This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
I've been asked by a few people about this thread by now. I don't have the time presently to examine the context and thus evaluate the thread, so I will not be voting. But I did want to offer my thoughts on the questions around resurrection, healing, and regeneration.
The important difference...
I don't believe it would be in anyone's best interest to rile up tensions on the thread further by addressing the comment there, so I will say this here.
You will drop the topic and leave it be not because someone else will concede to your demand, but because you have been warned already...
If further hostile and accusatory comments by staff members derail this thread further, I am willing to bring up the parties involved with HR.
On a similar note, if you do believe that there is legitimate misconduct by staff members occurring in this thread, then you can and should contact HR...
I haven't forgotten about this thread, and I've seen the notifications requesting my input. I've just been too busy to respond. My apologies if this causes any delays, but I likely will not be able to respond today - perhaps in 24 hours or so, if my input is still needed.
To be clear on this - what do you think defines a 'concept'? The crux here is that you seem to think the qualities found are both insufficient to fit the definition of a 'concept' and that there are defining features of a concept that aren't included. Your example vaguely hints to what you might...
So, before anything else, there's two things I should say. One: I have not yet read through everything that has been said in this debate. I'm aware this is not a good standard, but what I am seeing so far is a lot of very trivial debate - things being argued about that come down to...
I'm going to keep this brief, because I believe most people here already saw my concerns on the previous GoW thread about this.
Stop with the tone. You can only politely phrase and reframe accusatory remarks as mere observations and claims so far before it is obvious to everyone else viewing...
It was an inappropriate comment, but he has apologised for it now. I would rather neither the main thread nor this one is used for open complaints about the matter.
Hah. Another thread for the peasants of the land, who slave away on the Content Revision fields in the desperate hope of acknowledgement by their evaluating lords and ladies. How winsome. swirls Versus Battles Wiki brand wine glass with boundless outerversal layers of smug grins and 1-A...
I'll reserve any firm judgement until later, but there is a small argument in favour of deletion here I'd like to bring up that I don't often hear in the discussions around whether SCP should remain on the wiki.
It's hard to deny that there is a noteworthy portion of the Versus Battles Wiki...
The particular number of light elements involved does interest me - how tens of thousands were involved in the original feat, and the sun can maintain luminosity with several hundreds removed - but I'm not sure if this enables us to deduce anything more than we know at present.
Unfortunately, I...
Apologies if this seems pedantic, but - the last sentence interests me. 'The majority of the light elements had expired, having completed their...'. What does the next section after this scan say?
Can you provide a scan for the last one? The scans in the OP end with the monsters 'crumbling into liquid form', so I don't know what the text says for the last part.
At this stage, I'm not content with a possibly rating. I can acknowledge intuitions as much as I would like, but I still don't believe this justification meets the standard of being 'reliable to a notable, but mild' degree as established for possibly ratings on the Attack Potency page. It's just...