- 345
- 11
prove it instead of ya claimsEven if the anime were legit I have half a mind to reject some of these calcs on the account of them being highly sketch AF.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
prove it instead of ya claimsEven if the anime were legit I have half a mind to reject some of these calcs on the account of them being highly sketch AF.
How reliable is the information on this website? It’s a fan-made site; it would be good if they stated where the information comes from.Oh and BTW, wakui dont jst supervise it, he closely ensures everything is correct:https://anibase.net/en/anime/4kJn1/Tokyo-Revengers-Season-2
Wakui supervises all of his shi, he supervised the spinoff mangas, his games, and even the movies. ur assuming he's not gonna supervise the most important part to a manga.How reliable is the information on this website? It’s a fan-made site; it would be good if they stated where the information comes from.
The rules regarding the canon material state this. You can find them in the pinned thread here, but you’ve already been told and shown this several times.Wakui supervises all of his shi, he supervised the spinoff mangas, his games, and even the movies. ur assuming he's not gonna supervise the most important part to a manga.
Such material is considered part of the primary continuity only when the creator or rights holders explicitly confirm its integration into, or priority over, the original timelin for instance, through statements verifying that specific events, scenes, or elements genuinely occur within it.
A faithful adaptation or the creator’s participation alone does not make new material canonical
How many times will u be shown evidence and ignore it, mateThe rules regarding the canon material state this. You can find them in the pinned thread here, but you’ve already been told and shown this several times.
Could you ping the message where you provided Wakui’s direct statement? Because the current rules require this, even if the OP didn’t present it properly, that doesn’t change the rules.How many times will u be shown evidence and ignore it, mate
The only place that claims he supervised the anime is a fan site that does not provide the source of this information. I don’t see this as valid, especially since the official anime website lists him only as the original creator of the work, and not as the director (who oversees the entire production) or as responsible for the Series Composition or the script.Wakui supervises all of his shi, he supervised the spinoff mangas, his games, and even the movies. ur assuming he's not gonna supervise the most important part to a manga.
The anime is faithful
sources state its supervised and some state its closely supervised
liden films stays faithful to every manga they animate
false, theres several more, i've discussed beforeThe only place that claims he supervised the anime is a fan site that does not provide the source of this information.
when the official website doesn't put you as one of the directors but also dont put you as the character designer when its ur character designs that you've coloured before tooI don’t see this as valid, especially since the official anime website lists him only as the original creator of the work, and not as the director (who oversees the entire production) or as responsible for the Series Composition or the script.
theres like several moreDo you have any verifiable citation that confirms the accuracy of the claim that he supervised Tokyo Revengers games?
if u didn't read my replies why are you responding to themCould you ping the message where you provided Wakui’s direct statement? Because the current rules require this, even if the OP didn’t present it properly, that doesn’t change the rules.
The site you shared does not state that he supervised the anime; it only mentions that the manga was inspired by ERASED and Re:Zero, and highlights the author’s wish for his work to be adapted into an anime (which is something most mangaka aspire to).false, theres several more, i've discussed before
The character designer is the one who adapts the manga characters to the animation style. Therefore, there is no reason for their name to be listed under character designer.when the official website doesn't put you as one of the directors but also dont put you as the character designer when its ur character designs that you've coloured before too
thats not the only one, theres several more, pls dive into it moreThe site you shared does not state that he supervised the anime; it only mentions that the manga was inspired by ERASED and Re:Zero, and highlights the author’s wish for his work to be adapted into an anime (which is something most mangaka aspire to).
thats not what character design is defined asThe character designer is the one who adapts the manga characters to the animation style. Therefore, there is no reason for their name to be listed under character designer.
This one specifically notes the game is set in a different world line from the animetheres like several more
![]()
Brand New Smartphone Game Tokyo Revengers UNLIMITED Officially Launches! Includes a Fully Newly Written Long-Form Story - Saiga NAK
Good Smile Company, Inc. has officially launched the smartphone game Tokyo Revengers UNLIMITED, developed and operated by f4samurai, Inc., for iOS and Android devices.saiganak.com
So like this doesn't help with anything anime relatedFurthermore, it also includes the Shibuya Inferno arc, a long-form, fully newly written another story supervised by the original author, Ken Wakui.
