• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Hellaverse Mega CRT (Concluded and Applied)

Status
Not open for further replies.
HAHHAHAHAHAHA OFC ITS OUTLIER HAHAHAHAHAHHHAHAHHAHAHAHABAVABABBAGAGAGAGAGAGAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHSHSHAGAGAGAGAGHSHAHAHSGAGAGAGAHAGAGAHAHGAHSHS I AM SO HAPPY TO SEE THIS AT 1 AM AND SLEEPY AND AHAHAHHASHHSHS
 
HAHHAHAHAHAHA OFC ITS OUTLIER HAHAHAHAHAHHHAHAHHAHAHAHABAVABABBAGAGAGAGAGAGAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHSHSHAGAGAGAGAGHSHAHAHSGAGAGAGAHAGAGAHAHGAHSHS I AM SO HAPPY TO SEE THIS AT 1 AM AND SLEEPY AND AHAHAHHASHHSHS
To be completely fair, I do see it that even with these gun anti-feats, this in the future can be disregarded as an outlier anyways.
 
Don't really see why this should be considered. A lot of times people use examples from other verses to apply something. How is that invalid in any way?
Different verses, different contexts, two wrongs don't make a right and the argument doesn't actually attack the OP, it's just a tu quoque that doesn't add anything productive other than needless complaints like "This verse did it too so why can't we?!!". I genuinely don't care about other people using examples from other verses as their arguments are wrong too (plus that's just a popularity arg which adds nothing)
 
Different verses, different contexts,
That's not really true for all examples of this. Besides, what Shion said was over exaggeration.
two wrongs don't make a right
What are the "two wrongs" here exactly?
the argument doesn't actually attack the OP
The point here is to attack gun feats being anti-feats for stuff like AP and Speed, which different verses notably don't have as anti-feats. This is a point in the OP.
it's just a tu quoque that doesn't add anything productive other than needless complaints like "This verse did it too so why can't we?!!".
I think it's actually valid in many situations depending on what exactly is the context. A lot of verses can share the same issue which causes them to have the same conclusion. As in the anti-feats being accepted or not.
I genuinely don't care about other people using examples from other verses
You literally just said we should make a discussion rule to ban it.
as their arguments are wrong too
In most cases that's not really true, and no one presented any argument yet for why that should be the case.
 
Different verses, different contexts, two wrongs don't make a right and the argument doesn't actually attack the OP, it's just a tu quoque that doesn't add anything productive other than needless complaints like "This verse did it too so why can't we?!!". I genuinely don't care about other people using examples from other verses as their arguments are wrong too (plus that's just a popularity arg which adds nothing)
There are instances where, even in different verses, similar arguments can be used, and if this type of argument is already accepted in other cases, it makes sense to use it as support, provided it is done coherently.
 
VSBW can't decide on what speed electricity moves through the air. It's well known it moves through wires at Relativistic speeds
It don't.
fUgUe7V.png
 
Can I agree now and read later.

Just saying.

Well, I agree with this since at least the OP seems coherent, idk when or how this verse got to tier 5 considering the last memorable thing I know about it is an angel getting injured from falling rocks and rubble.

Tier 5 rocks guys.

Well I should shut up and not derail tho lol.
 
Well, I agree with this since at least the OP seems coherent, idk when or how this verse got to tier 5 considering the last memorable thing I know about it is an angel getting injured from falling rocks and rubble.
Is it crazy to hear that the angel you're referring to isn't even one of the people who got upgraded to tier 5? Only Lucifer and Adam currently scale to 5-B.
 
Is it crazy to hear that the angel you're referring to isn't even one of the people who got upgraded to tier 5? Only Lucifer and Adam currently scale to 5-B.
Upscaling angelic weapons to such tier based on the fact they're needed to harm angelic beings does imply characters like her should at least get a rudimentary scaling within said tier unless I missed something.

And the character who got harmed wasn't exactly millions of times weaker than the being who stabbed Adam, didn't exactly come off as being several orders of magnitudes weaker either.
 
Upscaling angelic weapons to such tier based on the fact they're needed to harm angelic beings does imply characters like her should at least get a rudimentary scaling within said tier unless I missed something.
What exactly is the point you're trying to prove here? Angelic weapons can harm characters like Lucifer and Adam, killing the latter entirely.
And the character who got harmed wasn't exactly millions of times weaker than the being who stabbed Adam, didn't exactly come off as being several orders of magnitudes weaker either.
...??? What are you even talking about
 
What exactly is the point you're trying to prove here? Angelic weapons can harm characters like Lucifer and Adam, killing the latter entirely.
I remember some plot point about the character who got harmed by falling rubble needing angelic weapons to be harmed, if angelic weapons and people holding them are to be at tier 5, so would the character who was harmed by falling rubble no?

For the latter, the character we're talking about isn't exactly be millions of times weaker than nifty, nor does it seem like the angelic weapons grant any kind of power boost for people holding them?

Granted these are conclusions formed with limited knowledge but if the premises of "angelic beings need angelic weapons to be harmed" and "Angelic weapons and their holders are tier 5" hold, angelic beings and characters with similar characteristics should logically speaking be scaled to the same tier as the angelic weapons and their holders are scaled to.

Well given the interpretation given for them here anyways.
 
