• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

An issue I have with Yogiri Takatou

Status
Not open for further replies.
Messages
19,326
Reaction score
12,030
Imagine making a CRT saying that Goku shouldn't have Martial Arts. This would be completely and utterly ridiculous, right? Because it is, as Goku is not only pretty much within the very definition of Martial Arts, but he's one of the very first characters that gets out in the overall pop culture when asking about a fictional character who is a martial artist.

The issue I have here is about Yogiri's Death Manipulation, as I believe that he definitely should get it back, and it's completely ridiculous to argue otherwise.

The juice

The main arguments of the thread on why Yogiri's basically lying when he says that he inflicts death to people are the following:
  • It "kills" even inanimated stuff or only limited parts of living beings, and can erase people on a fundamental level.
  • Erasing magical power means the death of that being as a side-effect.
I do not particulairly agree with the notion that Death Manipulation cannot do this. In fact, it relies on the misconception that Death Manipulation can only mean "forcing physical death on people", when the page itself mentions this:
Death Manipulation is the ability to directly induce death in beings, objects or even concepts via supernatural means. This can manifest as the inexplicable death of an individual, the direct cessation of biological functions, dispersal of life force and more, being able to affect anything from plant and animal life to possibly even abstract forces and concepts.
This is important, as you cannot do stuff like giving heart attacks or suffocation to abstract concepts, as these things are literally etheral beings that lack any biological or physical function, they're absolutely not really "living" in the same way a biological creature does, so why is the Instant Death killing people like UEG on a fundamental level, or killing inanimated beings suddenly problematic? By "killing" a concept you're pretty much erasing them as they cannot really just "lay down dead", but they'd just stop existing, given that a concept is either there, or is not, and no in-between. Plus let's not act as if fiction cannot do stuff like erasing beings who are already voids (too many cases to count, I think at least everyone here knows an example of this) or mind haxxing inanimated objects like Giygas, does this mean that these abilities stop being what they're shown to be only because they "affect stuff that they shouldn't"? The above point is funny too, given that in-universe what I said was basically repeated, lol.

The magical power side effect thing seems to be damning, however we have this in the Death Manipulation page still:
It is important to note that just causing death via other abilities or indirect means (such as soul destruction, physical damage, deconstruction etc.) in itself does not qualify for Death Manipulation unless it is specified or portrayed to be a direct inducement of death in its targets with these being aftereffects of that.
This is also important, given that everything in-universe, even the fiction's main title or even the narrator quite literally describes the ability as "death" or killing, you cannot say that all of these are lies, come on. The thing I said about the page saying you can "kill" concepts also applies, Yogiri is indeed inducing death via some kind of EE, but the verse portrays it as a direct inducement of death constantly, to the point of it being part of its title ffs. It's also funnt

My proposal is simple: replace the "Unconventional Existence Erasure" with "Death Manipulation" once again, and make everything that's a result of Yogiri's Instant Death a subset of his Death/Concept hax, similar to how Caine's Reality Warping or Yukari's Conceptual Manipulation are worded, with these abilities being the main one, and the rest just a specific application of said main ability, and him "erasing" the Magical Power should be the result of him "killing" it, given that he also can delay the death of people akin to the Death Note.
 
I mean, the main issue really is that the "death" thing is how Yogiri perceives his power; he stated multiple times in the novel that he wasn't aware of his own power specificities, nor how it works. The whole "kill stuff" is really just a running joke of the novel. We do know that his "death hax" isn't a death hax like any other character, either.

The "people die" is simply a consequence of what he does (erasing/killing magical power).

If you simply go with the "He erases one thing, and the rest dies", Unconventional EE is still fine.
 
I mean, the main issue really is that the "death" thing is how Yogiri perceives his power; he stated multiple times in the novel that he wasn't aware of his own power specificities, nor how it works. The whole "kill stuff" is really just a running joke of the novel. We do know that his "death hax" isn't a death hax like any other character, either.

The "people die" is simply a consequence of what he does (erasing/killing magical power).