A story set in a different world line from the TV anime unfolds.
Jst say u aint read the manga,
I'll tell you now to refrain from this behavior, you're all free to tackle specific aspects of arguments but making claims like this because people don't agree with you or for any other reason isn't acceptable.it aint its in the manga, jst say u aint read it
Its in the OP and its very evidently very much different, this isn't a real argumenthe whole fight is in the manga the anime jst shows the exact punches and kicks + it's supervised + it's faithful to the manga.
Untrue, the actual bit being calculated literally does not exist in any capacity in the original work.the manga and anime is only different by the anime showing the exact punches of a fight in the manga.
This is irrelevant to the calcs at hand.Also mate did u just say Baji is comp to no names when he is literally beating 50 of them in the same scene without being tagged once...
This isn't enough evidence to say the anime is the primary canon by our standards?Not only is Wakui supervising the anime, the anime is faithful.
Oh and BTW, wakui dont jst supervise it, he closely ensures everything is correct:https://anibase.net/en/anime/4kJn1/Tokyo-Revengers-Season-2
Synchronize says it best heresnip
no it aint, u saying it aint a real argument dont make it an argument. the WHOLE FIGHT IS IN THE MANGA, the anime expands on it, stop tryna lieIts in the OP and its very evidently very much different, this isn't a real argument
untrue, the fight exists the anime shows the fight, and even the part of him doing the feat just in more detailUntrue, the actual bit being calculated literally does not exist in any capacity in the original work.
u claimed hes comp to no names LOLThis is irrelevant to the calcs at hand.
LOL, i gave you several sources, several indicators, jst say u aint wanna accept it cause i gave u so much evidence, dont lieThis isn't enough evidence to say the anime is the primary canon by our standards?
Synchronise says it best here
Here's a source that's fine to accept: Ken Wakui directly stating in an interview that the anime is his true vision of the work, or other flowery stuff like that.LOL, i gave you several sources, several indicators, jst say u aint wanna accept it cause i gave u so much evidence, dont lie
the wiki is a translation of his interviews...Here's a source that's fine to accept: Ken Wakui directly stating in an interview that the anime is his true vision of the work, or other flowery stuff like that.
And no, I don't need some wiki, I need a direct interview with the man.
its okay to admit ur wrong, but its not okay to ignore evidence@LostLightt So, no, it's not sufficient. Supervising is not a show of canonicity. "Faithful" is not a show of canonicity. Attack on Titan went through hell to get it's anime as canon and it literally has what's needed for anime being primary canon.
Look on the bright side though mate, you have an excuse to just make anime profiles for Tokyo Revengers.
Let me just...its okay to admit ur wrong, but its not okay to ignore evidence
3 sources state its supervised with one saying it's CLOSELY SUPERVISED
its faithful to a tee
liden films is consistently producing faithful animations
I'm not saying one thing here proves it, i'm saying according to the page on vsbw, all ts combined is valid.
Sorry bud
For an actual explanantion: Evidence that does not align with wiki standard is not evidence. This will be the case forever.its okay to admit ur wrong
Would you be able to ping a third staff here? Nearly everyone is in agreement of the thread, just waiting for a third vote due to TR being a controversial verseI am still in agreement with Dale here.
idk how ur gonna argue against evidence saying he directly heavily supervised the anime.Let me just...
For an actual explanantion: Evidence that does not align with wiki standard is not evidence. This will be the case forever.
so ur just gonna ignore the 3 sources, several faithfulness, ect?I am still in agreement with Dale here.
...idk how ur gonna argue against evidence saying he directly heavily supervised the anime.
except it's not, it ADDS scenes. Canonicity word for word is not just "oh everything happens", word for word is "Everything is the same as the Manga just animated".so ur just gonna ignore the 3 sources, several faithfulness, ect?
dude who made the rule implied my shi would be valid
![]()
Classroom Of The Elite: Anime Canocity
Due to recent changes in the canonicity of anime, manga, and their adaptations, I think this is something that should definitely be discussed: Is the anime Classroom of the Elite canon to the main story? Here are interview scans regarding Shōgo Kinugasa and his opinion on the anime. This...vsbattles.com
tr is adapted word for word
cote literally does the same thing, they add scenes change words but it's still accepted...