I remember some plot point about the character who got harmed by falling rubble needing angelic weapons to be harmed,
That has nothing to do with their durability, and was later proven false anyways. It's only an anti-feat to their invincibility, but not for angelic weapons.
For the latter, the character we're talking about isn't exactly be millions of times weaker than nifty, nor does it seem like the angelic weapons grant any kind of power boost for people holding them?
What? All she did was stab Adam. What power boost are you talking about?
"Angelic weapons and their holders are tier 5"
No one claimed angelic weapon holders are tier 5. Only Adam is, but because he survived attacks from an enraged Lucifer.
angelic beings and characters with similar characteristics should logically speaking be scaled to the same tier as the angelic weapons and their holders are scaled to.
No angelic being besides Seraphims and Elders are similar to Lucifer.
 
That has nothing to do with their durability, and was later proven false anyways. It's only an anti-feat to their invincibility, but not for angelic weapons.
Those are mutually exclusive?

What defines their invincibility then?
And why are angelic weapons being deemed tier 5 and not dura neg?
Why could nifty, allegedly tier 9, harm Adam when she scales nowhere near him when holding an angelic weapon?
If Adam was truly that much stronger and more durable, with angelic weapons having no power boost to amp her and without having durability negating abilies , she would have never even penetrated his skin no matter how hard she tries.
The scaling here is a bit flimsy.

What even is the current interpretation for angelic weapons, why are angels invincible against any kind of damage that isn't induced by them, and why are characters capable of harming other characters quadrillions of times stronger than them when holding them?


What? All she did was stab Adam. What power boost are you talking about?
...She is 9A.
He is 5B.

How do you suppose a 9A character can harm a 5B one?
No one claimed angelic weapon holders are tier 5. Only Adam is, but because he survived attacks from an enraged Lucifer.

The OP says otherwise.

due to all the reasons above, it stands to reason that Angelic Weapons should scale to tier 5. What does this mean then? Well, it just means that all people who wield angelic weapons should have tier 5. However, there are things in the verse that can withstand Angelic weapons

No angelic being besides Seraphims and Elders are similar to Lucifer.
This disregards the point, if angelic beings can only be harmed by angelic weapons, the underlying implication here is only weapons of a certain quality or caliber can inflict damage, if the latter is what's being assumed, as what I see being the case here due to assigning them a specific tier, ALL angelic beings should scale to tier 5.

If the former is what's being assumed, the scaling becomes nonsensical since 9A characters can harm 5B ones somehow.

But this will be my last comment regarding this topic, at least until I bother to watch this show myself or some kind of thread regarding this topic gets posted.
 
What defines their invincibility then?
What makes you think needing to be killed by a specific weapon means they are at that level of durability? Mind you, they can literally harm each other and one of them literally got their arm torn by a boulder.
What defines their invincibility then?
That it can only be negated by a specific weapon, which again, was already proven wrong and we don't accept it here.
And why are angelic weapons being deemed tier 5 and not dura neg?
First off, Heaven's gate survived M.O.L blast.
Second off, the default assumption would be that it scales to that level, not that it is dura neg. You'd need an actual statement to prove that a weapon like that negates durability outright.
Why could nifty, allegedly tier 9, harm Adam when she scales nowhere near him when holding an angelic weapon?
Because the angelic weapon itself can pierce through 5-B characters. Do you seriously think a character needs to be comparable to stab someone with a 5-B knife?
If Adam was truly that much stronger and more durable, with angelic weapons having no power boost to amp her and without having durability negating abilies , she would have never even penetrated his skin no matter how hard she tries.
No? Straight up not how it works nor how it would be accepted. The knife can literally pierce 5-B characters, so why would it be limited by your physical capabilities?
What even is the current interpretation for angelic weapons, why are angels invincible against any kind of damage that isn't induced by them, and why are characters capable of harming other characters quadrillions of times stronger than them when holding them?
They aren't invincible, it just feels like you aren't even listening to what I'm saying. They are capable of harming them because the material used is simply that sharp.
How do you suppose a 9A character can harm a 5B one?
With a knife that can do that obviously.
The OP says otherwise.
You're majorly taking it without a bit of thought. They'd have 5-B specifically with it in their arsenal, because it's a weapon they use, not because it empowers them.
How do you suppose a 9A character can harm a 5B one?
Because she stabbed him with an angelic weapon?
This disregards the point, if angelic beings can only be harmed by angelic weapons, the underlying implication here is only weapons of a certain quality or caliber can inflict damage, if the latter is what's being assumed, as what I see being the case here due to assigning them a specific tier, ALL angelic beings should scale to tier 5.
Straight up not true. Just because a certain weapon is stated to be able to harm certain characters, doesn't mean it's their durability, especially when they're described as invincible rather than durable. And again, it's been proven false and denied.
 
The might of lilith fired at alostor before emily saves alostor. İts shined again because how far away its fired and they see it when its get closer, there is so many examples in the fiction
But overlords shouldnt be scale at ftl, they clearly weaker and slower than emily
Vox captured him just because she caught of guard.
Only adam,seraphims, and morning star family should scale to it.
Maybe alostor in full power can scale to it because hes the strongest sinner in hell
 
Vox captured him just because she caught of guard.
If she was FTL Vox wouldn't have caught her off-guard, she would literally be over 1 MILLION times faster than him.

To put that into perspective, the average human's full sprint is 5 meters a second, compared to a Garden Snail's 0.0134112 Meters per second, an only 372.822715342x speed difference.
 
If she was FTL Vox wouldn't have caught her off-guard, she would literally be over 1 MILLION times faster than him.

To put that into perspective, the average human's full sprint is 5 meters a second, compared to a Garden Snail's 0.0134112 Meters per second, an only 372.822715342x speed difference.
İt doesnt work like that i suppose
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top