- 12,767
- 15,291
The near-lightspeed range isn't arbitrary in the way you're all framing it. This is a standard that has been in use for years, and it was accepted by staff when this calc was evaluated and approved, at that point it became accepted methodology, not an ongoing community debate. Retroactively challenging a standard that has been established for years and was used in an already accepted calc is a separate discussion, not an argument against the calc itself. Not everything has to be a written rule somewhere in the wiki, as we've had some standards that were just common knowledge among people who make calculations.
And the range is physically grounded anyway. Dabura is explicitly established to have reached the speed of light, meaning he passed through every velocity below it. We aren't pulling 75% and 93% out of nowhere. 75% represents a conservative lower bound for what 'near lightspeed' reasonably means, and 93% is the site's accepted ceiling for KE purposes. The uncertainty isn't in whether he hit those speeds, it's just in where exactly within that range he was during the run. That's a far cry from arbitrary.
I'm done for now. I agree with KE and the speeds choosen, since I obviously accepted the calculation in the first place.
And the range is physically grounded anyway. Dabura is explicitly established to have reached the speed of light, meaning he passed through every velocity below it. We aren't pulling 75% and 93% out of nowhere. 75% represents a conservative lower bound for what 'near lightspeed' reasonably means, and 93% is the site's accepted ceiling for KE purposes. The uncertainty isn't in whether he hit those speeds, it's just in where exactly within that range he was during the run. That's a far cry from arbitrary.
I'm done for now. I agree with KE and the speeds choosen, since I obviously accepted the calculation in the first place.