- 1,303
- 594
I am thinking of opening a topic or discussing this topic with employees about this. The very old evidence that the author of the Instant Death work answered is that Yugiri's true form transcends the concept of dimensions. This evidence is old and was used to promote him here previously to higher levels, but it was abandoned and ignored for a reason that I do not know.
The author answered the question with the intention of understanding the nature of his true form, and his answer was long and authoritative and explained a lot and was not a silly answer like “yes.” Only if the author had answered yes, he might accept that such an answer would appear to be an emotional or unconvincing answer and would be viewed negatively by many members, but in our case now the author answered the question in 3 lines with an explanation as well, which is why I personally think that ignoring this matter is not logical and seems like a bias against him. Literally, especially since the author also made many statements saying that Yugiri's character can defeat any character in the anime world, regardless of who he is.... The author always shows Yugiri as a strong character and always the strongest in all of fiction, and for this reason his response is not an emotion or a silly response, and far from all of this, the response was in two to three lines, and for this reason I at least want the employees to at least discuss the response and verify it themselves with everything that was mentioned, and the decision remains with them if the response is logical, and it must also be verified, looked at, scrutinized, and put in place. Precise criteria for which authors' answers can be approved and which can be rejected
This is the speech ↓
Look at the size of the answer! Is there really someone who ignores a 3-line answer from the author? His answer also contributes to understanding Yugiri's true nature and the extent of her actual power. Frankly, I am truly surprised that there are those who truly deny evidence of this magnitude.
The author answered the question with the intention of understanding the nature of his true form, and his answer was long and authoritative and explained a lot and was not a silly answer like “yes.” Only if the author had answered yes, he might accept that such an answer would appear to be an emotional or unconvincing answer and would be viewed negatively by many members, but in our case now the author answered the question in 3 lines with an explanation as well, which is why I personally think that ignoring this matter is not logical and seems like a bias against him. Literally, especially since the author also made many statements saying that Yugiri's character can defeat any character in the anime world, regardless of who he is.... The author always shows Yugiri as a strong character and always the strongest in all of fiction, and for this reason his response is not an emotion or a silly response, and far from all of this, the response was in two to three lines, and for this reason I at least want the employees to at least discuss the response and verify it themselves with everything that was mentioned, and the decision remains with them if the response is logical, and it must also be verified, looked at, scrutinized, and put in place. Precise criteria for which authors' answers can be approved and which can be rejected
This is the speech ↓