• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

NIHILITY Meets DEATH ! ISIS REMNANT vs Emanator of Nihility ACHERON !!! (11-1-3)

Status
Not open for further replies.
If Acheron has no layers then I don't think she can even move in Isis' presence even in non-serious state...
 
Actually negative tracking..
So essentially you can't prove how she interacts with CM1 and drawing conclusion somehow she resists CM1 cuz your conclusions????????

Bro can you stop making new analogy of Metaphysical aspects and stop NLFing from nothing?
 
So essentially you can't prove how she interacts with CM1 and drawing conclusion somehow she resists CM1 cuz your conclusions????????

Bro can you stop making new analogy of Metaphysical aspects and stop NLFing from nothing?
What? HOW DID YOU INTERPRET IT LIKE THIS. I MEANT THE MATCH AT BEST WOULD BE DEEMED INCONCLUSIVE THE SAME WAY ISIS HAS ZERO COUNTERS AGAINST IM2

Put it like this, it wouldn't make sense for Kratos to be able to resist plot hax and Bugs being unable to interact with Kratos just because Kratos is conceptual. The same way applies here, it wouldn't make sense for Isis to resist IM2 just because Acheron is incapable of interacting with Isis CM1

What I meant to say is that both parties have no wincons of their own, it's either Acheron stomps, inconclusive or Isis stomps. IT'S THIS SIMPLE
 
Put it like this, it wouldn't make sense for Kratos to be able to resist plot hax and Bugs being unable to interact with Kratos just because Kratos is conceptual. The same way applies here, it wouldn't make sense for Isis to resist IM2 just because Acheron is incapable of interacting with Isis CM1
Kratos doesn't even have AE1 what are you about even
 
"By your logic, Acheron can't do anything to Isis because a concept permeates Isis's entire being and Acheron can't affect those"
Just because a power stems from something doesn't mean that it would automatically be unaffected or supersede anything without that property. By that logic, Bugs can't do anything to Kratos because a concept permeates his entire being and Bugs can't affect those.
Which is why the logic is faulty, because it would imply that Kratos here in another scenario had Resistance to plot just because Bugs is unable to interact with concept

It's like assuming Isis resists IM2 on the basis just because Acheron is incapable of interacting with Isis CM1
 
Which is why the logic is faulty, because it would imply that Kratos here in another scenario had Resistance to plot just because Bugs is unable to interact with concept

It's like assuming Isis resists IM2 on the basis just because Acheron is incapable of interacting with Isis CM1
How is a universal concept comprised of bits of information
 
Kratos doesn't even have AE1 what are you about even
Riiight so then why is Bugs unable to harm Kratos because apparently Bugs required interacting to Kratos concept first?

It's because AE1 and conceptual invulnerability isn't really that different, and Kratos has conceptual invulnerability. Which if you ask me, Bugs should've won the matchup because of Plot Manipulation but the match was deemed inconclusive anyway because Bugs can't interact with concept and Kratos can't resist PM
 
It's because AE1 and conceptual invulnerability isn't really that different, and Kratos has conceptual invulnerability. Which if you ask me, Bugs should've won the matchup because of Plot Manipulation but the match was deemed inconclusive anyway because Bugs can't interact with concept and Kratos can't resist PM
actually keep going, i cant stop laughing by how this things even correlate
 
How is a universal concept comprised of bits of information
I never said this btw, I just said that it would be NLF for Isis to resist IM2 just based on Acheron being incapable of interacting with concept, which is the same way as why Kratos resisting PM just because Bugs is incapable of interacting with concept based stuff at all is also NLF and the match is hence deemed inconclusive
 
Isis should have info 2 manip and resist with her entire existence being a WC authority on her profile.
Boast is just too lazy.
 
Jokes aside, I don't see how Mei copes with Isis's AE on CM1. Sure she has all that info interaction going on but against Isis it's like trying to use a potato peeler on space itself.

