Qurbonboev
He/Him- 2,779
- 1,680
Why would regen help from it? She would just go insane from knowledge of Yog existingI was actually wondering the same thing. It appears that Shiro doesn't resist that but maybe her Regen will help ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why would regen help from it? She would just go insane from knowledge of Yog existingI was actually wondering the same thing. It appears that Shiro doesn't resist that but maybe her Regen will help ?
Iris madness is only type 3 thoughAlso, it's in the peerage holder blog, the madness res. That's a necessary resistance to be near Isis already
Figured it was somewhere but couldn't find it on the profile.Also, it's in the peerage holder blog, the madness res. That's a necessary resistance to be near Isis already
What type is this ? All types ?Enhanced Mind Manipulation, Soul Manipulation, Fear Manipulation, Madness Manipulation, Memory Manipulation, & Empathic Manipulation: 3 layers
It appears we have layered incons with 4 NLF Haxes
That Madness Type 2 is doing nothing. He needs proof of interacting with the plot abstract, and Shiro has resistance to mind manipulation, plus unconventional resistance. Yog-Sothoth would need proof of interacting with the soul in order to interact with the mind in the first place.Iris madness is only type 3 though
type 3Figured it was somewhere but couldn't find it on the profile.
What type is this ? All types ?
I don't think type 2 would be helpful here, since resisting Isis stuff also includes needing to resist mind shenanigans which I think is also layered on their end. That plus the plot abstract since epilogue is the a system of the end itselfIris madness is only type 3 though
Biggest incon of our livesIt appears we have layered incons with 4 NLF Haxes.
This is I will punish you and make Klein vs Yog next time.Mind you, Yog only has 1-A outta pity. I just didn’t wanna bother anymore but his rating is highkey nonsensical
Technically it’s “Possibly Klein wins”.This is I will punish you and make Klein vs Yog next time.
You will see how Ac5 carries match to incon against 4 layers
peak way to take advantage of someone with a possible rating versus someone with a full rating is something no one has done beforeTechnically it’s “Possibly Klein wins”.
Same with this match. So I’ma vote Vernall
Unfortunately it’s lwk one of the best examples of Acausality 5. CM is permanently an incon merchant, basically.If Aca Type 5 gets disproved
I would say it’s for the lols. I have close to zero confidence in that verse actually having CM 1, and even that Nep, with all aspects, is wanked, someone added in all aspects without a crt.Also, I noticed something but why does Yog have CM1? Or is it just for the lols?
In that case, I was wondering how Klein would interact with him since he literally controls the universal concept of change. Maybe he could remove Yog’s acausality or sum stupid shit like that. It’s very funny to think about it nonetheless.I would say it’s just for the lols. I have zero confidence in that verse actually having CM 1, and even that Nep, with all aspects, is wanked, someone added in all aspects without a crt.
Regarding being able to remove Acausality Type 5, it becomes possible if Klein not only controls the universal concept of change but can also impose or enforce that concept upon beings or reality. In that case, he would be forcing entities that do not participate in the concept of change to partake in it. Acausality Type 5 is what it is because the character possessing it does not participate in causality-driven change and is therefore changeless.In that case, I was wondering how Klein would interact with him since he literally controls the universal concept of change. Maybe he could remove Yog’s acausality or sum stupid shit like that. It’s very funny to think about it nonetheless.
As I said, it's pretty interesting to think about. But also I realized that Yog's Acausality works pretty differently depending on where he scales. If he's High 1-B (which is what he truly is), he is about as immutable as an eternalist universe is. If he's 1-A, then he's immutable because he's indivisible. Both of them have very different mechanics.Regarding being able to remove Acausality Type 5, it becomes possible if Klein not only controls the universal concept of change but can also impose or enforce that concept upon beings or reality. In that case, he would be forcing entities that do not participate in the concept of change to partake in it. Acausality Type 5 is what it is because the character possessing it does not participate in causality-driven change and is therefore changeless.
Wouldn't that be contradictory to AC-5 which makes you “unchangeable” to an extent via being outside Cause & Effect.In that case, I was wondering how Klein would interact with him since he literally controls the universal concept of change. Maybe he could remove Yog’s acausality or sum stupid shit like that. It’s very funny to think about it nonetheless
I think the general idea is that they are unaffected by Concepts asw (unless said Concept originates from a Qualitatively higher reality) since they are essentially outside of causality of the reality they are in.I think in this case you would need proof this ability can affect acaus 5 type characters, and their type of causality. Since they technically work under some "meta" causality from what I have seen. So they're beyond that system of change entirely and what they are manipulating
I'm pretty sure meta-causality is a disqualifier though. Since Type 5 is just to say that X character can never go from state-of-affairs-Y to any other state-of-affairs-Z for any given reason (on their level of reality).I think in this case you would need proof this ability can affect acaus 5 type characters, and their type of causality. Since they technically work under some "meta" causality from what I have seen. So they're beyond that system of change entirely and what they are manipulating
Never really seen a case removing acausality 5 like that. I mean cool if it works that way, new meta of acaus 5 interaction 🗣
Yea but what I'm talking about here is in what way it is outside of change. I even mentioned above how Yog's immutability would work completely different depending on how he scales, so it can't be that all Acausalities work the same (I mean, we explicitly differentiate it from Tier 0 Acausality)Wouldn't that be contradictory to AC-5 which makes you “unchangeable” to an extent via being outside Cause & Effect.
