• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

An important question concerns an important clue in the work of instant death

Messages
1,303
Reaction score
594
I am thinking of opening a topic or discussing this topic with employees about this. The very old evidence that the author of the Instant Death work answered is that Yugiri's true form transcends the concept of dimensions. This evidence is old and was used to promote him here previously to higher levels, but it was abandoned and ignored for a reason that I do not know.

The author answered the question with the intention of understanding the nature of his true form, and his answer was long and authoritative and explained a lot and was not a silly answer like “yes.” Only if the author had answered yes, he might accept that such an answer would appear to be an emotional or unconvincing answer and would be viewed negatively by many members, but in our case now the author answered the question in 3 lines with an explanation as well, which is why I personally think that ignoring this matter is not logical and seems like a bias against him. Literally, especially since the author also made many statements saying that Yugiri's character can defeat any character in the anime world, regardless of who he is.... The author always shows Yugiri as a strong character and always the strongest in all of fiction, and for this reason his response is not an emotion or a silly response, and far from all of this, the response was in two to three lines, and for this reason I at least want the employees to at least discuss the response and verify it themselves with everything that was mentioned, and the decision remains with them if the response is logical, and it must also be verified, looked at, scrutinized, and put in place. Precise criteria for which authors' answers can be approved and which can be rejected

This is the speech ↓

Screenshot-2026-03-08-20-22-20-29-99c04817c0de5652397fc8b56c3b3817.jpg
Look at the size of the answer! Is there really someone who ignores a 3-line answer from the author? His answer also contributes to understanding Yugiri's true nature and the extent of her actual power. Frankly, I am truly surprised that there are those who truly deny evidence of this magnitude.
 
Leading questions are not allowed. Questions that are framed with the intention of battleboarding or steering the discussion toward a specific outcome cannot be used.
Can you focus on the question and the answer? I think the author’s answer is not a silly answer like yes or no. Rather, he explained the matter in 3 lines. Likewise, you can review the answer and the question as well, because it is not a question aimed at increasing the level of strength, but rather a question related to the nature of Yugiri’s true form.
 
The reason is quite simple

Due to a very strange choice of words and topic for a normal question to the author, the question was deemed to be a loaded/powerscaling-inspired question which are considered void by the rules of the wiki
Not like that. This question aims to understand Yugiri’s true nature. His nature is what makes him transcend concepts and everything because he is the end and the dead end after which there is nothing, as mentioned in the novel. That is why this question was also asked because of his nature, which is the end and after which there is nothing. This question contributes to understanding his nature more and is not a question related to the level of power or aimed at those things. You can review the person’s question carefully.
 
Can you focus on the question and the answer? I think the author’s answer is not a silly answer like yes or no. Rather, he explained the matter in 3 lines. Likewise, you can review the answer and the question as well, because it is not a question aimed at increasing the level of strength, but rather a question related to the nature of Yugiri’s true form.
Even when using a WOG statement, we still need strong supporting evidence from the source material to justify it. If that evidence isn’t present, then we can’t use it. In this case, the question is far more leading than a typical one. Also, as far as I know, this specific question was discontinued for use in upgrades.
 
Not like that. This question aims to understand Yugiri’s true nature. His nature is what makes him transcend concepts and everything because he is the end and the dead end after which there is nothing, as mentioned in the novel. That is why this question was also asked because of his nature, which is the end and after which there is nothing. This question contributes to understanding his nature more and is not a question related to the level of power or aimed at those things. You can review the person’s question carefully.
I have reviewed the question carefully and came to a certain conclusion

The use of phrases "beyond the concept of dimensions" "no matter how many are stacked" is wildly uncharacteristic for any person out there who isn't a powerscaler. These terms are simply too unpopular for that
There exist much more natural phrasings of asking for clarification on the nature of the character than this. It's too specific to be completely unrelated to powerscaling