If you simply go with the "He erases one thing, and the rest dies", Unconventional EE is still fine.
As I said in Discord, the note we have on the Death Manipulation page about portrayal of it being inducement of death being still enough for it to classify as that hax despite "only" doing things like shutting down biological functions, otherwise nothing would even qualify for it (Death Note without Death Manipulation despite only causing heart attacks [biological hax], making scenarios where people die [Fate Manipulation] or causing people to suicide in-universe [Mind hax], can you imagine that!?).

The Death Manipulation page says that you can kill concepts, and I concepts are not really "living", as said in OP they either exist or not, and erasing them is the only way to trully "kill" those, only that it's the in-universe portrayal that does the trick. You have to argue for the Death Manipulation page. Like, I understand your argument that Yogiri induces death by erasing the source, but that's still possible by Death hax according to the page.
 
As I said in Discord, the note we have on the Death Manipulation page about portrayal of it being inducement of death being still enough for it to classify as that hax despite "only" doing things like shutting down biological functions, otherwise nothing would even qualify for it (Death Note without Death Manipulation despite only causing heart attacks [biological hax], making scenarios where people die [Fate Manipulation] or causing people to suicide in-universe [Mind hax], can you imagine that!?).
This is the issue tho, from the perspective of anyone, it would act as Death Manipulation. I mean, let's say you had the same power as him. You erase the magical power of some guy, and he falls flat on the floor. Would you say you killed him? Would you say he's dead? Obviously, yet that's not what happened directly/at the source.
The Death Manipulation page says that you can kill concepts, and I concepts are not really "living", as said in OP they either exist or not, and erasing them is the only way to trully "kill" those, only that it's the in-universe portrayal that does the trick. You have to argue for the Death Manipulation page. Like, I understand your argument that Yogiri induces death by erasing the source, but that's still possible by Death hax according to the page.
Yeah, I know you can do that, I'm saying that what he does is different from just "killing concept", he erases the magical power. That's what Ultimate God stated and since it's the most recent piece of information, I'm tempted to believe him. There is also the scene with UEG "losing her sense of self"/vanishing until nothing remains that links directly with how "when Magical Power disappears, you lose yourself" stuff.
 
This is the issue tho, from the perspective of anyone, it would act as Death Manipulation. I mean, let's say you had the same power as him. You erase the magical power of some guy, and he falls flat on the floor. Would you say you killed him? Would you say he's dead? Obviously, yet that's not what happened directly/at the source.

Yeah, I know you can do that, I'm saying that what he does is different from just "killing concept", he erases the magical power. That's what Ultimate God stated and since it's the most recent piece of information, I'm tempted to believe him. There is also the scene with UEG "losing her sense of self"/vanishing until nothing remains that links directly with how "when Magical Power disappears, you lose yourself" stuff.
This does not really refutes my idea that Death Manipulation can indeed come as a replacement of direct "effects" like Fate/Biological hax, otherwise not even the Death Note would have the ability given that all of its stuff can be replaced by other abilities and still "work", so does my idea with EE when dealing with incorporeal stuff.

As I've said to you, we had a thread about this right to address this concern that portrayal is key here.
 
This does not really refutes my idea that Death Manipulation can indeed come as a replacement of direct "effects" like Fate/Biological hax, otherwise not even the Death Note would have the ability given that all of its stuff can be replaced by other abilities and still "work", so does my idea with EE when dealing with incorporeal stuff.
Isn't the Death Note literally stated to inflict death tho and that "heart attack" is just the standard way for them to die?
As I've said to you, we had a thread about this right to address this concern that portrayal is key here.
Meh. I'll wait for staff then, I don't think it changes much ultimately.
 
make everything that's a result of Yogiri's Instant Death a subset of his Death/Concept hax, similar to how Caine's Reality Warping or Yukari's Conceptual Manipulation are worded, with these abilities being the main one, and the rest just a specific application of said main ability, and him "erasing" the Magical Power should be the result of him "killing" it, given that he also can delay the death of people akin to the Death Note.
I do agree with this, but instead of death manipulation, unconventional EE would work. Was planning to do that, but never actually got around that.
 
