• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

The Most Troublesome Buu: Buu scaling revision

Status
Not open for further replies.
'With Goku having grown stronger, he is able to fight on par with Kid Buu, even being stated to have the power to obliterate him instantly with max power'
I'm fine with that
I think the wording should be a little different. It is said that Goku’s full power is not enough to defeat Kid Buu; however, the statement you’re referring to is him charging Ki for a minute.

Anyway, I posted the proof in the justification. If you want, you guys can change the wording or add even more.

I would say:

With Goku having grown stronger and pushed beyond its limits, and not holding back anymore, he is stated to be the strongest warrior by the author, manga and guidebooks. He is able to contend with Kid Buu, even stating that if he could charge up his KI for a minute, he could have wipe him out.

For Kid Buu, it can be:

Having his Kaioshins’s absorptions being undone, he grow up in power. He has been stated several times by the author and Guidebooks to the be strongest Majin, meaning he is stronger than his previous forms, shown superiority over Goku, and could halt the Super Genkidama, the last hope of the universe with immeasurable force, before Goku needed to turn into a Super Saiyan and his energy restored on top.”
 
I don't think it would justify it necessarily as we don't know that he's envisioning the strongest versions of each character that he's fighting. For example, Frieza is not in his 100% form in his imagination. It could be as simple as he's just envisioning the major opponents that he's personally fought before, as he didn't directly fight Buuhan as himself.
That 'form' is just Freeza going full power in his Final Form. Which Goku envisions Freeza as using. Notably the manga never depicts the 100% state anywhere. Even when Freeza has Frost go full power and exhaust his energy like in the anime. Which would indicate Toyotaro, for whatever reason, simply has zero interest in depicting that bulked up full power. Similarly Roshi never uses his full power 'form' in the manga either. He remains skinny the entire Tournament of Power. Even in the RoF flashback Roshi is skinny.

Point being, even when Toyotaro shows members of Freeza's race goes full power he doesn't bulk them up. And when he has Roshi going all out in fights he doesn't have him bulk up, even in a RoF flashback where he fought in only his bulked state. This is even when Toyotaro explicitly tells readers to watch the RoF movie to learn what happens. Granted, in the promotional manga for the RoF film he does at least show a bulked up Roshi there.

Regardless it can simply be explained as either:
1) Goku is taking his 're-run' seriously so he isn't allowing Freeza to go full power like before.​
2) Toyotaro simply doesn't depict Freeza's race as bulking up when using their full power. Could be preference. Could be something else. But he clearly has a preference against it when he consciously depicts Frost as not bulking up at full power, unlike the anime.​
EDIT: Additionally, an Interval Special breaking down forms in the manga continuity doesn't distinguish Full Power as a separate form from Final Form Freeza.
 
@CryoTheMayo Sure, that's fair enough. I just wouldn't say that it counts as direct evidence of Kid Buu's superiority over Buuhan though I can understand why some people would interpret it as such.
 
@CryoTheMayo Sure, that's fair enough. I just wouldn't say that it counts as direct evidence of Kid Buu's superiority over Buuhan though I can understand why some people would interpret it as such.
So this means that nothing contradicts Goku envisioning the strongest enemies he's ever witnessed?
 
So this means that nothing contradicts Goku envisioning the strongest enemies he's ever witnessed?
I don't believe it's directly stated that Goku is envisioning the strongest enemies he's ever witnessed. Without making additional assumptions all we see is him visualizing the final / most recent form of each of those opponents when he last fought them.
 
I don't believe it's directly stated that Goku is envisioning the strongest enemies he's ever witnessed. Without making additional assumptions all we see is him visualizing the final / most recent form of each of those opponents when he last fought them.
Damage. Out of curiosity. What is Goku's lifelong motivator for seeking and desiring stronger opponents? Why does he endlessly train? And remind us what the start of Daima, a canon continuation of the original manga, says about Goku's power not even one year after the Buu Saga?
 
