• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Steve vs Indominus Rex | A Minecraft Movie vs Jurassic Park | 1-7-0 GRACE

Perhaps it's because the calculation considers what was destroyed as a single stone, when in reality it's several stones of different sizes arranged randomly. It's impossible to know if all the stones were actually destroyed or just thrown out of the screen's view. I think this is my problem with the calculation.

But I don't know how the wiki handles this type of situation, at least in more popular verses. I think this calculation would be blocked.
 
That's why you can notice it around the 10th second...

Anyway, I think I'll open a thread to address this later, but it's best to avoid derailing this match, so let's continue talking about the battle for now.
 
That's why you can notice it around the 10th second...

Anyway, I think I'll open a thread to address this later, but it's best to avoid derailing this match, so let's continue talking about the battle for now.
Yeh

I think Indo wins, Iron Golems might matter but not as much as TNT
 
Well, the destroyed stones were already somewhat broken when Spino headbutted them, and the angle of the scene obscures a bit of what might have happened to the stones, since there were multiple stones and perhaps some were already reduced in size... But I can see an argument for pulverization as well... Well, I'm not sure, the feat seems incorrect to me.
They are not necessarily enough to invalidate the feat or automatically “block” the calculation.
Perhaps it's because the calculation considers what was destroyed as a single stone, when in reality it's several stones of different sizes arranged randomly. It's impossible to know if all the stones were actually destroyed or just thrown out of the screen's view. I think this is my problem with the calculation.

But I don't know how the wiki handles this type of situation, at least in more popular verses. I think this calculation would be blocked.
The rocks already being cracked does not make the feat unusable by itself, especially since fractured canyon rocks are common in fiction and still regularly used for fragmentation feats. The important part is that the impact visibly destroys and disperses the rock mass rather than simply pushing it away.
 
They are not necessarily enough to invalidate the feat or automatically “block” the calculation.

The rocks already being cracked does not make the feat unusable by itself, especially since fractured canyon rocks are common in fiction and still regularly used for fragmentation feats. The important part is that the impact visibly destroys and disperses the rock mass rather than simply pushing it away.
I understand, that makes sense I think, although it seems a bit incorrect since it appears there's a good margin to increase the calculated value, but what you're saying makes sense.
 
Back
Top