Death Manip is essentially the ability to induce death in an opponent (or anything existing), regardless of what specific mechanism verse or event uses to achieve it. Whether it is achieved through shutting down biological functions or EE them out of the world.

Seems reasonable.
 
How tf did he lose Death Manipulation in the first place? Next you'll tell me Doomsday doesn't have Reactive Evolution and Kratos and Asura don't have Rage Power.

Jokes aside, yeah this makes sense. Death Manipulation is also determined by how it's presented, else every single use of this power would be something else.
 
I agree, this is clear

I now feel from here the hatred and anger of the haters over these approvals to the point that I found people on Discord crying because of this approval. Believe it or not, I mean, imagine crying because of a character...

Anyway, this is just a small promotion because the next one is more beautiful. You will cry more and more
 
I agree, this is clear

I now feel from here the hatred and anger of the haters over these approvals to the point that I found people on Discord crying because of this approval. Believe it or not, I mean, imagine crying because of a character...

Anyway, this is just a small promotion because the next one is more beautiful. You will cry more and more
Dude, don't. None cares about what randoms off-site say, if they disagree then nothing stops them from coming here.
 
I agree, this is clear

I now feel from here the hatred and anger of the haters over these approvals to the point that I found people on Discord crying because of this approval. Believe it or not, I mean, imagine crying because of a character...

Anyway, this is just a small promotion because the next one is more beautiful. You will cry more and more
Enough of the drama baiting. Give your opinion on the CRT and move on.
 
I agree, this is clear

I now feel from here the hatred and anger of the haters over these approvals to the point that I found people on Discord crying because of this approval. Believe it or not, I mean, imagine crying because of a character...

Anyway, this is just a small promotion because the next one is more beautiful. You will cry more and more
what did we talk about that attitude....

anyways agree, how tf do u even lose ts LMAO
 
Looks reasonable to me.
Death Manip is essentially the ability to induce death in an opponent (or anything existing), regardless of what specific mechanism verse or event uses to achieve it. Whether it is achieved through shutting down biological functions or EE them out of the world.

Seems reasonable.
How tf did he lose Death Manipulation in the first place? Next you'll tell me Doomsday doesn't have Reactive Evolution and Kratos and Asura don't have Rage Power.

Jokes aside, yeah this makes sense. Death Manipulation is also determined by how it's presented, else every single use of this power would be something else.
Looks simple enough.
Yeah, this is oke
So, I have made this sandbox with the P&A as it should be reworded in the 1st key, if there's a complaint I'll be hearing.
 
# Senses


# Instant Death Ability

Capabilities:


Automatic Defenses:


# True Form


# Miscellaneous

 
Also, I think killing "senses" should be re-added under that format, but unsure of the correct wording.
I removed it here, since it didn't fit the ability, but it is a feat for his Death ability nonetheless, so it should be listed under death manipulation, but without "perception manipulation" ability.
 
Also, I think killing "senses" should be re-added under that format, but unsure of the correct wording.
I removed it here, since it didn't fit the ability, but it is a feat for his Death ability nonetheless, so it should be listed under death manipulation, but without "perception manipulation" ability.
I think it should be Perception Manipulation tbh.

Yogiri killing one's senses does not just make them go blind as if their eyes were pierced. Iirc, a character took out the eyes of the one who went blind and regenerated them from scratch yet they still were blind due to his sight being killed. And iirc Yogiri also killed one's hearing and so the character can't, not only hear, but also receive information from telepathy.

Edit: Yeah, it's on his profile's respect thread
 
Yeah no,it's just cm3 EE causing people to die
Does the Death Note have only Fate hax lil bro?
Also, I think killing "senses" should be re-added under that format, but unsure of the correct wording.
I removed it here, since it didn't fit the ability, but it is a feat for his Death ability nonetheless, so it should be listed under death manipulation, but without "perception manipulation" ability.
This is not the CRT for it, sorry.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top