I don't believe it's directly stated that Goku is envisioning the strongest enemies he's ever witnessed.
But he literally is. What do you think the mental training is even for?
Without making additional assumptions all we see is him visualizing the final / most recent form of each of those opponents when he last fought them.
WIthout assumptions? Alright lets go over it. What do we see exactly?
Goku fighting final form Frieza. Who is Frieza?
  • The strongest person in his respective arc, far as villains go.
Goku envisioning Cell? Who is Cell exactly?
  • The strongest villain of that respective arc in his strongest form.
Goku fighting Kid Buu? Who is Kid Buu?
  • The final form of Buu that Goku went up against after personally witnessing all his forms prior to his defeat. That same form having countless statements to be the strongest enemy outright.
Can you not see the clear formula the story is trying to display here Damage? Goku is trying to get stronger by facing his past strongest enemies. The enemies he has literally witnissed first hand and who he knows the strength level of. Nitpicking this just feels weird to me. At what point is it not just brushing aside anything that proves your point wrong?
 
if im being honest, kid buu being the strongest really comes off as an afterthought/retcon
honestly this makes the most sense 😭😭 kid buu was the last z villain so ig they just say hes the strongest although a retcon would mean that he is now considered the stronger than buuhan
 
I'm pretty sure Toriyama was not the kind of person who would change his mind the second he finished the manga and decide to make Kid Buy the strongest from nowhere. There's tons of evidence that he is the strongest literally in the Z Manga. For it to be a retcon, Buuhan would need some implications showing that he was the strongest, which he doesn't have unlike Kid Buu when he just started to appear.
 
honestly this makes the most sense 😭😭 kid buu was the last z villain so ig they just say hes the strongest
im personally neutral

the manga, at least to me, makes it clear thag buutenks and buuhan were stronger

but super, daima, and some other statements go with goku and kid buu being stronger

i would personally go with the manga, honestly, but whatever yall choose for the profiles i don't mind

though i disagree with a few things:
A: goku WAS NOT one shotting kid buu, tf r yall on😭😭😭😭😭
B: ss3 being a variable multiplier
 
But he literally is. What do you think the mental training is even for?
Said mental training was interrupted by Goten falling by the way. Just because the last opponent we see him about to fight is Kid Buu, is not the same thing as Kid Buu is the strongest thing he can imagine fighting.

Can you not see the clear formula the story is trying to display here damage? Goku is trying to get stronger by facing his past strongest enemies. The enemies he has literally witnissed first hand and who he knows the strength level of. Nitpicking this just feels weird to me. At what point is it not just brushing aside anything that proves your point wrong?
A "formula" for storytelling is not a hard rule set that the story cannot subvert or just not follow at times. I've seen some of the statements brought up like "Check out both sides which keep transforming to get stronger and stronger, and the Genki-Dama at the end" and a literal reading of that would mean that both sides do nothing but keep getting stronger and stronger but an actual read of the events shows that this isn't literally the case. Buu does transform get stronger by absorbing Gotenks, but then he gets weaker once Gotenks splits apart. Buu does transform to get stronger by abosrbing Gohan, but then he gets weaker once Gohan and the others are removed from him. It is not a constantly escalating power-level here, but one that varies up and down depending on circumstance. Only Buff Buu is stated to rise in Chi compared to Super Buu; if Goku and Vegeta thought for a second that Kid Buu held that same level of power or even higher than they would have reacted to it. I think that you too are brushing aside this issue with the reasoning of "Buu's power level is hard to gauge" but that wasn't an issue for Goku and Vegeta previously when measuring Super Buu's power level changes. As for other statements gathered from guidebooks like "Goku's feelings understood by his fellow strongest", the information gathered from guidebooks will always be secondary to the events of the actual manga. I respect your viewpoint for trying to encompass as many sources of information as possible but everything I get from the manga itself points to me that Kid Buu is not superior to Buuhan, and is unlikely to be superior to Super Buu. I could possibly see a scaling chain where Kid Buu is superior to Super Buu, but not above Gohan and characters stronger than Gohan.

Now, since we read statements in the manga differently I don't think I could ever "prove" my stance is correct to you; Goku's statement about acknowledging inferiority to Super Buy while inside Buu's body is evidence to me, but it's not evidence to you because you have a different interpretation of what Goku is saying. If you could imagine that my interpretation of Goku's statement is correct, then could you at least see why I have so much of an issue with this proposal where Goku is seemingly worried about regular Super Buu but then has a completely even fight against someone who is supposed two power-ups higher than Buuhan? Even if you disagree with me, you can understand why this seems wrong to me?
 
