So from what I understand, there are two ways to warrant a “likely (far) higher” rating:
  1. Characters who solidly scale to a certain value, but likely scale to a higher value within the same tier. Examples would be a 100 Foe character being likely 1 TeraFoe (both ends are 4-B) or a 6-D character being likely 7-D (both ends are 1-C).
  2. As mentioned on the page; characters who are so beyond a certain tier that they’re potentially a higher tier, but with no evidence to definitively give them any higher tier.
The “at least” part is a bit more vague, but knowing exactly what “likely far higher” can mean will help to decide whether the characters should have that part.

It was explained in the QnA thread I made that the upscaling comes from characters being stronger than weaker Low 1-C characters. Let’s look at the profiles of some of the non-“far higher” Low 1-C characters to see whether that holds true. To make things easier to follow, I’ll mention now that the “at least/likely far higher” characters scale to the multiverse, while each Realm is considered Low 1-C on their own.




Profile
Almost defeated The First Spinjitzu Master and forced him to split Ninjago in two


You might notice that every single character/form mentioned here has scaling to either the Overlord/Crystal King, the First Spinjitzu Master or Lloyd Garmadon’s Golden Oni form, all of who have “at least/likely far higher” ratings. So what exactly are the higher rated characters upscaling so highly from?

There were two characters brought up in the QnA thread that I want to go over:


Unagami is scaling to a single Realm, however most of the other god tiers are scaling to the whole multiverse so there’s an already existing gap between them. Even if higher god tiers were directly stated to be more powerful than Unagami, they already have the feats to prove that so an “at least” rating isn’t necessary.


The Overlord in his spiritual form is considered to have Unknown stats outside of his Durability. For some reason he’s rated with the “at least/likely far higher” thing even though he has nothing to upscale from, so he should have that part removed. That’s not the point right now, though.

It was argued that The Overlord in his Dragon Form should upscale from his Spirit Form’s durability. I’m ok with this under the right circumstances, however there are questions to be asked:
  1. Since the Overlord’s durability comes from his state of being, would Dragon Form even upscale or just be relative? The Overlord’s initial possession of Garmadon also isn’t rated with Low 1-C durability despite being just as physical as his later Dragon form.
  2. Would the gap between the Spirit and Dragon forms even be large enough to warrant an at least rating? As far as I know simply upscaling from tier 1 characters doesn’t usually give at least ratings, but I couldn’t find any mentions of that on the wiki so idk.
There’s also an issue with the profile currently linking to a Twitter statement, which I’m pretty sure isn’t allowed any more per the discussion rule for the verse. I think a statement like that is given in the series anyway, so if so it’ll just need to be replaced. If not then I guess there’d be no upscaling, however for now I’ll just assume the statement is valid.

The Solution
There are two options, which basically all depends on whether Dragon form Overlord > Spirit form Overlord warrants an “at least” rating.

Option 1:
  • Spirit form Overlord’s durability is changed to just Low 1-C.
  • All characters have their “likely far higher” part removed.
  • The characters who scale to the Crystal King and the First Spinjitzu Master have an “at least” added to their ratings.
Option 2:
  • All characters relative to or below the First Spinjitzu Master have both the “at least” and “likely far higher” parts of their ratings removed.
  • If the Overlord’s Spirit form justification is considered insufficient, then his durability will also be changed to Unknown.
I’m not sure what to do about the Source Dragon stuff in either case, as I haven’t watched Dragon’s Rising yet and have no context other than “they’re stronger than FSM”. I’ll leave that up to supporters.

Votes
Option 1:
  • Agree:
  • Disagree:
  • Neutral:
Option 2:
  • Agree:
  • Disagree:
  • Neutral:
 
The "higher" and "at least" ratings are often also used to denote scaling above just baseline.

For example imagine Kay is baseline low 1-C and has an ability that's usually a 10x multiplier. That ability would still be rated as "higher" even if it can't really be quantified as it is blatantly higher within the same tier.

For another example take it like this.
Character A shakes a 2 universe 2C structure, not even destroying it, and gets 2C from it.
Character B one shots character C who one shotted character D who one shotted character E who completely vaporized a 2 universe 2C structure.

