• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

GER

11
3
Who is more powerful, a being who can destroy and/or re-create an infinite 4d universe (like an entire timeline in Sailor Moon) or a being who can destroy and/or re-create an infinite 4d multiverse (the 4d universes it contains, however, are finite; like the one in SDBH iirc)?
 
With current standard, destroy/create/affect 4d infinite universe is Low 2-C while destroy/create/affect 4d infinite multiverse is 2-A, so obviously the later is superior
 
With current standard, destroy/create/affect 4d infinite universe is Low 2-C while destroy/create/affect 4d infinite multiverse is 2-A, so obviously the later is superior
Oh, I see. I thought Infinite Low 2-C will be equal to 2-A (with finite 4D universes) if you were to think it through on another perspective, since infinity will always be >>>>>>>>>>>>> any finite number possible. And the infinite amount of 4d universes will stalemate the infinite 4d universe, I guess.
 
Oh, I see. I thought Infinite Low 2-C will be equal to 2-A (with finite 4D universes) if you were to think it through on another perspective, since infinity will always be >>>>>>>>>>>>> any finite number possible. And the infinite amount of 4d universes will stalemate the infinite 4d universe, I guess.
Actually no, because there is multiple thing involves since space-time is 4D due to time axis of space-time which contain uncountable infinite amount of 3d object snapshot on it length which always > infinite amount of 3d objects, infinite universe mean there is countable infinite amount of 3d objects, while space-time of a finite-sized universe, due to having involve time axis, will have uncountable infinite amount of snapshot of those 3d objects, and 2-A mean infinite amount of those time axis which obviously > Low 2-C which mean only 1 time axis involved

But anyway there probably a CRT to address space-time of infinite-sized universe in the future
 
Actually no, because there is multiple thing involves since space-time is 4D due to time axis of space-time which contain uncountable infinite amount of 3d object snapshot on it length which always > infinite amount of 3d objects, infinite universe mean there is countable infinite amount of 3d objects, while space-time of a finite-sized universe, due to having involve time axis, will have uncountable infinite amount of snapshot of those 3d objects, and 2-A mean infinite amount of those time axis which obviously > Low 2-C which mean only 1 time axis involved

But anyway there probably a CRT to address space-time of infinite-sized universe in the future
Now I understand. Thanks for the info btw. I totally forgot that 4d isn't size but time, so even though there is an infinite 4d universe. It doesn't mean it's near the size of an infinite 4d multiverse.
 
Back
Top