• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Tokyo Revengers: Removing Anime Feats

Status
Not open for further replies.
How reliable is the information on this website? It’s a fan-made site; it would be good if they stated where the information comes from.
Wakui supervises all of his shi, he supervised the spinoff mangas, his games, and even the movies. ur assuming he's not gonna supervise the most important part to a manga.

The anime is faithful
sources state its supervised and some state its closely supervised
liden films stays faithful to every manga they animate

Theres more sources from the producers saying wakui wanted and knew his anime would be adapted. Implying he was involved in its adaptation
 
Wakui supervises all of his shi, he supervised the spinoff mangas, his games, and even the movies. ur assuming he's not gonna supervise the most important part to a manga.
The rules regarding the canon material state this. You can find them in the pinned thread here, but you’ve already been told and shown this several times.

 
How many times will u be shown evidence and ignore it, mate
Could you ping the message where you provided Wakui’s direct statement? Because the current rules require this, even if the OP didn’t present it properly, that doesn’t change the rules.
 
Wakui supervises all of his shi, he supervised the spinoff mangas, his games, and even the movies. ur assuming he's not gonna supervise the most important part to a manga.

The anime is faithful
sources state its supervised and some state its closely supervised
liden films stays faithful to every manga they animate
The only place that claims he supervised the anime is a fan site that does not provide the source of this information. I don’t see this as valid, especially since the official anime website lists him only as the original creator of the work, and not as the director (who oversees the entire production) or as responsible for the Series Composition or the script.

Do you have any verifiable citation that confirms the accuracy of the claim that he supervised Tokyo Revengers games?
 
The only place that claims he supervised the anime is a fan site that does not provide the source of this information.
false, theres several more, i've discussed before

jst say u cant accept the verse having a canon anime when theres 10 different things pointing to it
I don’t see this as valid, especially since the official anime website lists him only as the original creator of the work, and not as the director (who oversees the entire production) or as responsible for the Series Composition or the script.
when the official website doesn't put you as one of the directors but also dont put you as the character designer when its ur character designs that you've coloured before too
Do you have any verifiable citation that confirms the accuracy of the claim that he supervised Tokyo Revengers games?
theres like several more
 
Could you ping the message where you provided Wakui’s direct statement? Because the current rules require this, even if the OP didn’t present it properly, that doesn’t change the rules.
if u didn't read my replies why are you responding to them
 
false, theres several more, i've discussed before
The site you shared does not state that he supervised the anime; it only mentions that the manga was inspired by ERASED and Re:Zero, and highlights the author’s wish for his work to be adapted into an anime (which is something most mangaka aspire to).
when the official website doesn't put you as one of the directors but also dont put you as the character designer when its ur character designs that you've coloured before too
The character designer is the one who adapts the manga characters to the animation style. Therefore, there is no reason for their name to be listed under character designer.
 
The site you shared does not state that he supervised the anime; it only mentions that the manga was inspired by ERASED and Re:Zero, and highlights the author’s wish for his work to be adapted into an anime (which is something most mangaka aspire to).
thats not the only one, theres several more, pls dive into it more

in total about 2 sites directly stating it, with one implying it really heavily
The character designer is the one who adapts the manga characters to the animation style. Therefore, there is no reason for their name to be listed under character designer.
thats not what character design is defined as
 
theres like several more
This one specifically notes the game is set in a different world line from the anime
Furthermore, it also includes the Shibuya Inferno arc, a long-form, fully newly written another story supervised by the original author, Ken Wakui.
A story set in a different world line from the TV anime unfolds.
So like this doesn't help with anything anime related
And again mere supervision doesn't mean anything with the new canon guidelines

As DemonLord pointed out the other sites you linked are fan sites that don't cite a source

Edit: An author wanting to see their series get an adaptation also doesn't mean anything about canonicity
 
Jst say u aint read the manga,
it aint its in the manga, jst say u aint read it
I'll tell you now to refrain from this behavior, you're all free to tackle specific aspects of arguments but making claims like this because people don't agree with you or for any other reason isn't acceptable.
he whole fight is in the manga the anime jst shows the exact punches and kicks + it's supervised + it's faithful to the manga.
Its in the OP and its very evidently very much different, this isn't a real argument
the manga and anime is only different by the anime showing the exact punches of a fight in the manga.
Untrue, the actual bit being calculated literally does not exist in any capacity in the original work.
Also mate did u just say Baji is comp to no names when he is literally beating 50 of them in the same scene without being tagged once...
This is irrelevant to the calcs at hand.
Not only is Wakui supervising the anime, the anime is faithful.