You have been told
By multiple staff
And normal users
That supervising the anime
Is not canonicity proof
By our standards.
If that's a problem, make a site wide CRT.
except it's not, it ADDS scenes. Canonicity word for word is not just "oh everything happens", word for word is "Everything is the same as the Manga just animated".
If it is an addition to an existing fight, then it ceases being word for word. An extra shot? Not word for word. An extra part of a fight? Not word for word.
"Go to hell" and "Go to hell dickwad" is not word for word, ya can't have anything going against it, espeically not consistently and ESPEICALLY not when the additions are what's getting calced.
Then get it unaccepted with scans and evidence showing that. I am an equal opportunity hater, and two wrongs don't make a right.cote literally does the same thing, they add scenes change words but it's still accepted
If 80% of the stuff is dogshit and 20% is bland pasta, all you're gonna be tasting is dogshit. And the pasta really isn't standing on it's own.and i neva said supervsing the anime is canonicity proof
i said EVERYTHING COMBNIED is proof, and its' hard for u to deny it on any grounds
ur the one stonewallingIf 80% of the stuff is dogshit and 20% is bland pasta, all you're gonna be tasting is dogshit. And the pasta really isn't standing on it's own.
My final answer is agreeing with this thread and thus disagreeing with you. I have no interest in dealing with stonewalling based off of misconceptions.
N O means no.ur the one stonewalling
theres no evidence contradicting the canon thats reinforce heavily by several sources
Ye, ur saying the evidence is dogshit, but thats not a good analogy, it's more like one snowflake is in and of itself small, but several creates a larger more impressive ballN O means no.
Ye, ur saying the evidence is dogshit, but thats not a good analogy, it's more like one snowflake is in and of itself small, but several creates a larger more impressive ball
My final answer is agreeing with this thread and thus disagreeing with you.
who does ts bloke think he's talkin to, i aint stone wallin shi, bugger off if ur gonna insult me without substantiation mateReaper, don't reply to him
You already know he's stonewalling, it's just gonna clog up the thread
Yeah yeah, but one more for the roadReaper, don't reply to him
You already know he's stonewalling, it's just gonna clog up the thread
I fixed that for ya.whats so hard bout agreeing with an analogy thats obv soundproof
i'll accept ur final answer with great sadness and painYeah yeah, but one more for the road
I fixed that for ya.
Jokes aside, if it was "obv sound", you wouldn't be 0-2 on evaluation staff who agree with you vs disagree. Like I said, final answer, so...
![]()
Please don't misgender me, that's uncalled forwho does ts bloke think he's talkin to, i aint stone wallin shi, bugger off if ur gonna insult me without substantiation mate
mb jit, dont accuse me of misgendering u tho, i aint mean itPlease don't misgender me, that's uncalled for
dude who made the rule implied my shi would be valid
I don't think anyone's here opposing use of anime for feats from manga but with better visualization of feat, use of timeframe, etc. The fact that anime adapts 1:1 for everything else that's shown in manga just lets you to use anime version for them, that's not gonna work for additional scenes.If it was adapted word for word and it's extra viewing of the same feat then it should be fine
nc debunks, you stated not a single math issue, other than the explosion calcMost of the calcs are jank on the fact that they either use outdated values (Like glass destruction, we don't use glass destruction values at all anymore because they don't conform with our simplified standards for destruction values in general, couple that with the fact that junkyard cars might have the windshield be in deteriorating condition) or use methods that are a huge no-no against standards (Like smacking someone with a bat and sending them flying at high speeds and trying to derive LS from that).
Even the speed feats could possibly be inflated based on bad visuals or gross violations of our slow-mo rules.
The human throwing feats are also kinda sketch, as we have rules against using throwing feats for normal-weight people (Gotta be at least the weight of a motorbike or heavier to qualify now).
The explosion calc is also egregiously wrong, the car's bodywork is more or less untouched - this is just deflagration of gasoline inside the car (Which I don't have to tell you, is UNUSABLE).
The feats obviously not being 1:1 to the manga is a huge factor, but the above problems I believe are far, far bigger issues than us using tertiary canon.