• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Question about Low Outerverse (Low 1-A)

Messages
3,799
Reaction score
410
So from I understand, Low Outerverse, or Low 1-A or Von Neumann Universes are, they either encompass, or can affect structures which encompass, the collection including all possible dimensional spaces.

Would say a realm which contains a Hilbert Space/uncountably infinite dimensional space as an area within be considered Low 1-A Since this realm/space is held within itself? Like a small ice cube inside a drinking glass?
 
Last edited:
No, that just means you are higher into High 1-B+

You need more context and evidence for this to be Low 1-A
 
No, that just means you are higher into High 1-B+

You need more context and evidence for this to be Low 1-A
I am just trying to exactly understand what the context of “encompassing the collection of all possible spaces” means as an example, like as in higher layers?

Because in the description said usually being “above dimensions” is acceptable without further context.
 
Last edited:
I am just trying to exactly understand what the context of “encompassing the collection of all possible spaces” means as an example, like as in higher layers?
Assume X is the “set of all sets that do not contain themselves”.

Since in itself, X is a set, it must mean it contains itself (since X contains all sets.) But with this, a problem arises: X must only contain sets that do not contain themselves, thus X cannot contain X otherwise it would mean that it contains a set (X) that contains itself. But then, if it doesn’t contain itself, it must be contained within itself, but if it does that, it cannot contain itself. And so you repeat this process ad infinitum.

To resolve this contradiction, X cannot be a set, rather it must be a Proper Class. A Proper Class is a collection “too large” to be a set, essentially. As such, the paradox is resolved because it no longer contains itself (since it is not a set to be contained.)

This is the core concept behind Low 1-A—Russell’s Paradox.

To relate it back to the tier: it is essentially to say that Low 1-A is a realm “too large” to be spatiotemporal. Because if it contains all possible Space-Times, it means that it itself cannot be included in any of those Space-Times, thus it transcends Space and Time by sheer size.
 
Would say a realm which contains a Hilbert Space
We don't use Hilbert spaces for dimensional scaling.
/uncountably infinite dimensional space as an area within be considered Low 1-A Since this realm/space is holds it within itself? Like a small ice cube inside a drinking glass?
No. If anything, it is stated where that would actually scale.
Characters or objects who can significantly affect, create and/or destroy infinite-dimensional space. Characters who can meddle with spaces with uncountably infinite or above dimensions should have a "+" modifier in their Attack Potency section (High Hyperverse level+).
I am just trying to exactly understand what the context of “encompassing the collection of all possible spaces” means as an example, like as in higher layers?
Think of set theory.
 
@Mythic381 from what I looked up, Hilbert Space is usable but you have to prove that it is a physical aspect to the cosmology. In this case for the thread question, it is.

Assume X is the “set of all sets that do not contain themselves”.

Since in itself, X is a set, it must mean it contains itself (since X contains all sets.) But with this, a problem arises: X must only contain sets that do not contain themselves, thus X cannot contain X otherwise it would mean that it contains a set (X) that contains itself. But then, if it doesn’t contain itself, it must be contained within itself, but if it does that, it cannot contain itself. And so you repeat this process ad infinitum.

To resolve this contradiction, X cannot be a set, rather it must be a Proper Class. A Proper Class is a collection “too large” to be a set, essentially. As such, the paradox is resolved because it no longer contains itself (since it is not a set to be contained.)

This is the core concept behind Low 1-A—Russell’s Paradox.

To relate it back to the tier: it is essentially to say that Low 1-A is a realm “too large” to be spatiotemporal. Because if it contains all possible Space-Times, it means that it itself cannot be included in any of those Space-Times, thus it transcends Space and Time by sheer size.

Okay, I think I got it, so in that case, where this space transcends space and time reality, it is infinite in of itself and the Hilbert space is merely a part of it where they can “climb up it”. Being above infinite dimensions.
 
Okay, I think I got it, so in that case, where this space transcends space and time reality, it is infinite in of itself and the Hilbert space is merely a part of it where they can “climb up it”. Being above infinite dimensions.
Not sure what this entails exactly.

If you’re saying that Hilbert Space would be contained within it, yea, that’d be true. But that’s also true for any set with a cardinality bigger than R.
 
Not sure what this entails exactly.

If you’re saying that Hilbert Space would be contained within it, yea, that’d be true. But that’s also true for any set with a cardinality bigger than R.
Do you mean the "Cardinality bigger than R (set of real numbers)" regarding dimensions being something that is already uncountably infinite dimensions? If so then I mentioned that in the OP.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top