Last edited:
Said mental training was interrupted by Goten falling by the way.
What does that have to do with anything exactly? Why are you pivoting?
The point is that Goku is literally training to get stronger and stronger. Why fight weaker enemies than the ones he has faced? That doesn't even make sense whatsoever.
Just because the last opponent we see him about to fight is Kid Buu, is not the same thing as Kid Buu is the strongest thing he can imagine fighting.
Why not? We are shown Goku facing the strongest enemies of their respective arcs. Are you going to claim Frieza and Cell were not the strongest? That would be absurd right? Okay if you aren't saying that, then why does this not apply to Kid Buu all of a sudden?
Where's Buuhan? Where's Buutenks? In your case, where's Super Buu? Would Goku not get stronger by gauging his strength relative to the absolute strongest he's witnessed? That goes against the entire point dude. You aren't really explaining WHY this wouldn't be the case.
You're just saying "It's not the same thing" or "it doesn't have to be this". It comes across as you just brushing off literally everything.
A "formula" for storytelling is not a hard rule set that the story cannot subvert or just not follow at times.
But if you can prove consistency, it is your job to prove that it is not consistent.
If there's no contradiction, how can you claim the formula is not being applied in specific instances?
What basis does that claim have Damage? As far as I can see, you don't really have one. Which is fine, but at least be willing to admit you're kind of talking based on claims that hold less validity than the ones you're opposing.
I've seen some of the statements brought up like "Check out both sides which keep transforming to get stronger and stronger, and the Genki-Dama at the end" and a literal reading of that would mean that both sides do nothing but keep getting stronger and stronger but an actual read of the events shows that this isn't literally the case.
But it literally is the case. Infinite even posted more scans that claim as much.
Toriyama says both sides until the very end get stronger, and now it's just wrong..because what exactly?
He literally couldn't be anymore clear on what he's trying to convey in the story. Especially how he thinks having the last enemy be weaker than the previous would be boring for readers. That's the thing Damage. All of our claims are back up by heavy consistency with how it was intended to be, and in the actual story.
Buu does transform get stronger by absorbing Gotenks, but then he gets weaker once Gotenks splits apart. Buu does transform to get stronger by abosrbing Gohan, but then he gets weaker once Gohan and the others are removed from him.
And then he transforms AGAIN and is said to regain the lost power from the absorptions he had as his time as Pure Buu. So what now?
There are no contradictions, it's stated they both pushed beyond the limit of what they were previously, Toriyama says they both got stronger until the end, that Buu was the strongest enemy, that the final enemy is the strongest.
All of this is basically being handwaved by you nitpicking everything to try and find some sort of hole when it simply doesn't exist.
'Yeah Toriyama REALLY meant that Buu got stronger at the end EXCEPT for Kid Buu'
So Toriyama lied and both sides didn't get stronger?
Toriyama didn't make the final villain the strongest for what reason exactly? He just decided not to do it for Kid Buu specifically? Okay then, why?
It is not a constantly escalating power-level here, but one that varies up and down depending on circumstance.
Damage. The end result of all the confrontations ends in Buu getting stronger.
Getting temporary power decreases just to then get a stronger one panels later is not contradictory to Toriyama's statements.
You have to look at it in the context of the story.
Did Buu get weaker by losing Gotenks? Yes.
What happened afterwards? Buu got STRONGER when he absorbed Gohan.
Did Buu lose the absorptions? Yes.
What happened afterwards? Kid Buu was noted to have gotten STRONGER yet again. This is literally what happens dude. He gets stronger every single time OVERALL until the very end. It's extremely easy to comprehend this. You're making it harder than it has to be for no reason here.
Your argument comes down to headcanon on what Toriyama meant, and is completely founded on the belief that Toriyama is just somehow wrong here.
Only Buff Buu is stated to rise in Chi compared to Super Buu;
No that isn't true.
I already told you that the power reduction was stated for KID BUU IN GENERAL.
That entire Supreme Kai story? The power reduction talks about to Kid Buu. Since he's now pure evil and lost everything that held him back, he is now the strongest he's ever been since he has no more Heart. Something which quite literally, EVERY other Buu had.
He isn't referring to Buff Buu for the power reduction, he's talking about Kid Buu in general.
Heart=Less power/power restriction.
Less Heart=Greater power.
if Goku and Vegeta thought for a second that Kid Buu held that same level of power or even higher than they would have reacted to it.
Already explained to you that Buu's power is hard to read, Buu suppressed himself, Goku and Vegeta got cocky because of the size.
Why did Goku only smile instead of being absolutely in disbelief that he was getting stronger?
And again, they literally ate their words after saying they could take Kid Buu. They ran away from him and stated they could NOT stop his attack.
Stop taking the momentary reactions from Goku and Vegeta as definitive proof when it was literally disproven a second later.
Did Vegeta not stated that Kid Buu's power was beyond his imagination? That's direct evidence that they messed up earlier in underestimating him without the full spill.
I think that you too are brushing aside this issue with the reasoning of "Buu's power level is hard to gauge" but that wasn't an issue from Goku and Vegeta previously when measuring Super Buu's power level changes.
What? Being able to get a read on Buu's power absolutely does NOT debunk it still being hard to gauge at times.
What about Piccolo clearly knowing Super Buu got stronger while still underestimating his true power? He thought Base Gotenks could win just for him to get smacked up a second later. This doesn't help your point here. Nobody said his Ki was unreadable like you're implying here.
As for other statements gathered from guidebooks like "Goku's feelings understood by his fellow strongest", the information gathered from guidebooks will always be secondary to the events of the actual manga.
I know they are secondary, but lets not act like we don't have statements from the literal author who back up these notions, alright?
When nearly every single piece of official licensed material states Kid Buu is the strongest enemy, including Dragon Ball Super and Akira Toriyama, you think that should just get ignored over and we should just take the character with infinitely less statements and implications? That doesn't make any sense dude. DBS literally confirms Kid Buu is the strongest on two separate occasions. Infinite posted more statements that help Kid Buu's case as well.
Toriyama's words shape his manga. He is the author after all.
I respect your viewpoint for trying to encompass as many sources of information as possible but everything I get from the manga itself points to me that Kid Buu is not superior to Buuhan, and is unlikely to be superior to Super Buu.
Yet you've continually made wild leaps and judgement, ignored every single piece of information in favor of Kid Buu, ignored Toriyama's words outright, getting information wrong on the lore of Kid Buu and how his power actual works, and you want me to believe you 'respect' my viewpoint?
Damage, it doesn't come across that way to me when you're calling the author wrong and nitpicking his statements to make them seem like they are just pure nonsense. That's the feeling I'm getting in my personal view.
Whether you are coming off that was on purpose or not, the point still stands. I don't feel as though you are acting in good faith.
I could possibly see a scaling chain where Kid Buu is superior to Super Buu, but not above Gohan and characters stronger than Gohan.
Okay then why not go with Qaw's 'Buuhan Agenda' option like we've literally been saying all this time?
You'd literally fit within that view from what I'm seeing. If so, lets discuss it then.
Now, since we read statements in the manga differently I don't think I could ever "prove" my stance is correct to you;
We clearly aren't going to agree with each other no, but I don't particularly feel you are being very open minded either.
Goku's statement about acknowledging inferiority to Super Buy while inside Buu's body is evidence to me, but it's not evidence to you because you have a different interpretation of what Goku is saying.
I mean when I have a solid interpretation on top of actual statements, I have a pretty solid reason to do so.
If you could imagine that my interpretation of Goku's statement is correct, then could you at least see why I have so much of an issue with this proposal where Goku is seemingly worried about regular Super Buu but then has a completely even fight against someone who is supposed two power-ups higher than Buuhan? Even if you disagree with me, you can understand why this seems wrong to me?
I literally used to be a Buuhan supporter. So of course I know why you're saying the things you are. None of this is new to me whatsoever. I've gone over everything countless times. And I've found out that in order to ignore all these things, it's more so personal feeling than anything uniquely concrete in my opinion. But like you said, you'd be open to Kid Buu>Super Buu right? So we can continue with that as well.
 