Oh and BTW, wakui dont jst supervise it, he closely ensures everything is correct:https://anibase.net/en/anime/4kJn1/Tokyo-Revengers-Season-2
This isn't enough evidence to say the anime is the primary canon by our standards?
Synchronize says it best here
 
Its in the OP and its very evidently very much different, this isn't a real argument
no it aint, u saying it aint a real argument dont make it an argument. the WHOLE FIGHT IS IN THE MANGA, the anime expands on it, stop tryna lie
Untrue, the actual bit being calculated literally does not exist in any capacity in the original work.
untrue, the fight exists the anime shows the fight, and even the part of him doing the feat just in more detail
This is irrelevant to the calcs at hand.
u claimed hes comp to no names LOL
This isn't enough evidence to say the anime is the primary canon by our standards?

Synchronise says it best here
LOL, i gave you several sources, several indicators, jst say u aint wanna accept it cause i gave u so much evidence, dont lie
 
LOL, i gave you several sources, several indicators, jst say u aint wanna accept it cause i gave u so much evidence, dont lie
Here's a source that's fine to accept: Ken Wakui directly stating in an interview that the anime is his true vision of the work, or other flowery stuff like that.

And no, I don't need some wiki, I need a direct interview with the man.
 
Here's a source that's fine to accept: Ken Wakui directly stating in an interview that the anime is his true vision of the work, or other flowery stuff like that.

And no, I don't need some wiki, I need a direct interview with the man.
the wiki is a translation of his interviews...

it's hard to find translated interviews and u have to rely on wikis, dk whats confusing abt that

1 source saying he supervised it
1 source saying he directly supervised it heavily
1 source implying he supervised it heavily

and many more.

along with that the anime is faithful to a tea, and liden films is always faithful with they adaptations

so u've been given enough proof
 
@LostLightt So, no, it's not sufficient. Supervising is not a show of canonicity. "Faithful" is not a show of canonicity. Attack on Titan went through hell to get it's anime as canon and it literally has what's needed for anime being primary canon.

Look on the bright side though mate, you have an excuse to just make anime profiles for Tokyo Revengers.
 
@LostLightt So, no, it's not sufficient. Supervising is not a show of canonicity. "Faithful" is not a show of canonicity. Attack on Titan went through hell to get it's anime as canon and it literally has what's needed for anime being primary canon.

Look on the bright side though mate, you have an excuse to just make anime profiles for Tokyo Revengers.
its okay to admit ur wrong, but its not okay to ignore evidence

3 sources state its supervised with one saying it's CLOSELY SUPERVISED

its faithful to a tee

liden films is consistently producing faithful animations

I'm not saying one thing here proves it, i'm saying according to the page on vsbw, all ts combined is valid.

Sorry bud
 
its okay to admit ur wrong, but its not okay to ignore evidence

3 sources state its supervised with one saying it's CLOSELY SUPERVISED

its faithful to a tee

liden films is consistently producing faithful animations

I'm not saying one thing here proves it, i'm saying according to the page on vsbw, all ts combined is valid.

Sorry bud
Let me just...
its okay to admit ur wrong
For an actual explanantion: Evidence that does not align with wiki standard is not evidence. This will be the case forever.
 
Let me just...

For an actual explanantion: Evidence that does not align with wiki standard is not evidence. This will be the case forever.
idk how ur gonna argue against evidence saying he directly heavily supervised the anime.

he even supervised the chibi anime: https://baike.baidu.com/en/item/Tokyo Revengers/1559713

I am still in agreement with Dale here.
so ur just gonna ignore the 3 sources, several faithfulness, ect?

dude who made the rule implied my shi would be valid


tr is adapted word for word
 
idk how ur gonna argue against evidence saying he directly heavily supervised the anime.
...

You have been told
By multiple staff
And normal users
That supervising the anime
Is not canonicity proof
By our standards.

If that's a problem, make a site wide CRT.
so ur just gonna ignore the 3 sources, several faithfulness, ect?

dude who made the rule implied my shi would be valid


tr is adapted word for word
except it's not, it ADDS scenes. Canonicity word for word is not just "oh everything happens", word for word is "Everything is the same as the Manga just animated".

If it is an addition to an existing fight, then it ceases being word for word. An extra shot? Not word for word. An extra part of a fight? Not word for word.

"Go to hell" and "Go to hell dickwad" is not word for word, ya can't have anything going against it, espeically not consistently and ESPEICALLY not when the additions are what's getting calced.
 
...

You have been told
By multiple staff
And normal users
That supervising the anime
Is not canonicity proof
By our standards.

If that's a problem, make a site wide CRT.

except it's not, it ADDS scenes. Canonicity word for word is not just "oh everything happens", word for word is "Everything is the same as the Manga just animated".