Wouldn't that be contradictory to AC-5 which makes you “unchangeable” to an extent via being outside Cause & Effect.
It is not a problem since it is not Tier 0, as changeless is not absolute then. It’s the same way as removing immunities. For example, a being who doesn’t participate in the concept of burning will be immune to burning no matter how much you increase it. The only way to make them burn is to impose the concept of burning onto them. Acausality Type 5 works the same way, this time being cause-and-effect change. So it is only logical that imposing the concept of change would work, and then they will be able to change.It's like an immovable force vs Unstoppable Object scenario.
Will the Concept of Change to Change someone Unchangeable, or Will the Unchangeable object be unchanged because it's can't Change. Think about that in the shower.
I think calling it meta is a way of saying their independence is "transcendent", because yeah the only real immutability is tier 0. But the functions of change are something beneath them in their level of reality.I'm pretty sure meta-causality is a disqualifier though. Since Type 5 is just to say that X character can never go from state-of-affairs-Y to any other state-of-affairs-Z for any given reason (on their level of reality).
Yea but for thatas changeless is not absolute then. It’s the same way as removing immunities. For example, a being who doesn’t participate in the concept of burning will be immune to burning no matter how much you increase it. The only way to make them burn is to impose the concept of burning onto them. Acausality Type 5 works the same way, this time being cause-and-effect change. So it is only logical that imposing the concept of change would work, and then they will be able to change
Koreaman is only mini boss, Chinese man with dual cultivation lvl 3000 in the nascent stage with lvl 20 Dao farming speed is the main boss. (Yes I am aware LOTM is Chinese asw)Koreaman
This just depends on how the character is immutable though. Which is where the issue lies.Yea but for that
- You need direct proof of the character having done something very similar.
- Have the concepts originate from a higher plane of existence.
AC-5 and immunity is a bit different per se, AC-5 means you are Unchangeable in the sense that no action that follows causality can effect you. Inducing the concept of Change follow causality.
Let's take X and Y with X having said CM and Y being AC-5
[X uses the Concept of Change on Y] --> [Y Changes]
(Cause) ------------------------------> (Effect)
The whole action of using CM follows an ordered cause & effect thus Y by default should be immune to that.
I mean yea but most AC-5 have clear cut outside causality statements with no anti feats in which case I don't think CM will work on them unless any of the two previously mentioned conditions are met.This just depends on how the character is immutable though. Which is where the issue lies.
Aside from depending on how the character is immutable, I would say that, following your logic, AC-5 performing any action would also be an anti-feat, since that too involves cause and effect, which includes fighting and so on.Yea but for that
- You need direct proof of the character having done something very similar.
- Have the concepts originate from a higher plane of existence.
AC-5 and immunity is a bit different per se, AC-5 means you are Unchangeable in the sense that no action that follows causality can effect you. Inducing the concept of Change follow causality.
Let's take X and Y with X having said CM and Y being AC-5
[X uses the Concept of Change on Y] --> [Y Changes]
(Cause) ------------------------------> (Effect)
The whole action of using CM follows an ordered cause & effect thus Y by default should be immune to that.
Also, I noticed something but why does Yog have CM1? Or is it just for the lols?
Wait till you see AC 5 plot and transduality reasons for warhammerI would say it’s for the lols. I have close to zero confidence in that verse actually having CM 1, and even that Nep, with all aspects, is wanked, someone added in all aspects without a crt.
I believe it is or it was when I read about it like a year ago, that's why I mentioned they are an Ultimate incon merchant and that's also why it's hard to get. Any action involving cause & effect should act as an anti feat for it.Aside from depending on how the character is immutable, I would say that, following your logic, AC-5 performing any action would also be an anti-feat, since that too involves cause and effect, which includes fighting and so on.
Like I said it's not strictly an immunity but rather unconventional immunity if that makes sense. Also I am not saying that they are immune to the Concept of Change but rather that if one were to argue enforcing the concept of Change on them, the former needs to be the one showing proof and not the latter because by default anyone with Ac-5 benefits from an Unconventional Immunity which is why I mentioned my first point.So if we set that aside, they would be immune to the concept of Change if it is merely manipulation. However, they would not automatically be immune to the enforcement of the concept of Change without proof, as that is a direct counter to being immune to cause-and-effect changes, as stated here: immunity is not an absolute defense.
You need direct proof of the character having done something very similar.
Lwk forgot they updated this hax lol. I should prob add it for OC or sumimmunity is not an absolute defense.
Also I just realised that this was supposed to be a VS thread
....
Wanker stop wankingLwk forgot they updated this hax lol. I should prob add it for OC or sum
Essentially yes imo which is what I said,I think you would need proof said concept of change can affect something that doesn't just lack the cause and effect, but essentially exists above it. It's like trying to enforce a lower system to someone who has basically lost that restriction by ascending it. Kinda different from just forcefully applying an aspect simply from lacking it I'd say.
It's like X trying to affect Y with some concept, but actually Y isn't even in that same system anymore and became a number instead or something, where that change to the former letter is a non-factor. Hence you need specific feats for it
You need direct proof of the character having done something very similar.
Interesting that one of these dimension beast also deals mental damage just by existing, of course doesn't work on Kaito or Peak Counts.![]()
Cthulu Mythos exists in Isekai at Peace
Shiro solos