I don't feel as though you are acting in good faith.
I'm sorry you feel that way. It's difficult for me to contribute much to a discussion with opponents that think that way about me. It makes me feel like I'm wasting my energy on it. But I did take the time to address the points in your OP; it comes across as disingenuous to me to claim that I'm just brushing it off when I did genuinely take the time to read through your points and respond to them. I didn't agree with the conclusion that you came to but it's not because I'm not debating in good faith.
 
I'm sorry you feel that way. It's difficult for me to contribute much to a discussion with opponents that think that way about me. It makes me feel like I'm wasting my energy on it.
I mean the same goes for me? I feel like I'm wasting my energy on a discussion with points that haven't been addressed in good faith. This happens literally all the time in any debate. But regardless. You said you could see Kid Buu>Super Buu, so why not vote that way? There's literally an option for it.
 
I mean the same goes for me? I feel like I'm wasting my energy on a discussion with points that haven't been addressed in good faith. This happens literally all the time in any debate. But regardless. You said you could see Kid Buu>Super Buu, so why not vote that way? There's literally an option for it.
I said I could possibly see it, not that I think it's the best option. So far I'm just voting for the option that I think is the best here. If I have to compromise later on then that's something I'm open-minded enough to do.
 
I said I could possibly see it, not that I think it's the best option. So far I'm just voting for the option that I think is the best here. If I have to compromise later on then that's something I'm open-minded enough to do.
If you acknowledge that your stance is flawed enough to acknowledge Kid Buu > Super Buu is a reasonable claim, even if not the best option, then shouldn't you change your vote to neutral, while at most saying you lean to disagreeing?
 