If it is an addition to an existing fight, then it ceases being word for word. An extra shot? Not word for word. An extra part of a fight? Not word for word.

"Go to hell" and "Go to hell dickwad" is not word for word, ya can't have anything going against it, espeically not consistently and ESPEICALLY not when the additions are what's getting calced.
cote literally does the same thing, they add scenes change words but it's still accepted

and i neva said supervsing the anime is canonicity proof

i said EVERYTHING COMBNIED is proof, and its' hard for u to deny it on any grounds

which ur doin
 
cote literally does the same thing, they add scenes change words but it's still accepted
Then get it unaccepted with scans and evidence showing that. I am an equal opportunity hater, and two wrongs don't make a right.
and i neva said supervsing the anime is canonicity proof

i said EVERYTHING COMBNIED is proof, and its' hard for u to deny it on any grounds
If 80% of the stuff is dogshit and 20% is bland pasta, all you're gonna be tasting is dogshit. And the pasta really isn't standing on it's own.

My final answer is agreeing with this thread and thus disagreeing with you. I have no interest in dealing with stonewalling based off of misconceptions.
 
If 80% of the stuff is dogshit and 20% is bland pasta, all you're gonna be tasting is dogshit. And the pasta really isn't standing on it's own.

My final answer is agreeing with this thread and thus disagreeing with you. I have no interest in dealing with stonewalling based off of misconceptions.
ur the one stonewalling

theres no evidence contradicting the canon thats reinforce heavily by several sources
 
Reaper, don't reply to him
You already know he's stonewalling, it's just gonna clog up the thread
 
Reaper, don't reply to him
You already know he's stonewalling, it's just gonna clog up the thread
Yeah yeah, but one more for the road
whats so hard bout agreeing with an analogy thats obv soundproof
I fixed that for ya.

Jokes aside, if it was "obv sound", you wouldn't be 0-2 on evaluation staff who agree with you vs disagree. Like I said, final answer, so...
eh-i%27m-out-of-here-mandy.gif
 
Yeah yeah, but one more for the road

I fixed that for ya.

Jokes aside, if it was "obv sound", you wouldn't be 0-2 on evaluation staff who agree with you vs disagree. Like I said, final answer, so...
eh-i%27m-out-of-here-mandy.gif
i'll accept ur final answer with great sadness and pain
 
dude who made the rule implied my shi would be valid
If it was adapted word for word and it's extra viewing of the same feat then it should be fine
I don't think anyone's here opposing use of anime for feats from manga but with better visualization of feat, use of timeframe, etc. The fact that anime adapts 1:1 for everything else that's shown in manga just lets you to use anime version for them, that's not gonna work for additional scenes.
 
Most of the calcs are jank on the fact that they either use outdated values (Like glass destruction, we don't use glass destruction values at all anymore because they don't conform with our simplified standards for destruction values in general, couple that with the fact that junkyard cars might have the windshield be in deteriorating condition) or use methods that are a huge no-no against standards (Like smacking someone with a bat and sending them flying at high speeds and trying to derive LS from that).

Even the speed feats could possibly be inflated based on bad visuals or gross violations of our slow-mo rules.

The human throwing feats are also kinda sketch, as we have rules against using throwing feats for normal-weight people (Gotta be at least the weight of a motorbike or heavier to qualify now).

The explosion calc is also egregiously wrong, the car's bodywork is more or less untouched - this is just deflagration of gasoline inside the car (Which I don't have to tell you, is UNUSABLE).

The feats obviously not being 1:1 to the manga is a huge factor, but the above problems I believe are far, far bigger issues than us using tertiary canon.
 
Most of the calcs are jank on the fact that they either use outdated values (Like glass destruction, we don't use glass destruction values at all anymore because they don't conform with our simplified standards for destruction values in general, couple that with the fact that junkyard cars might have the windshield be in deteriorating condition) or use methods that are a huge no-no against standards (Like smacking someone with a bat and sending them flying at high speeds and trying to derive LS from that).

Even the speed feats could possibly be inflated based on bad visuals or gross violations of our slow-mo rules.

The human throwing feats are also kinda sketch, as we have rules against using throwing feats for normal-weight people (Gotta be at least the weight of a motorbike or heavier to qualify now).

The explosion calc is also egregiously wrong, the car's bodywork is more or less untouched - this is just deflagration of gasoline inside the car (Which I don't have to tell you, is UNUSABLE).

The feats obviously not being 1:1 to the manga is a huge factor, but the above problems I believe are far, far bigger issues than us using tertiary canon.
nc debunks, you stated not a single math issue, other than the explosion calc
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top