- 13,150
- 4,808
Outlier or Baxter scales...chooseActually in regards to MHS+ Vox electricity, what to do with this?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Outlier or Baxter scales...chooseActually in regards to MHS+ Vox electricity, what to do with this?
Outlier, I guessActually in regards to MHS+ Vox electricity, what to do with this?
Don't really see why this should be considered. A lot of times people use examples from other verses to apply something. How is that invalid in any way?We need a general discussion rule banning whataboutism bro. Agree with the CRT
I think it would be possible to justify Mach 11 speeds for smaller discharges, similar to Andrew's Spider-Man feat.Actually in regards to MHS+ Vox electricity, what to do with this? Doubt it's slower when going through wires lol
It's so funny that Adam is gonna be Supersonic+HAHHAHAHAHAHA OFC ITS OUTLIER HAHAHAHAHAHHHAHAHHAHAHAHABAVABABBAGAGAGAGAGAGAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHSHSHAGAGAGAGAGHSHAHAHSGAGAGAGAHAGAGAHAHGAHSHS I AM SO HAPPY TO SEE THIS AT 1 AM AND SLEEPY AND AHAHAHHASHHSHS
Even funnier because it doesn't matter since 99% of matchups on this wiki have speed equalizedIt's so funny that Adam is gonna be Supersonic+
To be completely fair, I do see it that even with these gun anti-feats, this in the future can be disregarded as an outlier anyways.HAHHAHAHAHAHA OFC ITS OUTLIER HAHAHAHAHAHHHAHAHHAHAHAHABAVABABBAGAGAGAGAGAGAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHSHSHAGAGAGAGAGHSHAHAHSGAGAGAGAHAGAGAHAHGAHSHS I AM SO HAPPY TO SEE THIS AT 1 AM AND SLEEPY AND AHAHAHHASHHSHS
honestly this makes the most sense so we don't got baxter>Alastor in speedI mean, electricity speed varies depending on lots of factors, so you could just give Vox "Up to MHS+" for his electricity or whatever
Different verses, different contexts, two wrongs don't make a right and the argument doesn't actually attack the OP, it's just a tu quoque that doesn't add anything productive other than needless complaints like "This verse did it too so why can't we?!!". I genuinely don't care about other people using examples from other verses as their arguments are wrong too (plus that's just a popularity arg which adds nothing)Don't really see why this should be considered. A lot of times people use examples from other verses to apply something. How is that invalid in any way?
That's not really true for all examples of this. Besides, what Shion said was over exaggeration.Different verses, different contexts,
What are the "two wrongs" here exactly?two wrongs don't make a right
The point here is to attack gun feats being anti-feats for stuff like AP and Speed, which different verses notably don't have as anti-feats. This is a point in the OP.the argument doesn't actually attack the OP
I think it's actually valid in many situations depending on what exactly is the context. A lot of verses can share the same issue which causes them to have the same conclusion. As in the anti-feats being accepted or not.it's just a tu quoque that doesn't add anything productive other than needless complaints like "This verse did it too so why can't we?!!".
You literally just said we should make a discussion rule to ban it.I genuinely don't care about other people using examples from other verses
In most cases that's not really true, and no one presented any argument yet for why that should be the case.as their arguments are wrong too
There are instances where, even in different verses, similar arguments can be used, and if this type of argument is already accepted in other cases, it makes sense to use it as support, provided it is done coherently.Different verses, different contexts, two wrongs don't make a right and the argument doesn't actually attack the OP, it's just a tu quoque that doesn't add anything productive other than needless complaints like "This verse did it too so why can't we?!!". I genuinely don't care about other people using examples from other verses as their arguments are wrong too (plus that's just a popularity arg which adds nothing)
VSBW can't decide on what speed electricity moves through the air. It's well known it moves through wires at Relativistic speedsIMO, absolutely nothing since, whenever he does stuff through straight technology, it seems to be the same speed as electricity........whatever VSBW decides that is.
It don't.VSBW can't decide on what speed electricity moves through the air. It's well known it moves through wires at Relativistic speeds
That's not accepted too.It's well known it moves through wires at Relativistic speeds
I mean Relativistic generally begins around 10%
True...Wait a damn minute, that's not a DB reference?
Is it crazy to hear that the angel you're referring to isn't even one of the people who got upgraded to tier 5? Only Lucifer and Adam currently scale to 5-B.Well, I agree with this since at least the OP seems coherent, idk when or how this verse got to tier 5 considering the last memorable thing I know about it is an angel getting injured from falling rocks and rubble.
Upscaling angelic weapons to such tier based on the fact they're needed to harm angelic beings does imply characters like her should at least get a rudimentary scaling within said tier unless I missed something.Is it crazy to hear that the angel you're referring to isn't even one of the people who got upgraded to tier 5? Only Lucifer and Adam currently scale to 5-B.
What exactly is the point you're trying to prove here? Angelic weapons can harm characters like Lucifer and Adam, killing the latter entirely.Upscaling angelic weapons to such tier based on the fact they're needed to harm angelic beings does imply characters like her should at least get a rudimentary scaling within said tier unless I missed something.
...??? What are you even talking aboutAnd the character who got harmed wasn't exactly millions of times weaker than the being who stabbed Adam, didn't exactly come off as being several orders of magnitudes weaker either.
