Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I know it’s a minor nitpick, but users are allowed to do whatever they want as long as it doesn’t affect the wiki. I have asked a showrunner about some stuff before but you’ll never see a thread from me about his statementsHe needs to understand that users aren’t allowed to ask authors such questions.
That's not true. Our rules on asking authors about WoG apply whether or not a thread ends up being made about them.I know it’s a minor nitpick, but users are allowed to do whatever they want as long as it doesn’t affect the wiki. I have asked a showrunner about some stuff before but you’ll never see a thread from me about his statements
Then ban me for that. I asked a showrunner some questions.That's not true. Our rules on asking authors about WoG apply whether or not a thread ends up being made about them.
I'm not sure why you're acting like this. These are literally the rules. The challenging tone is childish when you, definitively, as a staff member, are breaking the rules. That shit sucks, man. At the very least, you should take this for the future to not bother authors, show runners, whatever, about powerscaling stuff.Yeah. Go on and report me to the HR.
Put your foot down. Give him a warning that this is, indeed, against the rules. If he does not relent, if he goes on doing it, I'd be absolutely fine with a ban. WoG is a pox on us.How do I explain to this user why we don't allow members to harass authors for WoG statements? One of the obvious examples of trying to lead the conversation while fishing for WoG statements.
If someone has a better explanation, I'd appreciate letting the user know. Otherwise, I'll have to block him since he clearly insists he should be allowed to continue and add them to the wiki.
I just think the rule is stupid, what I do on my personal life does concern anyone here. What I asked a showrunner in 2022, and what he gladly replied doesn’t concern anyone.I'm not sure why you're acting like this. These are literally the rules. The challenging tone is childish when you, definitively, as a staff member, are breaking the rules. That shit sucks, man. At the very least, you should take this for the future to not bother authors, show runners, whatever, about powerscaling stuff.
You're allowed to think the rule is stupid. I'm a bureaucrat and I think a lot of rules are stupid. But the contract is that you follow them. I'm not saying you're an evil dude for breaking them, but this rule is in place for a reason, and as a staff member, you are expected to adhere to the rules even moreso than a regular user. That's it.I just think the rule is stupid, what I do on my personal life does concern anyone here. What I asked a showrunner in 2022, and what he gladly replied doesn’t concern anyone.
That dude is indeed asking powerscaling questions and not even making an effort to hide it, and he is using for his own upgrades or whatever he had planned. What I asked was from a character I’ve never mentioned the name in this Wiki, even.
I believe that 2022 was before we made reforms to clarify the intent of the rule and make it read far more strict, so I think a lot of leniency would be given for that, since the previous rule made it sound more like we only care if it's harassment.What I asked a showrunner in 2022
You’ve already made your point clear, please leave it as it is and wait for the staff to review your report.Report
I decided to check this claim, since it's really easy to check, and you replied to that thread thirty-six times.Also, I only made one reply—no more than that.
Yes, I was given the right to speak, and that’s something I won’t deny. Bambu came and allowed me to comment as I wanted, and I do not deny that.I decided to check this claim, since it's really easy to check, and you replied to that thread thirty-six times.
Given your behaviour at the start of that thread, in a now-deleted reply, I am shocked you were given that much leniency. To allege that you weren't given a chance to respond is absolutely ridiculous.
I think it was probably best to keep the initial report up, even if later parts should've been clamped down on. It's important for invalid reports to stay up, so other users can be made aware of that.
I don't think that's important enough to undelete them, but I'd ask Reiner to not do so in these cases in the future.
idek why you are that offended by 1 word to come and snitch to admins. all i did was just clown on the comment section.I wanna make a report on someone which is on the same thread as discussed above, this was completely unnecessary and the guy straight up bypassed the filter by spacing out the letters. I'll give the images below in the event that it gets deleted or something like that:
[Edited to remove the post per DDM suggestion, above deleted post can still be read by staffs] - @Reiner04
Mind you, this was coming off completely out of context at all as @SomebodyData intervened to chill both of us out and the thread's going fine after that but the guy came outta nowhere and said this so yeah.