If you acknowledge that your stance is flawed enough to acknowledge Kid Buu > Super Buu is a reasonable claim, even if not the best option, then shouldn't you change your vote to neutral, while at most saying you lean to disagreeing?
No? Seeing other possibilities is not the same thing as not being confident in the option I've picked. Why wouldn't the same thing apply to Qaws who proposed the two different options yet is voting in favor of just one of them?
 
That 'form' is just Freeza going full power in his Final Form. Which Goku envisions Freeza as using. Notably the manga never depicts the 100% state anywhere. Even when Freeza has Frost go full power and exhaust his energy like in the anime. Which would indicate Toyotaro, for whatever reason, simply has zero interest in depicting that bulked up full power. Similarly Roshi never uses his full power 'form' in the manga either. He remains skinny the entire Tournament of Power. Even in the RoF flashback Roshi is skinny.

Point being, even when Toyotaro shows members of Freeza's race goes full power he doesn't bulk them up. And when he has Roshi going all out in fights he doesn't have him bulk up, even in a RoF flashback where he fought in only his bulked state. This is even when Toyotaro explicitly tells readers to watch the RoF movie to learn what happens. Granted, in the promotional manga for the RoF film he does at least show a bulked up Roshi there.

Regardless it can simply be explained as either:
1) Goku is taking his 're-run' seriously so he isn't allowing Freeza to go full power like before.​
2) Toyotaro simply doesn't depict Freeza's race as bulking up when using their full power. Could be preference. Could be something else. But he clearly has a preference against it when he consciously depicts Frost as not bulking up at full power, unlike the anime.​
EDIT: Additionally, an Interval Special breaking down forms in the manga continuity doesn't distinguish Full Power as a separate form from Final Form Freeza.
Guess I said "fair enough" too quickly then. Appreciate the assist
 
No? Seeing other possibilities is not the same thing as not being confident in the option I've picked. Why wouldn't the same thing apply to Qaws who proposed the two different options yet is voting in favor of just one of them?
Because Qawsed agrees, regardless, that Kid Buu > Super Buu is reasonable. He's just offering multiple options on how to interpret that claim. And I'm pretty sure he said he thinks Kid Buu > Buuhan is correct. You, on the other hand, are acknowledging two wildly different things. One being outright disagreement and the other end of the spectrum which is seeing how agreement is a reasonable interpretation.

And yes, seeing other possibilities kind of does bring your own vote into contention. If you acknowledge your position is so flawed you can't conclusively defend it and concretely claim it is correct then you are inherently acknowledging an outright disagreement is unreasonable. You are effectively saying you are being unreasonable.

So what is it? Do you have concrete argumentation for disagreeing? Or do you not? Why can you 'see the possibilities' if you think your own arguments hold up under scrutiny?
 
And yes, seeing other possibilities kind of does bring your own vote into contention. If you acknowledge your position is so flawed you can't conclusively defend it and concretely claim it is correct then you are inherently acknowledging an outright disagreement is unreasonable. You are effectively saying you are being unreasonable.

So what is it? Do you have concrete argumentation for disagreeing? Or do you not? Why can you 'see the possibilities' if you think your own arguments hold up under scrutiny?
If you want me to clarify, I'm keeping my vote as disagree. I don't want to cause confusion that me seeing other possibilities means I'm not confident in disagreeing, apologies for any misunderstanding.
 
If you want me to clarify, I'm keeping my vote as disagree. I don't want to cause confusion that me seeing other possibilities means I'm not confident in disagreeing, apologies for any misunderstanding.
I want to understand better. How are you seeing 'other possibilities' here? Why are you granting validity to the literal other side of the argument if you firmly believe you are correct? Explain.
 
I want to understand better. How are you seeing 'other possibilities' here? Why are you granting validity to the literal other side of the argument if you firmly believe you are correct? Explain.
No, I don't want to indulge this attempt at a "gotcha" where you're trying to catch me out and claim my vote isn't solid anymore. I've clarified my voting position now, that's all.
 
No? Seeing other possibilities is not the same thing as not being confident in the option I've picked. Why wouldn't the same thing apply to Qaws who proposed the two different options yet is voting in favor of just one of them?
I said that Kid Buu > Buuhan is reasonable given post manga statements. But the second one was saying that he's at least Kid Buu > Super Buu, but the preference is the first option I guess.
 