Clearly character B should be vastly superior to character A even if we can't quantify it. So a "likely higher" could be used to cover that in-universe gap. So I don't think they're necessarily bad for the profiles if used with caution
 
"At least Low 1-C, likely higher" is because it accept that God Tier is "At least Low 1-C (4/16× Uni), likely higher (17× Uni)", but Emperor Garmadon is actually Low 1-C (16× Uni) at peak, but his Oni Form come from fight with TCK
 
Last edited:
Spirit form shouldn’t really be Low 1-C in durability at all, his existence as dark part of Balance is purely conceptual/hax-based, not something to scale durability to. But DF Overlord and FSM upscale from multiple universes and feats of Creation and Destruction, so at least/higher stuff is fine imo.
 
The "higher" and "at least" ratings are often also used to denote scaling above just baseline.

For example imagine Kay is baseline low 1-C and has an ability that's usually a 10x multiplier. That ability would still be rated as "higher" even if it can't really be quantified as it is blatantly higher within the same tier.
That’s true, yeah, but that’s not what’s happening here.

For another example take it like this.
Character A shakes a 2 universe 2C structure, not even destroying it, and gets 2C from it.
Character B one shots character C who one shotted character D who one shotted character E who completely vaporized a 2 universe 2C structure.

Clearly character B should be vastly superior to character A even if we can't quantify it. So a "likely higher" could be used to cover that in-universe gap. So I don't think they're necessarily bad for the profiles if used with caution
Yeah they’re fine if they are upscaling so much higher, I just don’t see how they do in this case.

"At least Low 1-C, likely higher" is because it accept that God Tier is "At least Low 1-C (4/16× Uni), likely higher (17× Uni)", but Emperor Garmadon is actually Low 1-C (16× Uni) at peak, but his Oni Form come from fight with TCK
So they’re only solidly scaling to 16 of the 17 realms? Which one aren’t they scaling solidly too and why?

Spirit form shouldn’t really be Low 1-C in durability at all, his existence as dark part of Balance is purely conceptual/hax-based, not something to scale durability to.
Being embodiment of something, don't make you have higher AP/Durability, it's hax-based.
Honestly I was wondering if it would even count as Low 1-C durability as well.

The Spirit form durability part replacement was already agreed in another thread, so I'll copy paste the justification here
That’s good to know. So the question now is if that actually gives Low 1-C for him, and if so if “at least” for Dragon form is warranted.
 
So they’re only solidly scaling to 16 of the 17 realms? Which one aren’t they scaling solidly too and why?
Characters (who scales to Oni Army) has solid 16× Uni
  • Emperor Garmadon at peak
  • Oni Army
  • The Overlord
  • FSM
  • Etc..
Characters (who scales to FSM/The Overlord) are scales to solid 16× Uni, likely 17× Uni.

Because they scales to Overlord's powers, who possibly would destroyed 17 realms

Source Dragon is solid 17× Uni, as they can destroy all of existence
 
Characters (who scales to Oni Army) has solid 16× Uni
  • Emperor Garmadon at peak
  • Oni Army
  • The Overlord
  • FSM
  • Etc..
Characters (who scales to FSM/The Overlord) are scales to solid 16× Uni, likely 17× Uni.

Because they scales to Overlord's powers, who possibly would destroyed 17 realms

Source Dragon is solid 17× Uni, as they can destroy all of existence
So 16x is because of Djinnjago being destroyed, I presume. I thought scaling to the Balance gave them solid 17x Uni scaling, but I guess not.
 
Should be you change OP? Since it's only downgrade for Overlord Spirit key, other thing shouldn't get downgrade since it's misunderstood
Yeah, I’m gonna reconstruct the OP soon once I’ve got the time and energy. It’s late rn so I might not have time today but I’ll hopefully fix it by tomorrow.
 
The Spirit form durability part replacement was already agreed in another thread, so I'll copy paste the justification here
Btw which episode(s) do these two scans come from so I can find them? I can’t actually read these specific links because Imgur is blocked for me lol. I didn’t think I’d need to see them so I didn’t ask before, but now I do.
 
Btw which episode(s) do these two scans come from so I can find them? I can’t actually read these specific links because Imgur is blocked for me lol. I didn’t think I’d need to see them so I didn’t ask before, but now I do.
In order: Lego Website (old 2012-2013 version), Book of Spinjitzu and Dark Island Trilogy (The 2nd book I think)
 
In order: Lego Website (old 2012-2013 version), Book of Spinjitzu and Dark Island Trilogy (The 2nd book I think)
Damn they’re not from the show itself, huh…

Ah well. I don’t have the time to look for them myself, but I don’t think I need needed them.
 
Back
Top