Its not that he was offended some words are prohibited thats why if you try to say them they get auto censored if you bypass the filter it counts as a rule violation. These are rules we all have to adhere toidek why you are that offended by 1 word to come and snitch to admins. all i did was just clown on the comment section.
okay@ApostolUmbrei
This is a warning.
Firstly: we strive to be a respectful community where people can debate civilly, and your comment ran afoul of our rules.
Please do not make any further insults towards other members. You're welcome to express that you think people are wrong in a more polite way.
Secondly: the slur filters exist for a reason, and bypassing them is not acceptable, no matter your intention.
Normally we'd issue at least a short ban, but I recognize that the slur you used is generally considered not as serious by many communities.
I will add this to the warning tracker.
icIts not that he was offended some words are prohibited thats why if you try to say them they get auto censored if you bypass the filter it counts as a rule violation. These are rules we all have to adhere to
It's not that I'm offended but the word is just prohibited on-site, that's all plus I don't think it's like necessary to say it out loud when it's already resolvedidek why you are that offended by 1 word to come and snitch to admins. all i did was just clown on the comment section.
There are derogatory slur words that are a strict violation of Fandom's TOS. And Fandom staff take these rules very seriously. Even if VSBW staff don't ban or remove your posts, a member of Fandom Staff might globally block you across Fandom anyway. So if you don't want that to happen to you, just do not say those taboo words or any other word they condemn.idek why you are that offended by 1 word to come and snitch to admins. all i did was just clown on the comment section.
Please reopen this thread so I can submit my final response. It was closed before I had the chance to post it, and after that, if nothing changes, it can be closed again.Well, I think that the re-word is only a slur word when used as a noun against another person, not when used as a adjective against an argument, but I may be mistaken.![]()
This is also a lie. The first staff evaluation was at post 84, after which you made six replies.You can review the replies after the staff joined—I made one response, and then the thread was closed. Is that fair?
No, you already had ample chance to.Please reopen this thread so I can submit my final response. It was closed before I had the chance to post it, and after that, if nothing changes, it can be closed again.
I believe you’ve misunderstood the situation. I’m referring to the replies I directed to the staff regarding the topic, not the comments I made after they had already joined the discussion. I mean the responses I gave directly to what the staff said. I only made two replies here and here, and I repeated the same point to a staff member who arrived later. That does not count as a new reply; it was simply a reference to my previous response.This is also a lie. The first staff evaluation was at post 84, after which you made six replies.
No, you already had ample chance to.
Checking the history of changes on the verse page is freeReporting @Mommyleona for not only saying he removed Ichigo’s accepted Realistic+ fear other than him saying “I removed it” when I asked for someone to provide me with a thread. But he also removed a speed calc which had nothing to do with his downgrade thread which was Hikone’s Realistic+ feat in CFYOW. @Mommyleona made a thread for a downgrade for the distance between the Soul king realm and the Soul Society. He never made a thread discarding Hikone’s feat done in a separate accepted canon novel yet removed the feat from the verse anyways and changed the verse page.
It's in the list of words that Fandom doesn't permit to be published at all.Well, I think that the r-word is only a slur word when used as a noun against another person, not when used as a adjective against an argument, but I may be mistaken.![]()
While understandable in theory, but in practice + high demand from Fandom staff, there is still this.Well, I think that the r-word is only a slur word when used as a noun against another person, not when used as a adjective against an argument, but I may be mistaken.![]()
So it's still something we have to enforce anyway.
- This also includes the words in its “-ed” form.
Ok, sorry. I realize it was rude of me
Only staff members and regular members staff have deemed highly trustworthy may participate in Staff Discussion threads unless an explicit exception is noted.
OP listed the thread as a CRT before it was moved to Staff Discussion. You should see my message when it happened.A ton of regular members are posting in this staff thread without any permission
![]()
Ban Roblox Verses on the wiki
Just ban our verses, it is clear that nobody liked them. We might as well Made a rule to ban everything related to Roblox because of the company itself and might cause harm in this site forum.vsbattles.com