No, I don't want to indulge this attempt at a "gotcha" where you're trying to catch me out and claim my vote isn't solid anymore. I've clarified my voting position now, that's all.
This isn't a 'gotcha'. I want to understand how exactly you can outright disagree when you, yourself, are granting validity to the other side of the debate. Because, frankly, I don't understand your mentality whatsoever.
 
This isn't a 'gotcha'. I want to understand how exactly you can outright disagree when you, yourself, are granting validity to the other side of the debate. Because, frankly, I don't understand your mentality whatsoever.
Tilted was calling me out for seemingly not being open-minded before, not that I've tried to express being open-minded and acknowledge the possibility of options from the other side, I'm being told that I don't believe in the validity of my arguments anymore.

I'm sick and tired of this; I'm not going respond to you further on this. It may not be your intention, but it feels like you're just trying to get a rise out of me. If you don't understand me, then leave it at that.
 
Tilted was calling me out for seemingly not being open-minded before, not that I've tried to express being open-minded and acknowledge the possibility of options from the other side, I'm being told that I don't believe in the validity of my arguments anymore.

I'm sick and tired of this; I'm not going respond to you further on this. It may not be your intention, but it feels like you're just trying to get a rise out of me. If you don't understand me, then leave it at that.
Damage, you claimed you can see other possibilities as 'compromise' but refuse to change your vote to at least Neutral. By admitting there are other options that are valid to the original proposition, you are admitting that your argumentation isn't 100 percent concrete. Do you realize what that means? You are keeping yourself in an outright disagreement for a premise that you can see other options being valid.
 
Tilted was calling me out for seemingly not being open-minded before, not that I've tried to express being open-minded and acknowledge the possibility of options from the other side, I'm being told that I don't believe in the validity of my arguments anymore.

I'm sick and tired of this; I'm not going respond to you further on this. It may not be your intention, but it feels like you're just trying to get a rise out of me. If you don't understand me, then leave it at that.
Okay. Well I apologise for that. I myself have had a pretty unpleasant experience in this thread due to interactions with certain users.
 
Okay. Well I apologise for that. I myself have had a pretty unpleasant experience in this thread due to interactions with certain users.
Don't worry, I'm sure you weren't actually trying to antagonize me with your posts. I'm sorry if I made myself unclear in my earlier posts but I hate what other people try to put words in my mouth. I do disagree with the thread's current proposals. I'm not lacking in confidence in that disagreement enough to vote for a neutral position on it. I don't think that if a person is only 99.9% confident in their viewpoint that they be completely neutral on a topic.
 
After browsing the comments and the OP, I'm still frankly a bit skeptical of Kid Buu > Buuhan.

Kid Buu > Super Buu is fine, at the very, very least. statements back that up, and there is no inconsistency in sight towards it.

SSJ3 Goku >~ Ultimate Gohan and SSJ3 Gotenks is also fine, after all, we have ample evidence that Goku is just above Fat Buu and can compete with a Buu, who is stated to be stronger than Super Buu (Kid Buu)

  • Goku goes into the fight stalling for time and knowing his transformation will drain most of his remaining time, and he still wants to set up Earth to be capable of defending itself after he's gone (training Goten/Trunks and reviving Gohan with the Dragon Balls, as he still thinks he's dead)
  • And he admits to being capable of beating Fat Buu, as well as being able to beat Kid Buu at full power in SSJ3.

A statement that SSJ3 Goku fights with a power equal to Fat Buu doesn't really limit either of them from potentially being stronger, because a level of power equal to Fat Buu is simply what he demonstrated in that moment in his attempts to stall, and later, by his own admission, notes to being capable of outright beating him, giving us the notion that Goku has more than just an equal power like that statement implies.

(tbh I'd personally argue that the main cast doesn't really view Buuhan as a form of Buu in the traditional sense and just views him as Super Buu with stolen power (Like we already know that the Saiyans in particular reject stolen power and will often verbally seperate the antagonist from power they stole, not to mention absorbing someone like Gohan is something that Kid Buu, a more powerful version of Super Buu would also be capable of replicating and easily surpassing if he felt like it.)

For simplicity's sake, you can put me as neutral on the Kid Buu vs Buuhan point, but in full agreement with the logic for Kid Buu > Super Buu, and by extension, SSJ3 Goku > Ult Gohan and SSJ3 Gotenks.
 
Last edited:
I think both sides can more or less agree this has been debated to death. So I'd recommend just asking neutral staff if they might want to update their votes. And maybe call back people who voted earlier like DDM and Viet to see if their stance has remained the same.
 
