For a given definition of a character...
Can you prove this or is it just an opinion?
Last time u presented me a Honkai "R>F feat" was a simulation dawg
thats the point, hi3 is 11-C and Ai chan had R>F which is 10BLast time u presented me a Honkai "R>F feat" was a simulation dawg
That's fair enough.
Her being an administrator shouldn't have any bearing on the main story, she created the game and made herself the administrator the game has no bearing on main story because it's just it, a game (besides accumulating whishpower)
It is legitimately just that she's stated to have seen the main character's stories and alternative versions of it and there's statements that she made the game to show the captains said journey. There's definitely grounds for R>F but it gets disqualified because she's fallible within the realms of what she sees as a story, unless you want to give the Spiritual Adam R>F transcendence through its very weird Reality Fiction statements, but they likely won't hold up, and it'd leave the scaling in a weird place.
How is this R>F if you seen the stories of the main characters and their au's then you have multiversal precognition/postcognition nothing about R>F
She made a game containing the narratives of the characters, we view the game from these character's points of view, which Ai Lambda is inherently more real than because in-lore she made the narrative we're playing and is the one providing the interface for the game to be played.
The 1st is true, though the actual events in the narrative (the narrative of Hi3) DO effect Lambda, the Spiritual Adam, that's the issue.
But she didn't ,she made a game that is just a game, nothing more than a piece of code she didn't create a narrative she created a game based on real people, just because i can create a game about something doesn't mean i have R>F superiority.
Also that's why i say and will continue to say that ch 35 is beautiful , because there is no 4th wall break that players collectively hallucinated but sheer humanity won the day.
What are we even on about at this point
- Lambda's discussion before the Kevin fight is just legitimately horrible and ruins the immersion in the most intense part of the story, ignoring it with a different interpretation so the story 'is perfect' is just kinda ass, regardless of if Lambda is any more or less real than Hi3's reality, it just reeks of bad fanservice that legitimately left a bad taste in my mouth, especially when the Core Key was used in the final fight. The story doesn't NEED to be perfect, Chapter 35 is a good chapter, it just had a bad part.
Let me dumb it downI'm gonna really dumb this down.
Layers of reality
1- Us
2- AI-Lambda
3 - Hi3
We play Hi3, we view things on Hi3's level.
AI-Lambda makes a game based on people from her reality, she made and administrates Honkai Impact 3rd, what she sees as a game is the Hi3 layer of reality, making her 'more real' than the canon events of the story. She even talks about the actual mechanics of the game in chapter 35, how if they only fight Kevin with 3 people they'll have infinite retries because that's the mechanic of the game Honkai Impact 3rd. She blatantly views Honkai Impact 3rd as a game beneath her.
The issue is that she's also blatantly effected by Project Stigma which is a disqualifier for R>F.
What are we even on about at this point
I will not let anyone ruin the narrative for ******* Bumtain glaze , turning something beautiful into self-inserting illogical trash.
You do realise that if Lambda makes the events of Hi3 accessible as a game within the verse then everything inside that game is inherently less real, right?
No it doesn't HI3 exists lambda is in HI3 she makes a game based on real history and sends it into the multiverse
From Chapter 35:
Occams razor the key can support 3 people because it's its limit, the whishpower bent project STIGMA what's a bit of time bending.
Claude's breaking point
