This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
In that case the hypertimeline claim would be a weak argument with the proof given IMO, yet under the current tiering system 6-D in total would be fine, but I'm unaware on if the new system would allow "disqualified" cases of R>F to still be treated as higher-D, given a good chunk of the premise...
Oh, well then, just wanted to be sure I wasn't missing anything.
5-D seems fine to me, but 6-D by hypertimeline arguments may need further input as merely having different time speeds isn't sufficient as explained in the Tiering System FAQ.
I suppose I wouldn't mind to see what a mod thinks on this, looking around further it seems rather open-ended, but at the same time it'd be inappropiate to claim that a "counless" amount is in a weird spot of being above any concrete number, yet below infinity.
That's more of a site policy, again.
Hax on that regard is more of a gray area and this not really a factor for this discussion as it's its own can of worms.
Precedent of that has been affirmed by staff here, but overall the main concern is on being hyperbolic here, which appears to be as if...
All "countless" 2-B characters are baseline number of universes, and all 2-C characters without detail are defaulted to 2 universes, it's a common site standard, as much we don't consider characters with "countless" finite AP any arbitrary point of the tier they'd be on otherwise, but the...
So the argument relies on there being infinite people, thus infinite dreams, then there being infinite universes within some of those dreams that have their own infinite set of people that can make another layer of infinite dreams, with these dreams being simply equivalent to universes? My main...
By any chance would Shinza be included there? Namely as after digging around, it's a rather obscure novel mostly exclusive to Japan from a company that went bankrupt after trying to make an anime for it, so it's far from iconic or notable. When looking it up most results also lean to VSBW.
I'd want to ask on if this Time Stop is of the kind that allows doing damage in Sephiroth's relative time, or the damage only happens once the Time Stop wears off, if it's the latter then Prevasion would trigger, I'd think.
Okay, I've properly watched Wish now that it dropped into Disney+, and I can say that it somehow would fit in KH lore, namely as in KH all Disney worlds used to be a single one, which then got destroyed and reborn into "countless" separate ones after a large war to gain Kingdom Hearts.
TBH I'd...
IIRC the Septima stuff is simply a combination of genetics (aka, biological physiology) and willpower, so I don't think it's compatible with magic stuff per-say.
Would it be fine to work on basically a general template for them that users can just go differently from if desired? That way it'd be possible to standarize this stuff while also avoiding the previous concerns of having to reformat basically every single current verse-specific P&A
The "High 3-A" part would fall under the "infinities involved" umbrella that was previously mentioned, I'm not saying that we should entirely dismiss the idea of it being case by case, but at the same time there should be some minimal outlines for users to be capable of judging properly, we...
Thing is that as things currently stand no argument can ever be made for it as we just default to trying to preserve the status quo independently of how much sense a particular case makes, at best we'd need some more details on how such kind of cases can go "against the norm" without basically...
Not many users really touch LS semantics in the first place, especially when it comes to involve infinite tiers and so on, in fact I had some plans to do stuff among these lines depending on how this thread went.
Thing is that two separate verses can have conflicting takes on how to approach...
Bump.
Well, if no one disagrees with Armorchompy's take at this point on LS to damage characters requiring mainly comparable AP or above, and at least LS to "realistically" do it on a 10-B human in most scenarios, then I think it may be worth considering to be mentioned as a note in the LS page...
By close it'd be around two meters, spherically.
But yeah, this really seems like a mismatch, Ainz has no legitimate wincon while GV can just one shot.
Oh no, by SBA that still remains as a factor, in fact that's part of the reason Barney the Dinosaur is banned from versus threads, but regardless, by SBA the characters see the opponent as a legitimate threat to everything they know or care about, so there's minimal incentive to hold back here...
I've also seen other forums have the mods manually recognize what some users have done, and under some consistent criteria, grant them images to display on their profile that can only be done so (aka, earned) in this manner, this also doubles as something that can be added to a curriculum vitae.