The OP and thread are long. Can I ask you to post those statements here together? Those do seem to be the crux of this.
It seems you may have forgotten to get back to me. But I could have sworn I deferred you to infinite's points earlier.
But yeah basically. There's an overwhelming amount of evidence for Kid Buu being the strongest here, with Evil being directly attributed to Kid Buu's power. And obviously the author statements below. It seems you were under the impression earlier that you believe Kid Buu could be superior to Super Buu and by extension Goku.
Are you still Neutral after reading all this? I'd like to have your updated thoughts if you may. Since it seems you were leaning towards the Buuhan Agenda at the least here.
I mostly agree with Damage though I might want to mention that characters can get stronger when we least expect them due or Zenkai; or it is later revealed in Super Buu is another one of those characters similar to Beerus where then can just get mysteriously stronger for little to no reason. Goku in his SSJ2 form was evenly matched with Majin SSJ2 Vegeta back then, but it's possible the surprise punch that knocked out Goku prior to his fight with Fat Buu that he received a Zenkai from healing from Dende. Statements about Gotenks are also true, even before he got brutalized, his base form was at least as strong as Majin Vegeta, though training in RoSaT did power up to where in base he was stronger. It was also kind of overlooked that even before Gohan's transformation into Final/Ultimate Gohan, training with the Z Sword in hand made him grow significantly stronger. Goku also got a power up from training with it; still a stretch to even compare him to Final Gohan even with SSJ3, but there is indeed no full way to compare how much he grew compared to Gotenks.

But I ultimately do agree there is no proof of Kid Buu being the strongest Buu in combat PL as opposed to canon statements merely describing him as "More dangerous."
Can I also get your updated thoughts? A lot has been discussed so far. I am interested in your take of Kid Buu having "no proof" of being the strongest so I'd like to discuss that with you if you want. And we also have the "Buuhan Agenda" option that Qaw posted if that fits more within your views after reading some of the statements and arguments.
do you disagree with the Shonen Jump 50th Anniversary that explicitly calls the manga version of Kid Buu, the one that destroyed Earth, the strongest Majin?
Do you disagree with Toriyama not contradicting the claim that the smallest form, in this case Majin Buu, is the strongest?
Do you disagree with Toriyama saying that each side keeps transforming and getting more and more powerful until the Genkidama?
Do you disagree with Toriyama’s view that if a new version of a villain appears weaker, the reader would not be satisfied?
Do you also disagree with the official anime stating multiple times that Kid Buu is the strongest? (I know the anime is not canon to the manga, but it is still an official medium, and it supports my interpretation)

Additionally, the author in charge officially of DB Kai explicitly stated that they stayed faithful to the manga, this is not the DBZ anime, is a remake made faithful to the manga, these are people that fully understand and can read the japanese version of the manga, yet even in DB Kai, Kid Buu is stated to be the strongest. Again, the DB Kai version cut a plethora of anime-only moments and exaggerations, yet they still kept this. So do you think we can interpret the japanese manga better than them?

I am going to ask you the opposite question: what even supports, with the same amount of evidence, that Buuhan is the strongest?

Basically, every official medium says otherwise, every official Dragon Ball medium support our interpretation of the manga. It is kind of hard to ignore all of this and just say there is no proof of Kid Buu being the strongest. And it is also kind of superficial dismiss everything with 1) not canon or 2) "anime only" as if, they are not official interpretation of the source material? (Sill lot of proof strictly manga wise were presented as well in the whole OP).

Gotenks's Stuff:

Also, another small correction: Gotenks is not really that strong. Toriyama himself support that. A rusty after Buu-saga SSJ Goku, in a manga drawn by Toriyama, outclassed Super Saiyan Gotenks. This is a manga drawn by Toriyama himself.
Vegeta explicitly says in DBS that Goku was the strongest after defeating Buu, not in BOG, but after defeating Buu he was already. Toriyama’s portrayal suggests that end-of-Buu-saga Goku is the strongest, as he himself said: Goku is always the strongest.

Vegeta states Goku is the number 1, and it refers to power, the anime also clarify this by saying Goku is simply the strongest. Once again, every external medium support this interpretation.

There is so many proof... Toriyama wrote Dragon Ball Daima and again, confirmed Goku is the strongest.This is Goku right after the Buu Saga.