We do sometimes ban WoG for even less than that
 
Even when using a WOG statement, we still need strong supporting evidence from the source material to justify it. If that evidence isn’t present, then we can’t use it. In this case, the question is far more leading than a typical one. Also, as far as I know, this specific question was discontinued for use in upgrades.
Well, if this is your opinion, then I will wait for the opinion of the rest of the employees, and even now you continue to ignore that the question was not aimed at increasing strength in the way you think, but rather the person who asked the question was aiming to understand the nature of his true form, which transcends everything and can never be reached, and this is a question that contributes to knowing his true form more, and the author answered clearly in 3 lines and made the matter clear, and the author’s words are the same as the author’s words in the novel, so they are the same person, so it is strange that you ask for evidence from the novel as well, and the problem is that the author is the same one who answered and who wrote the novel. He knew about it, and the problem was related to the question and not the answer, because the question did not aim to increase power, but rather aimed to understand the nature of his true form, which can never be reached even by the concept of dimensions itself. Therefore, if you continue to ignore this matter and say that it is a question aimed at increasing power, then you are only denying the question and what is written in it.

If you want evidence for this matter, I can give the evidence that exists about its true form in the novel (it is the end and the dead end after which there is nothing at all, and is there anything after the end? Nothing goes beyond the end. The end is the last thing that can be reached and there is nothing after it. Therefore, regardless of the thing, it does not go beyond the end, so no concept, whatever it may be, can go beyond the end. Because saying that a concept has gone beyond the end means that this concept is indestructible, not subject to influence, and not subject to any Something and this thing is not true, that all concepts have an end, even the concept of dimensions and all possible concepts, and nothing of any world, regardless of it, can exceed the end. Everything that can be destroyed and ends has an end, and for this reason, regardless of the number of dimensions and the whole concept of dimensions, it will not reach it because no matter how many dimensions there are, whether infinite or so on, they are subject to the end.
 
I think in case the answers are detailed and the author knowingly answers the question instead of just giving a pure 'yes' or 'no', we do allow the answers to be used as supporting evidence to some extent, or just as 'likely' or 'possibly'. Just because the one who asked the question is a powerscaler doesn't necessarily discredit the answer, it can be case by case. But different staff members have different opinions regarding such matters, so whatever ig.
 
I think in case the answers are detailed and the author knowingly answers the question instead of just giving a pure 'yes' or 'no', we do allow the answers to be used as supporting evidence to some extent, or just as 'likely' or 'possibly'. Just because the one who asked the question is a powerscaler doesn't necessarily discredit the answer, it can be case by case. But different staff members have different opinions regarding such matters, so whatever ig.
Yes, I agree with you. The author's answer here is not a simple yes-or-no answer; rather, it is a five-line response and a clear one, where he even clarified the matter. He also speaks with confidence, and you can see the clear and precise answer in his words.
 
Also, by the way, wanted to point it out: the author doesn't even say that Yogiri's True Form is beyond dimensions. He says that his abilities would be able to bypass it if it existed
His true form is the end, beyond which nothing exists. It is the dead end, and the only thing that will remain in the end, because it is the end.
Takato Yogiri is nothing more than an avatar of his true form, and his true form cannot be surpassed by anyone, nor can anyone even hope to surpass it, because it is the end and there is nothing beyond it.
Therefore, I disagree with you, and please do not interpret things from your personal perspective and speak about them as if they were facts.
 
His true form is the end, beyond which nothing exists. It is the dead end, and the only thing that will remain in the end, because it is the end.
Takato Yogiri is nothing more than an avatar of his true form, and his true form cannot be surpassed by anyone, nor can anyone even hope to surpass it, because it is the end and there is nothing beyond it.
Therefore, I disagree with you, and please do not interpret things from your personal perspective and speak about them as if they were facts.
I'm literally almost quoting you the response of the author

I recommend requesting the translation of this text in the Official Translation Request Thread before continuing this discussion
 
Back
Top