Hello Bambu, I'd like your opinion regarding a certain modification for the Creation Feats page, more specifically, this part:
My main issue, specifically, is the fact that in some games (or similar media) where such a feat happens, we simply "accept the stars as they are because there is no reason not to" when they have no mention of them, nor by characters, nor by the narrative. If anything, they might as well not exist. The worst part, in my opinion, is that the opposite is equally plausible, but simply dismissed due to "lack of proof" when the positive affirmation is equally lacking proof.
The point I'd like to make is simply that the "background stars, planets, moons, or anything really" that exist within a pocket reality should, at the very least, be acknowledged somewhere. By a character, the narrative, heck, even the context could be inferred if needed.
Specifically, I want you to focus on the second criterion. I feel like there are a lot of visual presentations that are, especially in games or similar visual media, simply decoration flares and aren't meant to prove the size or the tier of a Pocket Reality.
My main issue, specifically, is the fact that in some games (or similar media) where such a feat happens, we simply "accept the stars as they are because there is no reason not to" when they have no mention of them, nor by characters, nor by the narrative. If anything, they might as well not exist. The worst part, in my opinion, is that the opposite is equally plausible, but simply dismissed due to "lack of proof" when the positive affirmation is equally lacking proof.
The point I'd like to make is simply that the "background stars, planets, moons, or anything really" that exist within a pocket reality should, at the very least, be acknowledged somewhere. By a character, the narrative, heck, even the context could be inferred if needed.
eadguy999/Ropalolyst_surviving_huge_laser#First_Feat
)