This is confirmed in the Daizenshuu as well. In this picture, the image is computer-made, but in the original magazine the descriptions refer to the whole character, SSJ3 included. Just because you see base Gotenks here does not mean the description refers only to him in that form; it refers to Gotenks as a whole. In fact, there is no separate description for Gotenks’ other forms, and this description clearly says that Gotenks has only surpassed Vegeta and the others.
But wait, if he were massively above Goku, then why even say “Vegeta and the others”? Vegeta is not even the main character, neither Vegeta is stronger than Goku. It is clear that nowhere is it stated that Gotenks surpassed Goku. Actually, the statement that he surpassed “Vegeta and the others” strongly implies that he did not surpass Goku whatsoever. If that was the case, it would have been stated, "he has surpassed Goku and the others"
 

Here I put more evidences as well, for the neutral staff @Nierre @Random-Helper323

I want to point out a thing.

Buhan is just Super Buu + Gohan, with Super Buu being noticeably weaker than Gohan. So Buhan should be less than twice as powerful than Gohan.

so Buhan < x2 Gohan, under this lense, he is not that god-like aymore, he's just very powerful.

And we know that:

Kid Buu > Goku > Gohan.

This is Super Buu, and then he undergoes a metamorphosis to become Kid Buu.

His ki rises because removing the absorptions eliminates the good souls and what was holding him back, and he becomes stronger.

We also know Kid Buu is above the initial Super Genki-Dama which is powered by KI, since Goku concedes that even with Gohan’s ki, it still would not be enough to defeat Buu.

So what I’m asking is: is it really unreasonable to think he got more than a boost? I don’t think so. In Dragon Ball, even charging ki for long enough can double or triple it.

Maybe that sounds unreasonable to some people, but what if basically every other source, interviews and official media, keeps telling us Kid Buu is the strongest? Are the people in charge of the anime and the brand official products overall illiterate?

There is a massive preponderance of external evidence pointing to that narrative.

I know the anime exaggerates feats and scaling gaps, but the anime’s producers have no reason to mislead us about the lore. They even made a remake that was meant to be faithful to the manga, and they still kept that portrayal. They have absolutely no reason to make things up.

And please, guys, don’t strawman me by saying “the anime has different wiki profiles.” Of course it does, if someone destroys a galaxy instead of a planet, then naturally they’re rated higher. But that has nothing to do with the narrative preponderance of evidence I’m talking about. I'm talking about Japanese people reading the manga and adapting to the anime, official products recognised by the brands etc. We can't just dismiss those.
 
The evidence presented by OP is pretty gigantic. While the opposition did made some good points here and there, i'm inclined towards agreeing with the Kid Boo agenda. The philosophy of how Toriyama writes his manga has been in his work since DB Classic, so it wouldn't make any sense for it to disappear during the final battle. Unless i see an equally convincing post proving the opposite, i agree with the thread.
 
What I’m seeing is contradiction between the OP and opposing databook. We got some saying the fused buu’s being the strongest while the other saying Kid Buu is

So which one do we even use
 
These scans are ass.

Half of it was Vegeta just saying "yeah Goku you're the best". He wasn't even alive to see Ultimate Gohan and Gotenks.
Him not holding back is just headcanon.
Strongest warrior is just bad hype.
"The always pure strongest in the universe" There were many periods in time where he wasn't the strongest warrior in the universe, including Cell Saga where he was never the number one.
Getting a scan directly talking about the genkidama that says "Is Goku the strongest" then saying "it's not talking about the genkidama" is horrible
"Goku's feelings are only understood by his fellow strongest" what????
"But is the most powerful warrior who possesses unworldly strength" regarding while he's fighting someone stronger than him

These are TERRIBLE
For Kid Buu, it can be:

Having his Kaioshins’s absorptions being undone, he grow up in power. He has been stated several times by the author and Guidebooks to the be strongest Majin, meaning he is stronger than his previous forms, shown superiority over Goku, and could halt the Super Genkidama, the last hope of the universe with immeasurable force, before Goku needed to turn into a Super Saiyan and his energy restored on top.”
This first one is still a conversation to be had but whatever
Some of the scans you used didn't even say strongest majin, it jusst says that the villain is stronger than the previous villain
You sent a scan with Buu, Cell, Frieza, and Vegeta. That isn't talking about forms that's talking about cliffing other villains
Then you sent something about "shown superiority over Goku" but in Goku's you talk about how he would wipe Buu out if he charged his Ki


Like what
 
These scans are ass.

Half of it was Vegeta just saying "yeah Goku you're the best". He wasn't even alive to see Ultimate Gohan and Gotenks.
i dont think him being alive here matters when ssj3 was revealed after he died and he watched goku turn ssj3 which is a big reason why he didnt want to fuse
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top