That's below 9-A btw, eyeballingly around 9-C to MAYBE 9-B. So idk when or how this verse got to 9-A either.idk when or how this verse got to tier 5 considering the last memorable thing I know about it is an angel getting injured from falling rocks and rubble.
I remember some plot point about the character who got harmed by falling rubble needing angelic weapons to be harmed, if angelic weapons and people holding them are to be at tier 5, so would the character who was harmed by falling rubble no?What exactly is the point you're trying to prove here? Angelic weapons can harm characters like Lucifer and Adam, killing the latter entirely.
That has nothing to do with their durability, and was later proven false anyways. It's only an anti-feat to their invincibility, but not for angelic weapons.I remember some plot point about the character who got harmed by falling rubble needing angelic weapons to be harmed,
What? All she did was stab Adam. What power boost are you talking about?For the latter, the character we're talking about isn't exactly be millions of times weaker than nifty, nor does it seem like the angelic weapons grant any kind of power boost for people holding them?
No one claimed angelic weapon holders are tier 5. Only Adam is, but because he survived attacks from an enraged Lucifer."Angelic weapons and their holders are tier 5"
No angelic being besides Seraphims and Elders are similar to Lucifer.angelic beings and characters with similar characteristics should logically speaking be scaled to the same tier as the angelic weapons and their holders are scaled to.
Also FP Alastor for harming him should be too, but some lazy procrastinating bum still did not make a CRT to fix that. Shame on him.but because he survived attacks from an enraged Lucifer.
Those are mutually exclusive?That has nothing to do with their durability, and was later proven false anyways. It's only an anti-feat to their invincibility, but not for angelic weapons.
...She is 9A.What? All she did was stab Adam. What power boost are you talking about?
No one claimed angelic weapon holders are tier 5. Only Adam is, but because he survived attacks from an enraged Lucifer.
due to all the reasons above, it stands to reason that Angelic Weapons should scale to tier 5. What does this mean then? Well, it just means that all people who wield angelic weapons should have tier 5. However, there are things in the verse that can withstand Angelic weapons
This disregards the point, if angelic beings can only be harmed by angelic weapons, the underlying implication here is only weapons of a certain quality or caliber can inflict damage, if the latter is what's being assumed, as what I see being the case here due to assigning them a specific tier, ALL angelic beings should scale to tier 5.No angelic being besides Seraphims and Elders are similar to Lucifer.
What makes you think needing to be killed by a specific weapon means they are at that level of durability? Mind you, they can literally harm each other and one of them literally got their arm torn by a boulder.What defines their invincibility then?
That it can only be negated by a specific weapon, which again, was already proven wrong and we don't accept it here.What defines their invincibility then?
First off, Heaven's gate survived M.O.L blast.And why are angelic weapons being deemed tier 5 and not dura neg?
Because the angelic weapon itself can pierce through 5-B characters. Do you seriously think a character needs to be comparable to stab someone with a 5-B knife?Why could nifty, allegedly tier 9, harm Adam when she scales nowhere near him when holding an angelic weapon?
No? Straight up not how it works nor how it would be accepted. The knife can literally pierce 5-B characters, so why would it be limited by your physical capabilities?If Adam was truly that much stronger and more durable, with angelic weapons having no power boost to amp her and without having durability negating abilies , she would have never even penetrated his skin no matter how hard she tries.
They aren't invincible, it just feels like you aren't even listening to what I'm saying. They are capable of harming them because the material used is simply that sharp.What even is the current interpretation for angelic weapons, why are angels invincible against any kind of damage that isn't induced by them, and why are characters capable of harming other characters quadrillions of times stronger than them when holding them?
With a knife that can do that obviously.How do you suppose a 9A character can harm a 5B one?
You're majorly taking it without a bit of thought. They'd have 5-B specifically with it in their arsenal, because it's a weapon they use, not because it empowers them.The OP says otherwise.
Because she stabbed him with an angelic weapon?How do you suppose a 9A character can harm a 5B one?
Straight up not true. Just because a certain weapon is stated to be able to harm certain characters, doesn't mean it's their durability, especially when they're described as invincible rather than durable. And again, it's been proven false and denied.This disregards the point, if angelic beings can only be harmed by angelic weapons, the underlying implication here is only weapons of a certain quality or caliber can inflict damage, if the latter is what's being assumed, as what I see being the case here due to assigning them a specific tier, ALL angelic beings should scale to tier 5.
Evil and intimidating Alastor's shieldAnd why are angеlic weapons being deemed tier 5 and not dura neg?
Hows about Alastor just gets Dura-Neg Resistance with his magic.Evil and intimidating Alastor's shield
Hows about Alastor just gets Dura-Neg Resistance with his magic.
If she was FTL Vox wouldn't have caught her off-guard, she would literally be over 1 MILLION times faster than him.Vox captured him just because she caught of guard.
İt doesnt work like that i supposeIf she was FTL Vox wouldn't have caught her off-guard, she would literally be over 1 MILLION times faster than him.
To put that into perspective, the average human's full sprint is 5 meters a second, compared to a Garden Snail's 0.0134112 Meters per second, an only 372.822715342x speed difference.