So voting for Isis
No need, if Isis wincon is like this then it's a complete stomp for Acheron since she has no wincons at all, and if you'd agree with my reasoning on why Acheron would win: it's also the same because Isis doesn't have their own wincon against that, or its inconclusive

It's either a stomp which couldn't be added, or it's inconclusive. That's it.
 
Because Nether somehow thinks Invulnerability to something is AE1
Alright then tell me why does Bugs have to interact with Kratos conceptual invulnerability first to be able to harm him instead of just using Plot Manipulation since the invulnerability only covers concept based things?

Thats like the whole ass reason the matchup was deemed inconclusive over there LMFAO
 
Alright then tell me why does Bugs have to interact with Kratos conceptual invulnerability first to be able to harm him instead of just using Plot Manipulation since the invulnerability only covers concept based things?

Thats like the whole ass reason the matchup was deemed inconclusive over there LMFAO
stop bringing up other fights bruh
 
why the hell are we talking about kratos???
Because using @Hecky2222's logic, somehow Isis' AE1 to concept type 1 grants Isis resistances to all of Acheron's ability instead of debating that Isis has resistance to Acheron's ability through other means. It's as faulty as Bugs having to interact with Kratos conceptual invul just because Kratos in this scenario, his being is permeated by concepts the same way as Isis, in which the match is deemed inconclusive in that scenario

Dont know why are we voting on something in which the other party has zero wincons at all, inconclusive is if both wincons are valid and the matchup can only be added if A's wincon is slightly better than B and vice versa not like A's wincon > B's wincon completely (stomp)
 
stop bringing up other fights bruh
Because using @Hecky2222's logic, somehow Isis' AE1 to concept type 1 grants Isis resistances to all of Acheron's ability instead of debating that Isis has resistance to Acheron's ability through other means. It's as faulty as Bugs having to interact with Kratos conceptual invul just because Kratos in this scenario, his being is permeated by concepts the same way as Isis, in which the match is deemed inconclusive in that scenario
 
No need, if Isis wincon is like this then it's a complete stomp for Acheron since she has no wincons at all, and if you'd agree with my reasoning on why Acheron would win: it's also the same because Isis doesn't have their own wincon against that, or its inconclusive

It's either a stomp which couldn't be added, or it's inconclusive. That's it.
I believe your reasoning is that; there's no reason for her CM1 to resist info type 2?

It's pretty much like, just because you can interact with info of an apple or physical thing doesn't mean you can do the same with Type 1 concepts.

Other than that, if her Void (manipulation) isn't NEP on concept type 1, it just can't interact with concept type 1 either. We don't assume something NEP is so on all aspects by default. That's why when listing NEP aspects 2, we specify the type of said aspect if it has multiple; in Mei's case it's Aspect 2/Concepts (Type 2)
 
Literally the only thing differentiating conceptual invul and AE1 to concept is that the former had their entire being permeated by it, the latter had their entire being, well they're concepts themselves. There's arbitrarily zero difference other than you requiring feats to be able to interact with these, which is to say the main reason it was deemed inconclusive instead. Because in this scenario, both parties actually have their own wincons. But what Isis supporters argued? They deadass just said Acheron can't interact with Isis and somehow Isis had resistance to all of Acheron's abilities through different means, there's virtually ZERO WINCONS
 
I believe your reasoning is that; there's no reason for her CM1 to resist info type 2?

It's pretty much like, just because you can interact with info of an apple or physical thing doesn't mean you can do the same with Type 1 concepts.

Other than that, if her Void (manipulation) isn't NEP on concept type 1, it just can't interact with concept type 1 either. We don't assume something NEP is so on all aspects by default. That's why when listing NEP aspects 2, we specify the type of said aspect if it has multiple; in Mei's case it's Aspect 2/Concepts (Type 2)
Yeah which is why it's inconclusive, because if not then it's a stomp as Acheron virtually has zero wincons as Isis resists all of Acheron's hax through diff means, but if you followed my reasoning on why Acheron would win, Isis has zero wincons too. There's no voting because it's either a stomp or inconclusive
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top